Posted on 06/09/2016 11:39:58 AM PDT by Kaslin
Also a NY Detective told me that a fax came in to the police station alerting them to a stolen boat were the missile may have been launched off of.
Another Detective who didn’t believe it was shot down later on met an FBI diver that told him they found explosive chemical from a missile and the missile launching device. These bastards knew it was a terrorist attack.
BJ also knew of the plan to attack the world trade center in 96. Read Dereliction of Duty, unless you’re on blood pressure pills.
Bfl
Any terrorist organization who base their plans on a plane leaving JFK on time is either filled with idiots of with people who have never flown out of New York.
Or, had big deposits in their bank accounts.
But this doesn’t solve the problem of a missile that can reach the airliner. No, a small boat can’t hold a Standard Missile launcher. It would tear a boat apart. That’s pure James Bond stuff.
So a boat does not equal a missile.
1) yes.
2) depends on the exercise.
3) yes. So now you have to account for two missiles. A drone and the missile shot to take it out. Radar shows none. Navy claims no missiles were fired. No one saw TWO trails. So, what? The Navy fired a drone that it was going to shoot down, thought better of it, but in the mean time the drone just happened to fly through an airliner? All the while the Navy is doing live fire releases in civilian air space? Come on.
For Pete’s sake use some sense. This isn’t a shoulder-fired RPG. These are massive installations that require a stable battery with incredible knowledge and electronics, costing (the whole thing) tens of millions of dollars . . .
to take out a civilian airliner that no one ever claimed credit for, for which there is no reason to shoot down that particular airliner? Please. Let’s get some rationality here.
I don’t know a lot of the possibilities, but we can pretty well state that no terrorist ever got a standard missile battery, then tried to conceal it by making it look like a “pass through” missile, then HOPED the Navy might have an exercise going on that it MIGHT be able to blame it on . . . but not take credit.
So if the radar caught a boat, it surely would have caught a missile, right?
The pilots trailing that radioed that the plane was getting shot at were not loaded or stoned.
The other aircraft whose pilots saw the object rise up to meet the target were not loaded.
My friend and I were intently watching the cnn feed as they hauled out parts from the ocean with the crane.. They lifted up one section that was about 6-8 feet in a rectangular shape, and my friend sprang out of his seat, ran to the screen and exclaimed " Look there, the missle punched there!" It was a hole about 6-10 inches, in the lower center of the suspended piece with the water draining from it. That piece never was placed back on the mock up. There is a section of fuselage missing under the wing, I believe on the right, which is the likely section that was "lost".
Regards you not seeing anything on the radar, unless you were there monitoring the original screen as it was happening, scrubbing it would prevent you from ever seeing it.
Weather this was an accidental shoot down or a terrorist shoot down, it was a shoot down, and the entire law enforcement and investigation changed gears and direction after the weekend.
It would have ended Clinton's bid for a second term, and that was not going to happen while he could command a coverup and material tampering.
The evil that permeates from the clintons the obamas the criminals that hide the truth continue to rule the airwaves and get elected to a country that is slowly being murdered by these people. When do we get serious
Radar data from where?
I recall and this maybe an early internet rumor but Clinton gave TWA a 747 to replace the one that got blowed up
THOSE PHOTOGRAPHERS WERE TAKING PICTURES OF PEOPLE WAITING FOE THE ARRIVAL OF FRIENDS AND LOVED ONES WHO WERE DEAD VICTIMS OF TWA 800!
How crass and unfeeling the media is worldwide.
-PJ
heartwood: I dont think everyone on a ship with dozens to hundreds of crew would keep quiet, for twenty years.
Pensions. Audits. Families.
Its not hard for the gov to do.
The only real necessity is the desire to do it for that long. The Clintons were in office then. Hillary is running now. Connect the dots.
Why couldn't a Stinger be launched from a MANPADS from this boat that was close enough?
-PJ
I wached it too, no doubt in my mind it was a missile.
watched
We’re going to need a bigger boat, right?
I never believed the guberments explanation. Too many witnesses saying the same thing as this guy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.