Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I’m voting for Donald Trump, so I went to see him speak. Protesters broke my nose.
WaPo ^ | 06-10-2016 | Juan Hernandez

Posted on 06/10/2016 12:29:03 PM PDT by NRx

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Moonman62
Official San Jose gave the thugs "room to destroy" just what the moronic Baltimore Mayor said she did........

Garcia and Liccardo and other govt official party to this outrage can be charged under the Hobbs Act.

Although the Hobbs Act was enacted as a statute to combat racketeering in labor-management disputes, the statute is frequently used in connection with cases involving public corruption.....

WIKI---The Hobbs Act, named after Congressman Sam Hobbs (D-AL) and codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1951, is a U.S. federal law enacted in 1946 that provides:

(a) Whoever in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce, by robbery or extortion or attempts or conspires so to do, or commits or threatens physical violence to any person or property in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation of this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

Section 1951 also proscribes conspiracy to commit robbery or extortion without reference to the conspiracy statute at 18 U.S.C. § 371.

The Hobbs Act criminalizes both robbery and extortion, where: "robbery" means the unlawful taking or obtaining of personal property from the person or in the presence of another, against his will;

"extortion" means the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.

41 posted on 06/11/2016 4:10:07 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
The Mayor the Police Chief (perhaps the Fire Dept) are easy targets for lawsuits.

La Raza Mayor Liccardo has to be stupidity personified. He has already admitted guilt.... he opined about previous Trump rallies noting "the pattern" of thuggery (using RICO language). He knew there would be trouble.....he abdicated his reponsibility....did nothing to protect San Jose taxpayers from thugs.

===================================================

REALITY CHECK Appears there is a conspiracy by Mayor Liccardo and Police Chief Garcia (1) to let thugs burn the American flag, (2) to maul and attack Trump supporters, and, (3) advance intl plots to overthrow the US govt.

L/E looking the other way as Trump supporters were attacked cannot be tolerated. This MUST be investigated and punishment meted out at the highest level possible.

Time to open the books of tax-subsidized San Jose law enforcement agencies. What are they requesting tax dollars for? And what are they doing with tax dollars?

Garcia and Liccardo are both La Raza activists---did La Raza ever receive tax dollars from S/J budgets? For what reason? How as it used?

Taxpayers demand investigations by the following agencies commence at once:

<><> FBI -- Wire Fraud Division

<><> IRS-Fraud Unit

<><> Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General,

<><> Department of Commerce’s Office of Inspector General.

<><> DOJ's Criminal Division-- Public Integrity Section

<><> DOJ Criminal Division--Organized Crime and Gang Section.

===============================================

It is also possible that San Jose L/E official committed other federal offenses including but not limited to:

<><> Title 18 U.S.C. §1341, Mail Fraud, 18 U.S.C.§1001, Presenting a False Document to an Agent of the US Government (involves several felonies and could include forgery); NOTE falsifying official documents is the preferred criminal method to cover-up larger crimes)

<><> 18 U.S.C.§1027 False statements and concealment of facts in relation to documents required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and other possible offenses including civiland/or criminal RICO violations.

<><> 18 U.S.C. §§1961-68 (RICO Act)18 U.S.C. §1001 (making false Statements to Agents of the US Government),

<><> 18 U.S.C. §241(Conspiracies, collusion, aiding and abetting violations of the Civil Rights of San Jose taxpayers).

Possibly full investigations centering on RICO conspiracies under 18 U.S.C. §1962(c) could be warranted because: (1) the errant L/E personnel are (1) employed by or associated with an enterprise (2) that engaged in or affected interstate commerce and that (3) the persons operated or managed the enterprise (4) through a "pattern" (5) of racketeering activity, and, (6) the taxpayers were injured by reason of the "pattern" of racketeering activity.

Alleged Offenses could include: Violation of Title 18 U.S.C. §241 – Conspiracy Against Constitutional Rights – which prohibits in relevant part, “two or more persons (from conspiring) to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same . . .” See, 18 U.S.C. §241.

<><>42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.

For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. (R.S. 1979; Pub. L. 96–170, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 104–317, title III, 309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.)

42 posted on 06/11/2016 4:16:58 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liz

If there is no law....... then it logically follows that there is no law

The president is in danger as are his minions


43 posted on 06/11/2016 4:19:49 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bert

Oh yeah.....Boobamba cant figure out what goes around comes around.


44 posted on 06/11/2016 4:26:17 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: slipper

“Reading the comments under the article shows the mentality of the left. Most of the comments state that he deserved to be beat up because he went to a Trump rally.
Sick society we live in now.”

Clearly displays the bias of the Washington Compost that they allow those comments to remain...


45 posted on 06/11/2016 5:57:56 AM PDT by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson