Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberalism's Descent into Madness
American Thinker ^ | May 18, 2016 | Marvin J. Folkertsma

Posted on 05/18/2016 11:11:11 AM PDT by Kaslin

One of the most fruitful observations about politics is that it flows downhill from culture, which launches a variety of speculations about how examining specific cultural products enables us better to understand current political developments. During a year dominated by flamboyant poseurs bombarding our fair land with catchphrases and sanity-challenged promises, it seems that the concept of “madness” has few competitors to guide us through this most unusual political jungle. After all, just what is one supposed to make of an unindicted felon, an infantile socialist, and a “high energy” master of non sequitur phrases and provocative policies, all competing for the highest office in the land? Isn’t this just a bit mad?

Actually, it isn’t, at least not compared to other political events that reek of madness informed by totalitarian proclivities. Without doing a Clintonesque probing into the connotation of simple expressions, we still are compelled to ask about the meaning of the word “madness.” Here’s where culture comes into play, in this case with an essay by Charlotte Perkins Gilman titled “The Yellow Wallpaper”, which was based on an incident in her life and was published in 1892.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: hillary2106; theleft

1 posted on 05/18/2016 11:11:11 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It is not madness. It is all designed for the total control of culture, economy, thought and speech.


2 posted on 05/18/2016 11:14:09 AM PDT by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali soli o feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s spiritual. All error is traceable to a wrong view of God.

This can go in two distinctly different directions.


3 posted on 05/18/2016 11:21:15 AM PDT by lurk (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No, liberalism is insane. That covers madness. It is always in that state.


4 posted on 05/18/2016 11:34:14 AM PDT by mulligan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That must be the least enjoyable piece I’ve ever read at americanthinker.com.


5 posted on 05/18/2016 11:50:34 AM PDT by Buttons12 ( It Can't Happen Here -- Sinclair Lewis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

It is meant to appear as madness. We’re being gaslighted.


6 posted on 05/18/2016 11:54:06 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Which is now backfiring on those same folks who push liberalism.


7 posted on 05/18/2016 12:04:36 PM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The start of the finish of liberalism as we know of it.


8 posted on 05/18/2016 12:05:47 PM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
People want what they want when they want it.

What they want may not correspond to some big picture of what would be right or best, but it's hardly madness.

Or if it is, madness is almost universal.

9 posted on 05/18/2016 12:09:02 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

We shall see in November.


10 posted on 05/18/2016 12:10:21 PM PDT by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali soli o feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

11 posted on 05/18/2016 12:13:56 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I'll tell you what's wrong with society -- no one drinks from the skulls of their enemies anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lurk

It’s like Phil Robertson says—when you let man (obama, leftists loons) decide what’s right and wrong instead of God, things go to hell pretty fast.


12 posted on 05/18/2016 12:47:00 PM PDT by dandiegirl (BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

OUTSTANDING comments BUMP!


13 posted on 05/18/2016 12:47:08 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“...madness”? No...it is just LIB moonbats being LIB moonbats. To think otherwise is to probably perform a “hate” crime.


14 posted on 05/18/2016 1:04:38 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A very nice piece, and thanks for posting. I think I like this author's style very much.

It is, as others, notably the Dalrymple reference above, have pointed out: it is not so much the insanity itself that is the issue, it is the ability of its progenitors themselves to force their target audience to accept it as the new norm, that is the issue. This is an act of pure political aggression and those progenitors know it.

The "bathroom" dilemma, for example. It is a fight that the Left picked deliberately, not so much as to allow the mentally challenged access to the crapper of their choice as to allow the activists the ability to force the issue. It was an opportunity to call those goaded into reaction "bigots". It was an opportunity to stifle and intimidate dissent, and so far, although it has had very mixed success, (the less so for having been announced as complete victory in the complicit media), it has, at least, been able to commandeer the front page. That in itself is a degree of victory.

But it is merely a distraction, a victory in battle that is likely to cost them the war, for war it is, and it succeeds best if the victims don't recognize it. And we've had our noses rubbed in it. The reaction - well, the reaction in the form of one Donald Trump is one that horrifies them. They're not pretending, they never thought it would come to this.

Other examples abound. The ability of criminal agitation in the person of Black Lives Matter comes to mind. This is the black KKK come to full fruition, with a federally-guaranteed access directly to the soft underbelly of academia, ground long prepared by the Left and now pretty much ripe for harvest. Again, state-sanctioned criminal activity, violence, intimidation, with little recourse to the compromised enforcement of law. That, too, is pure political aggression, and like most bullies its prosecutors are astonished and infuriated at resistance.

Hence the insanity. Again, it is not so much the demand that the target believe three impossible things before breakfast, but the ability to force him to do so or at least to forcibly prevent him from expressing any reservation under penalty of being branded a bigot, social ostracism, and legal penalties such as the loss of job, business, personal fortune or reputation. It is a decades-long Cold War that has run its course and absent a complete and convincing electoral repudiation, leaves only the recourse of violent resistance. And the difficulty with the latter is that the agitators historically have no idea when the threshold has been crossed until the tumbrels start to roll.

15 posted on 05/18/2016 1:20:45 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

It’s like Phil Robertson says—when you let man (obama, leftists loons) decide what’s right and wrong instead of God, things go to hell pretty fast.

Foundations of social behavior built upon relative standards is a house built on quicksand. Foundations of social behavior built upon absolutes, such as God, is a house built on bedrock.

16 posted on 05/18/2016 1:38:12 PM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

It is not madness. It is all designed for the total control of culture, economy, thought and speech.


You are entirely correct. I wish more people saw that.
(It is only madness in the same spiritual way that all evil is mad, as C. S. Lewis vividly portrayed in That Hideous Strength, the third volume of the so-called Space Trilogy.)


17 posted on 05/18/2016 2:43:17 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Thing is, Trump is upending the design. The designers are starting to panic.


18 posted on 05/18/2016 4:00:11 PM PDT by Rennes Templar (President Trump: It's all over but the counting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: YogicCowboy

Where’s Mr. Bultitude when you need him? Since we can’t access Merlin to call down Glund, Lurga, Malacandra, Perelandra, and Viritrilbia...


19 posted on 05/18/2016 9:46:16 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson