Posted on 05/21/2016 8:39:48 AM PDT by Kaslin
It is not considered polite to mention it, but Obama observers have ignored a great deal of evidence that the president of the United States was abused at approximately age ten and afterwards, in a way that would be criminal under American and European law. This whole topic should be out of bounds for political debate, but now the grown up Barack Obama has issued an edict to American school systems, which are responsible for the welfare of millions of children in this country. It is legally unprecedented that the president would direct whether schoolchildren should able to enter bathrooms reserved for a different gender. It is Obama himself who has now pushed what Freud called psychosexual development onto the political stage, where it does not belong.
Medically and scientifically, the credibility of children's beliefs about their own sexuality has no foundation in evidence. Sexual development has been studied in psychiatry and psychology since the 19th century, usually by way of case histories. But our truly reliable evidence is near zero. Any nationwide policy affecting the psychosexual development of children is therefore absurd and irresponsible on its face. Nobody knows for sure, because there is no scientific standard for sexual identity. Some studies of so-called "sex change" surgery show high failure rates. Until recently, no medical doctor would have authorized any unproven treatment for an underage individual. The Obama edict therefore has no medical or scientific basis, to say the least.
The only explanation that makes sense comes from the young Barry Soetoro's own life story.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Uh, two Clinton friends were going to out Zero at the D convention but the friends died suddently shortly before the convention. The man whose name escapes me was shot in his office and gosh gee no murderer was ever found. The woman was IIRC a newscaster was quite young but gosh gee died of a heart attack while alone in her apartment or house.
The Clintons got the message.
That is not his mother; that is his on and off nanny, Stanley Ann Dunham.
Are you kidding ? The Arkancide Criminal Clinton Clan ? That wouldn’t intimidate or stop them. Zero is a pissant punk by comparison.
Your opinion. Zero is backed by big $$$ and support from communists and mohammedans. Big support.
“...really sorry for him...”??? I’d like to see him convicted of treason and get the appropriate punishment. I feel “sorry” for all of those negatively effected by this subhuman malignancy.
I do agree. Just feel sorry that he apparently endured so much pain.
That doesn’t mean want him anywhere near a position where he could harm Americans.
And the Clintons aren’t ? Bubba sold nuclear secrets to the Red Chinese for campaign contributions in 1996.
Let’s face it, they’re all criminals and traitors to our country (and so is the Republican Establishment, who sold out to many of those same people).
“...but I also know that if the Clintons had proof of Zero being a complete fraud as you’ve outlined, they would NOT have stood idly by. Indeed, in “unmasking” Zero they would’ve portrayed themselves as heroes, having “saved” America from a Constitutional Crisis.”
Um...I will not stop you from insisting that the Clintons would have been heroes. I hate to think of what nasty things George Soros would have his European assassins do to them.
No, no, I’m saying THEY would’ve claimed to be heroes. Of course, any world in which the Clintons are heroes in comparison to Zero is one that is utterly mad.
As for Ernst Soros Blofeld, even he would not have been so insane as to make a martyr out of the Butcheress of Benghazi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.