Posted on 05/07/2016 4:46:09 PM PDT by Lucas McCain
The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
I think Judges Napolitano and Pirro would be surprised to learn that this were true.
I have promised $100 to FR if the witch is indicted and $1000 if she is convicted. I know my money is safe, even if this report is untrue.
That’s what they found, because they passed the evidence.
“Officials tell us”
Could just be Democrat Party officials.
What does the FBI say?
Like Trump says....others did far less and got punished, greatly. He also said they’d likely cover for her.
SOunds like an edict from the State Controlled Media:
“We are at war with Oceania. We have ALWAYS been at war with Oceania”.
This sounds like their standard lies.
Meh, I’m not too concerned about this.
They’re trying to WILL it away, good luck with that.
When you see the law no longer protects you from the corrupt, but protects the corrupt from you, you know your nation is doomed.
Ayn Rand
Wait...let me get my surprised face. I know it’s here somewhere, lol.
I don’t think they will do any thing to Hill. Ever..for anything.
If you think this Justice Dept is going to prosecute Hillary Clinton you better think again. The beautiful people do not prosecute other beautiful people.
Did anyone here REALLY think Hillary would have to answer for this? REALLY?
What a bunch of bs.
If you strip classified info of security headers and pass the rest along, that is criminal activity. Doing it once could land a normal peon in jail.
About as reliable as BLS reports!
CASE IN POINT The head of a Canadian company with an enormous interest in Africa....in the Congo's mining and oil sector.....Lukas Lundin of Lundin Mining....... announced a $100 million donation to the Clinton Foundation on the heels of Hillary/s first presidential campaign....as she became Secy of State.
After the Congolese government attempted to regain control of its own mines, the State Department intervened on behalf of Lundin Mining and another mining company, Freeport Mines, also a Clinton foundation donor.
A round of talks in 2010, thought to be aided by the Clinton State Department, concluded with the pair of well-connected companies (Clinton Foundation donors) retaining their stakes in the mines and with the Congolese government being shut out of its own resources. (hat tip Schweizer book---Clinton Cash)
==========================================
MEMO TO THE FBI----HERE/S THE PAPER TRAIL.
Hillary/s State Dept Aide Shared Classified state Dept Information With Clinton Foundation 2012 Email Shows Aide Cheryl Mills sent information marked confidential to Clinton Foundation / BY Alana Goodman, Free Beacon September 28, 2015
A key aide of Hillary Clinton emailed classified information about the government in Congo to a staffer at the Clinton Foundation in 2012, according to a copy of the correspondence obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.
Cheryl Mills, Clinton/s chief of staff at the State Department, sent the email to the Clinton Foundation’s foreign policy director, Amitabh Desai, on July 12, 2012.
The message, which was originally obtained by the group Citizens United through a public records request, is partially redacted because it includes foreign government information that has been classified Confidential by the State Department......but was not marked classified by the State Department until this past summer, intelligence sources tell the Free Beacon that it would have been classified at the time Mills sent it because foreign government information is considered classified from inception.
The message could add to concerns from congressional and FBI investigators about whether former Secretary Clinton and her aides mishandled classified information while at the State Department.
About half of the forwarded message was redacted due to its classified nature before the State Department released it to Citizens United last month. Although it is not clear what the redacted section includes, the State Department said in a court motion filed last week that it concerns both foreign government information and critical aspects of U.S. foreign relations, including U.S. foreign activities carried out by officials of the U.S. Government.
The State Department added that the disclosure of this information has the potential to damage and inject friction into our bilateral relationship with African countries whose cooperation is important to U.S. national security.
The Clinton Foundation and the State Department did not respond to request for comment about the email, or say whether Desai...a non-government employee who has worked at the foundation since 2007....would have been authorized to view Confidential information.
---SNIP---
REST AT http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-aide-shared-classified-information-with-foundation-email-shows/
It appears Obammie and Lynch have given the FBI guys their marching orders. Oh well, that will all change when Trump is elected.
NO source named —made up.
Same type of reaction after “Blue Dress” rumors surfaced:
“There’s NOTHING to this..! A NOTHINGburger..!!”
If there is any truth to the statement, or the one about “willful” wrongdoing, they are probably trying to lower her defenses before the interrogation with manipulative statements. It sounds very fake and I don’t seriously believe the FBI would admit it has spent a year investigating nothing.
The mere fact that these emails simply EXISTED on her private server breaks several Federal felony laws.
Ever wonder why there is so much time and attention to the e mails. Yet the fact that ~$30 million was “contributed” by foreign interests into Clinton’s foundation while she was Secretary of State is ignored.
Does the FBI usually give updates on an investigation? It is usually no comment on an ongoing investigation.
Smells like BS
===================================================
Fox/s Krauthammer said some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
Here's a concise summary the Clinton Foundation's tax free international money laundering scheme:
1. First, create a separate foreign “charity.”.......this one's in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments then donate to this Canadian charity......over 1,000 ontributed mega millions out of the goodness of their hearts expecting nothing in return. (Imagine Putin’s buddies deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles the separate mega-donations and makes one massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors. (Canadian officials dispute the claim)
5. The Clinton Foundation then “spends” some of this money for legitimate good works programs (observers believe not more than a measly 10%). The rest goes to enrich the Clinton’s, for salaries paid to untold numbers of political factotums, hangers on, and to fund the Clintons' lavish lifestyle, travel, etc...... all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.
6. The billion dollar Clinton Foundation can hire the world’s best accountants but somehow fails to report much of this funding on their tax filings. They allude to them as“clerical errors” and announce they are they are-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Include as a principal mining investor Frank Giustra, Clinton/s globe-trotting crony, who is central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia.
Net result — foreign money goes into the Clinton’s pockets tax free and is untraceable to the original donor.
This is the textbook definition of money laundering. Now you know why Hillary’s destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.
The Clintons could be back in the White House in January, 2017 unless people are informed. So inform and educate them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.