FBI: Records from Clinton's email server being held as 'evidence'

www.washingtonexaminer.com ^ | 6/8/16 11:28 AM | By Sarah Westwood

[Walkingfeather]

THE IMPORTANT POINT OF ALL OF THIS ARTICLE IS THIS LINE. ....

e Department officials, the law enforcement agency did reveal its investigation is focused on a “security referral made for counterintelligence purposes” by the inspector general of the intelligence community.

WHAT INSPECTOR GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE COMMINITY?
WAS THERE AN INVESTIGATION ?
IS THERE A REPORT FROM THIS OFFICE?
FOIA THIS PLEASE!!!!

[Mariner]

For cases under the Espionage Act, search warrants are optional.

[Thank You Rush]

“”She might be the first female president and will be the first female president indicted and sent to prison, hopefully SuperMax.””

I thought last night when the statement was made about her making history - if she makes it to the WH, we can hope and pray, more history is made by impeaching another CLINTON president. I wouldn’t even care if she wasn’t convicted - just go through the process and wake this country up then maybe we can get down to the real work of repairing the damage....and as the democrats are fond of saying:
MAKING SURE IT NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN!

[Thank You Rush]

“”Why don’t they audit her taxes? They got Capone that way.
I’d be willing to bet there’s cooked books somewhere.””

Even that doesn’t work with the Clintons. They own up to errors in their filings and get busy amending the returns...They apparently file erroneous returns and if they don’t get flagged, so much the better. If they do, we’re sorry and we’ll take care of that right away!

[SkyDancer]

Hopefully she’ll be spending all her time with the FBI.

[publius911]

The FBI argued that disclosing even the number of records it has pulled off Clinton's server, thumb drive or other unnamed devices "could reasonably lead to the public identification and compromising of potential witnesses, as well as defensive actions to conceal activities, elude detection, and/or suppress or fabricate evidence."

From our unprecedented, historic first ever unindicted felon Ugly Fat Cow errrr... first ever alleged woman candidate ever nominated by a previously major national political party for eligibility as president of the United States?

That unprecedented and historic event?

[publius911]

“”Given the Department’s current [Freedom of Information Act] (FOIA) workload and the complexity of these documents, it can process about 500 pages a month, meaning it would take approximately 16-and-2/3 years to complete the review of the Mills documents, 33-and-1/3 years to finish the review of the Sullivan documents, and 25 years to wrap up the review of the Kennedy documents — or 75 years in total,” the State Department said in the filing.””

Oh I get it now.
They are all sequential work done by a single individual, and she doesn't graduate College until the spring of 2017.

CHECK!

[TigersEye]

But the breaking news is that it will take 75 years to "go through them all".

Hillary did it in a couple of weeks. What's this 75 years nonsense?

Very good point!