This is on FR somewhere - but I can't find it. We all know this is a BS hit piece designed only to de-legitimize our belief and stance... but I wanted to open this up to FR discussion.
What does everyone here think ?
What seem interesting was it mentions the followers of these groups on the Internet.
A new enemy.
I think you are more likely to see acts of terrorism by roving bands of SJWs then any right wing groups.
Soper has been in the middle of all of it. He says he has tried to be a more moderate voice in a movement best known for its hotheads. He spent a month living in his RV at Burns, trying to talk the occupiers into standing down.
Soper considers Finicum’s death “murder.”
That kind of talk is “a big deal,” said Stephanie Douglas, who retired in 2013 as the FBI’s top official overseeing foreign and domestic counterterrorism programs. “Free speech doesn’t make you a terrorist just because you disagree with the government. But if you start espousing violence and radicalizing your own people toward a violent act, the federal government is going to take notice.”
Funny, I don't recall anyone applying that standard to discussions about Trayvon Martin, or Michael Brown.
For Ms. Douglas saying you consider someone's death who was killed in a shootout a "murder" is unacceptable, but apparently it isn't unacceptable if the person killed was a member of a group that usually votes Democratic - even if it leads to rioting and actual violence.
How many people have been killed by the Tea Party in the last 20 years?
How many people have been killed by black street gangs?
The folks at the Washington Post need to take a deep breath and get real..
The Idaho boys rolled over and peed themselves in Oregon. Not very effective.
They are preparing for open oppression of conservatives. Think Germany 1932.
“Backlash”?
What a massively deceptive from the Leftist propagandists at Politico.
Now that's funny.