Posted on 05/12/2016 11:35:24 PM PDT by aquila48
Calling all feminist activists, nudists, Cleveland-based Democrats, and people overdue for a laundry day. Photographer Spencer Tunick is looking for 100 bold women to pose nude for a Cleveland-based photo shoot on July 17, 2016.
Also — you’ll be baring all at the Republican National Convention.
If you’re not familiar with Tunick’s work, allow me to briefly summarize: naked people, lots of them. Since the 1990s, Tunick has organized over 70 massive photo shoots in locations spanning the globe, in which hundreds or thousands of people strip down to revel in the glory of unmediated human flesh. In the artist’s words: “individuals en masse, without their clothing, grouped together, metamorphose into a new shape.“
Snapped from a distance, his final images often resemble a skin-colored mountain range or fleshy ocean waves. Individual body types are lost to the overwhelming impact of the naked whole.
For this particular shoot, titled “Everything She Says Means Everything,” 100 naked women will hold up large mirror discs that, according to the artist’s website, represent “reflecting the knowledge and wisdom of progressive women and the concept of ‘Mother Nature’” onto the convention center where the RNC is taking place.
(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...
Just as “Manny the Hippie” once replied to the question of
him going naked; “MAN! I look better in threads!”
Tunick is sooooo yesterday.
The reason clothes were invented is because fully 95% of all human beings should be covered at all times. The exempt 5% are hot women between 18 and 22 years of age.
Flabdance!
Maybe the fat ugly bad toothed hag of a phb-ette sys-admin of a few years ago will be there. It would be the only way anyone would want to see her like that. How she was married twice and had a kid is beyond my comprehension.
Just, PLEASE, no participation by Trigglypuff. . . .
. . . assuming the sidewalk or road won’t buckle under her. . .
Warning: This will NOT be voyeur porn. Considering that these are liberals we’re talking about, it is more likely to be eye pollution. Expect a lot of flab, hairy armpits, and a haven for cellulite. Think Trigglypuff in her union suit.
Ha! Great point. But under Obama, you’re a woman if you feel like being one today. Like Bruce Jenner
CELLULITE TSUNAMI!
OMG. Except for the extra poundage, that reminds me of the photos taken at Nazi death camps.
Hmmm being liberals I do not see any “Diversity” promoted here.
To shut ‘em down fast, just point, snicker, and then belly-roll laugh at them.
Looks more like a photo of cattle than humans.
Rather than seeing these people as enlightened or unburdened by unnecessary clothing, I view them as defective, thinking the usage of clothing makes them something less.
No, the usage of clothing makes them something more.
It holds in suspense that which otherwise would be available for free and thus of very little value.
Clothing elevates the species.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.