Posted on 05/20/2016 9:23:22 AM PDT by PROCON
There’s a rule that will be rescinded.
Well, as our nation’s highest elected official, I think she can pass any laws she wants. So let it be written. So let it be done.
Now there is some brown sugar even Mick Jagger would pass up on..........
There is no such thing as Nanny State.
Nannies do not imprison you and fine you into financial ruin.
It is a Police State.
Who sponsored this legislation?
What were the vote tallies in the House and Senate?
Is there a difference between inherent sugar and added sugar in a product?
Isn’t sugar - sugar?
(This is going to cost multi-millions for food companies to run testing and change their labels)
Bathroom expression of mental illness and mandates to the food police, nice legacies. Keep it up Chewbacca and Pajama Boy.
What about mandatory disclosure of aspartame? How about letting us know whether our food is genetically modified or not? It would be nice to know I’m eating meat from cows that are grass-fed.
I wonder why after all this time Michelle has no interest in that. But then again I really don’t.
Does this racist grifter (aka: Worst Lady) have a nutrition degree? What a complete loser.
Trump will dump this new labeling rule and about a million other liberal agenda-driven regulations the Obama administration has invented to prevent the American people from living free from the reins of an oppressive big government.
Can this executive order be reversed by a new president?
If it’s not a law why do the food companies have to obey it?
Color me confused.
.
Trump better undue it
Notice the word "Rule", not "Law".
To people who eat "whole foods", "clean foods" or "pure foods", no. Added anything messes up the natural balance in pure foods.
If something isn't sweet enough in its natural state, it's better to add granulated cane sugar (or a non-chemical, non-processed alternative) on your own.
This seems to answer my question.
“The final rule, published today by the Food and Drug Administration, has been in the works for more than a decade, but the East Wing has been instrumental in shaping the policy and moving the process forward. The regulation stems from a law Congress passed in 1990 giving FDA the authority to mandate nutrition labels on food packages.”
.
Amazing how the will of an unelected wife of the American Emperor now becomes law by bureaucratic fiat.
Sorry folks, but the American experiment in limited government and ordered liberty springing up from civil society is OVER - and you lost.
Who gave her the power to do this?
We should look at the bright side of this inane crapola — at least we will know exactly which foods will be the tastiest!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.