Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Bridge for sale! And, with a 'straight' face too.
1 posted on 05/09/2016 8:32:42 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: rktman
HRC: “This is a security review that was requested, it is being carried out, it will be resolved.”

In order to understand this statement, it needs to be parsed, as we need to do in all Clinton scandals.

“This is a security review..” What is “this”? Is “this” an FBI probe, an investigation by the State Department IG, or a DoJ investigation?

“...that was requested...” Who requested the “security review”? Hillary herself? The DoJ? The FBI? The State Department? Any number of intelligence organizations? What Federal agency does a “security review”?

“....it is being carried out...” What is “it”? Is “it” a formal investigation? Who is carrying “it” out? Specifically, what Federal agencies or Legislative entities are carrying out something along the lines of a “security review”?

“....it will be resolved....” Again, what is “it”, how will “it” be “resolved”, and what is the final product to demonstrate that “it” is “resolved”? Could “resolved” mean convening a Federal Grand Jury, or selecting a special prosecutor, or going to trial, or getting a conviction, or sentencing someone for a crime?

Where are the so-called investigative reporters who exercise their precious intellectual curiosity? ::::CRICKETS::::

Paging Bob Woodward - come out of your coma and look into this!

Let’s not confuse the ephemeral of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy with the actual breaking of laws.

“This is a security review that was requested, it is being carried out, it will be resolved.” Who or what is the basis of Hillary’s emphatic declaration? How does she know this?

These are rhetorical questions to point out that everything Hillary says needs to be parsed from her legal-speak, couched comments.

32 posted on 05/09/2016 8:57:50 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Why should she care...

She took 900 FBI files and no one cared (probably because she had the FBI files of those who should have cared)

(One of Nixon’s staff went to jail for having ONE FBI file)


35 posted on 05/09/2016 8:59:45 AM PDT by Mr. K (Trump will win NY state - choke on that HilLIARy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman; All

Those 900 FBI files she took must still be paying off...

Most of those same people are STILL IN THE GOVERNMENT


36 posted on 05/09/2016 9:00:36 AM PDT by Mr. K (Trump will win NY state - choke on that HilLIARy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Clinton: ‘I Always Take Classified Material Seriously’

And yet she joked about wiping her server with a cloth or something.


40 posted on 05/09/2016 9:05:26 AM PDT by McGruff (#DumpRyan - Tell Paul Ryan, you're fired!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Serious dollars to be made selling the information to the enemy, is what she means.


43 posted on 05/09/2016 9:09:19 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Calling Obama a POS is a major insult to S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

of course she takes it seriously....OUR SECRETS that she sold to foreign enemy govts. has made the Clintons MULTI MULTI MILLIONAIRES!!


44 posted on 05/09/2016 9:10:06 AM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Clinton: ‘I Always Take Classified Material Seriously home."

There, fixed it.

47 posted on 05/09/2016 9:13:55 AM PDT by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Again, classic Clinton style tactics. It gets old with everyone but the media and the DNC.


48 posted on 05/09/2016 9:17:51 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
And so does Sandy Berger.

He literally "takes it", Seriously.

49 posted on 05/09/2016 9:19:04 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

She belidves she is not lying. She stripped off the classified header info, so she never had any classified material pass through her server.

She is a demented rationalizing lawyer that got fired for being too much of a demented rationalizing lawyer.


50 posted on 05/09/2016 9:19:48 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman; 11th Commandment; pgyanke; mkjessup; dfwgator; Zathras; austinaero; tflabo; 1Old Pro; ...
What a load of crap.

I read this book years ago, and just read it again last weekend: "Unlimited Access" by Gary Aldrich

Gary Aldrich was the FBI person in the White House for both the HW Bush and Clinton administrations who was responsible for putting together the SPIN reports which were used to grant or deny security access, and his assessment in his book published in 1998 details the Clinton Administration's attitude towards security, from all the way at the top the the people at the very bottom, was threefold:

1.) Security was a nuisance and uneccessary.

2.) Security was a personal affront

3.) Security of all types, from wearing security badges, getting approval for appointments or hires, or document security, was to be circumvented at every junction possible.

If you read this book, the actions of Hillary Clinton circumventing LAW are shown to be part and parcel of her character. Her email server activities are right in line.

Not to mention her attitudes and criminal behavior.

If you haven't read this book, I highly suggest it.

51 posted on 05/09/2016 9:20:36 AM PDT by rlmorel ("Irrational violence against muslims" is a myth, but "Irrational violence against non-muslims" isn't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
“I always took classified material seriously,” Clinton said

"And who would want this information and how much is it worth?"

52 posted on 05/09/2016 9:22:42 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

“...classified that was sent or received by me. And I look forward to this being wrapped up.” So that I can get back to work for the American People.


54 posted on 05/09/2016 9:24:46 AM PDT by Yaelle (Tinkerbelle glittering up the runway for Trump Force One!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
“There was never any material marked classified that was sent or received by me......

SoS? No classified material? G I V E_ M E _A_BREAK

59 posted on 05/09/2016 9:27:40 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
“There was never any material marked classified that was sent or received by me......

SoS? No classified material? G I V E_ M E _A_BREAK

61 posted on 05/09/2016 9:29:19 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Correctly Punctuated: I always take Classified Material. Seriously, there’s no argument about that.


63 posted on 05/09/2016 9:35:22 AM PDT by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

‘I Always Take Classified Material Seriously. There’s No Argument About That’

Just look at how much Money I got for it, damn right I took it serious!


64 posted on 05/09/2016 9:39:18 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Hillary Clinton is a lying, thieving, bullying, dirty little snot.


65 posted on 05/09/2016 9:40:16 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Anyone else notice that whenever she needs to counter anything negative she immediately gets on Meet the Press and spouts her nonsense?


68 posted on 05/09/2016 9:52:17 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

There must be some argument since there is an FBI investigation in progress, and has been for about a year.


70 posted on 05/09/2016 10:04:22 AM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson