Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Robots and Unintended Consequences
Artful Dilettante ^ | May 27, 2016 | Artful Dilettante

Posted on 05/27/2016 7:34:53 PM PDT by huckfillary

A predictable consequence of the move to increase the minimum wage to $15 an hour will be the hastened transition from human to a more robotic work-force. A photo that went viral this week showed a robot "manning" the take-out window at McDonald's. You can expect to see more of this. Employers will, of course, be pilloried by the usual cast of economically-challenged Marxists in the political and chattering classes as heartless, sexist, homophobic racists, etc., who put profits before people. But the non-economically challenged among us realize that the increased use of robots is a completely rational response of the market to government-imposed wage and benefit mandates that push the cost of labor above that which the consumer is willing to pay.

For the heck of it, I started brainstorming and prepared a list of reasons why robots, for economic and non-economic reasons, are preferable to humans as employees.

1 - they don't need health-care insurance, paid time-off, or workmen's comp;

2 - they don't call in sick; they're never late;

3 - they follow orders with no back-talk or sassing. They don't complain or "cop an attitude;"

4 - they don't get bored with repetitive tasks;

5 - they don't gossip or get involved in interoffice politics;

6 - they don't require maternity leave;

7 - they are not subject to onerous OSHA health and safety regulations;

8 - they don't file grievances or sue for civil rights violations

9 - they don't require a lengthy and expensive training process;

10 - they don't take smoke breaks, bathroom breaks, or lunch breaks

11- they don't need transgender bathrooms;

12 - they don't lobby for increases in the minimum wage;

13 - they don't stage sit-ins over working conditions;

14 - they don't celebrate Christmas, Hanukah, Kwanzaa, or Festivus requiring time off from work;

15 - they're not afraid to get their "hands dirty;"

16 - their cars never break down on the way to work;

17 - they don't require drug testing;

18 - their kids don't get sick or need day-care;

19 - they never argue with the customers;

20 - they never give the wrong change; they never steal from the company;

21 - citizenship is not an issue nor do they need security clearances;

22 - there are no language barriers; they don't have to attend ESL classes;

23 - they don't need permission to wear a burka;

24 - they can be completely illiterate and still perform their jobs flawlessly. Public education is not an issue and doesn't affect their job performance;

25 - they're never at risk for engaging in sexually inappropriate behavior.

This list is by no means exhaustive. In fact, I could go on and on. They don't need to fill out a W-2, etc., etc.... You are encouraged to submit additions to the list. My next piece on robots will be a list of positions which I believe could reasonably be filled by robots. Again, a completely rational response of the market to the increased cost of human labor largely as the result of government actions. Stay tuned and have a safe and happy Memorial Day weekend. And to those clamoring for the $15 minimum wage--be careful what you wish for.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: diy; makerspaces; minimumwage; opensource; permaculture; robots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 05/27/2016 7:34:53 PM PDT by huckfillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: huckfillary

Correction on 3. The female robots will talk back when in snark mode. Which you cant turn off.


2 posted on 05/27/2016 7:43:22 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary

They don’t adulterate your food deliberately.


3 posted on 05/27/2016 7:45:38 PM PDT by Silentgypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary

Other things about robots.

1. They don’t earn a paycheck and spend it elsewhere in the economy.

2. They don’t marry and have children and purchase or rent homes, and buy all the usual needs of a family or individual consumer.

The list could be very long, but I wouldn’t get too excited about the wonders of a world where economies have no need for the labor of a large part of the population.

Will lead to a massive central, redistributionist government.


4 posted on 05/27/2016 7:46:39 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bender2

Ping.


5 posted on 05/27/2016 7:47:32 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary

They don’t need.... managers.


6 posted on 05/27/2016 7:49:20 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Not to mention far, far too many yutes with nothing to do but cause mayhem.


7 posted on 05/27/2016 7:54:24 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

They’ll just get free money from Bernie’s stash and chillax all day


8 posted on 05/27/2016 8:10:47 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary
Automated production will be much more decentralized and distributed in the near future. And there will be no regulatory local government administrators, employees or NIMBYs.

Transforming Our Communities Ourselves With Technology

It's what former fast food employees and many other truly technically inclined people will do.


9 posted on 05/27/2016 8:12:20 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Yep, I think people who believe that job elimination is something to be celebrated are in for the proverbial rude awakening. Well, at least those who live long enough to see a world where a large part of populations are not needed in the economies of nations where they live.

Much better if most working age folks have something productive to do to occupy their time.


10 posted on 05/27/2016 8:14:24 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Will88
"Other things about robots.

1. They don’t earn a paycheck and spend it elsewhere in the economy.

2. They don’t marry and have children and purchase or rent homes, and buy all the usual needs of a family or individual consumer.

The list could be very long, but I wouldn’t get too excited about the wonders of a world where economies have no need for the labor of a large part of the population.
"

I'm excited about it, because it will help to bring the default process and the regulatory regime to its conclusion. See comment #9...

...and

http://opensourceecology.org/

Imagine all design being open source...or have a look at it. Imagine all production being much more distributed.


11 posted on 05/27/2016 8:18:19 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: familyop
It's what former fast food employees and many other truly technically inclined people will do.

It's what a small portion of the population might do. People are kidding themselves when they pretend that large numbers of people with marginal education and few job skills are going to find productive work in a highly automated world where even the labor intensive work still available is exported to the cheapest labor that can be found around the world.

12 posted on 05/27/2016 8:20:42 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: familyop

You’re living in a fantasy world if you think what you describe is going to result in productive work for an large portion of a nation’s population. There is always a limited number of self-starters and truly innovative people in a given population.


13 posted on 05/27/2016 8:26:15 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary
Nancy Palousy will be thrilled when 3/4 of working-age people are unemployed and replaced by robots. She should retread her March 2012 remarks about government "healthcare":

“As you hear from these stories, this is a liberation,” Pelosi said at a Capitol Hill news conference. “This is what our founders had in mind--ever expanding opportunity for people. You want to be a photographer or a writer or a musician, whatever -- an artist, you want to be self-employed, if you want to start a business, you want to change jobs, you no longer are prohibited from doing that because you can’t have access to health care, especially because you do not want to put your family at risk."

14 posted on 05/27/2016 8:36:08 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary

Robots do not sue and/or shut down your business because you hired or promoted a deserving and competent robot of a different paint color or plumbing setup.


15 posted on 05/27/2016 8:36:43 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88
"People are kidding themselves when they pretend that large numbers of people with marginal education and few job skills are going to find productive work in a highly automated world where even the labor intensive work still available is exported to the cheapest labor that can be found around the world."

Yes, the degreed interns are more visible to most folks who discuss politics in depth. One might even say that they're related. ;-)

Necessity is the mother of invention...and of tenacity.


16 posted on 05/27/2016 8:57:42 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary

17 posted on 05/27/2016 9:08:01 PM PDT by avenir (I'm pessimistic about man, but I'm optimistic about GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Open source equipment will be more cost effective and efficient than patented equipment. I do agree with your previous comments. Automation equipment purchased by government-backed entities for large production operations will help to end the regime of recirculating debt. Their former employees won’t be able to buy their products. Neither will their unemployed regulators in the very near future (see debt, default process). Small, open source operations will continue to grow and replicate.


18 posted on 05/27/2016 9:17:26 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary

19 posted on 05/27/2016 9:21:14 PM PDT by null and void (Progressives replaced doublethink, doublespeak with nothink, nospeak. Orwell wasn't up to the task)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary

Ja tvoi sluga
Ja tvoi Rabotnik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g624J80unX8

(Kraftwerk)


20 posted on 05/27/2016 9:21:18 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson