Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How long can Britain's combat aircraft industry fly high for?
The Telegraph, U.K. ^ | 28 May, 2016 | Alan Tovey

Posted on 05/28/2016 8:44:08 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

The silhouette of one of the British Army’s Apache attack helicopters in the skies over Afghanistan is a reassuring sight for coalition forces on the battlefield. Its ungainly shape projects a menacing power that foes are unlikely to stand up to – if they haven’t already fled at the sound of its approaching rotors.

But this symbol of British military power won’t be quite so British in the future. It’s almost certain that a forthcoming order for 50 updated Apaches will go to Boeing, the latest in a spate of major defence deals to go to the US. Three weeks ago, Defence Secretary Michael Fallon announced he would soon sign the contract for the first of P-8 Poseidon, part of a nine-aircraft deal worth £2bn.

Even the current Apache isn’t as British as the layman might think – it’s a Boeing design that Britain modified. The first eight were built in the US, with the remainder assembled from Boeing-supplied kits by Westland Helicopters in Yeovil, where they were given better engines from Rolls-Royce, more advanced avionics and other upgrades.

The work, which made the UK helicopters far more capable than their American contemporaries, maintained British engineering expertise, but the modifications more than doubled the cost, adding £24m to each of the £20m basic helicopters.

Since the prospect of modernising the fleet of Apaches was first mooted, Westland – which is now owned by Leonardo, the recently renamed Finmeccanica – argued for a similar arrangement, in a deal that would guarantee skills and jobs in the UK. However, Boeing countered that adding new Apaches for the UK on to a much larger order from the US military would mean the price would be slashed.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aerospace; royalairforce; uk

The Typhoon jet is a pan-European collaboration

1 posted on 05/28/2016 8:44:08 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; Salamander; TheOldLady
"How long can Britain's combat aircraft industry fly high for?"

How for can long prepositional participles bedangled be?

Someone call please the Grammbulance! Arr!

2 posted on 05/28/2016 8:53:32 AM PDT by shibumi (Vampire Outlaw of the Milky Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

Really? Is that now what passes for the King’s English?


3 posted on 05/28/2016 9:08:15 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They are thinking about the problem all wrong. The British have been amazingly innovative. Many of the specialties of American companies originated from a gift of technology such as jet engines and radar that was given to the US in exchange for producing weapons in mass that Britain needed for World War II. A head start, economies of scale and the financial situation in Britain has made American made products unassailable.

Currently, the world’s largest producer of drone aircraft is Israel. But drones are a market in its infancy. The British could take their existing expertise and create an entirely new market that might obsolete American technology. The next big thing is probably swarm machinery. Each machine, or drone, would have limited capabilities, like ants. But in dozens or hundreds they could deny entire countries to manned aircraft, glide bombs and flying smart weapons.

The problem is one of investment. And, governments are the worst investors imaginable. The US government funded a program to develop the first airplane. Nine days and thousands of dollars after the government announced manned flight was impossible, the Wright brothers flew their fist plane.


4 posted on 05/28/2016 9:25:18 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

Cor, blimey!


5 posted on 05/28/2016 9:31:44 AM PDT by Salamander (Disco bloodbath boogie fever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

Immigrant. Whatcha ‘spect to do, even.


6 posted on 05/28/2016 10:41:01 AM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Looks like the Telegraph is hiring semi-literates to write headlines these days. Sloppy editing on the cutlines, as well: “The Nimrod - which was scrapped - was the one of the last indigenous British combat aircraft projectsan”


7 posted on 05/28/2016 11:10:43 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I had to look at the source to actually see the lame-brain grammar used in the title. Wow! It isn’t getting any better, folks.


8 posted on 05/28/2016 2:19:35 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

British engineering expertise...so the electronic systems short out when it rains?


9 posted on 05/28/2016 3:57:51 PM PDT by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson