Posted on 05/03/2016 7:29:10 AM PDT by Talkradio03
It's nothing but praise from Mark Levin in this audio. He interviewed Donald Trump on his radio show and called him 'very impressive'...'Very solid' and 'very conservative.' Keep in mind, everything we know about Donald Trump today, was known then. Enjoy.
(Excerpt) Read more at hapblog.com ...
that should have said
Since when does a married man have a fiance?
Mark was perfectly happy with him until Stone pointed out his finance’s son’s connections to Cruz.
Since when does a married man have a finance?
After he’s divorced?
Ted Cruz has been exposed as the performer, and a bad one at that.
Donald Trump speaks from the heart.
The party elite are not the gatekeepers of who we can choose as our GOP nominee, and neither are you.
If you can't join this fight to help us win, at least take a break from your Trump-bashing so as to avoid helping Hillary.
Vote Trump
Levin showed his true colors, an apologist for the establishment that enables his obsolete radio program so he can earn big money selling books and being paid to bloviate. The conservative talkers make millions spewing a philosophy they clearly do not recognize when it is drawing audiences of tens of thousands right before their eyes. I refer anyone in doubt about Trump’s conservatism to the many excellent posts made here by The Boss.
I truly truly truly truly truly truly truly have never understood why all of a sudden all these conservatives went crazy anti Trump to a point of insanity...
I can understand maybe not liking Trump or preferring Cruz but this Trump is Hitler crap is nuts
If Trump was a Liberal, why wouldn't he run as one, and have the support of Hollywood? There wouldn't be any protests and the media would adore him. Why run as a secret Liberal?
Face it, Trump isn't a Liberal, unless you believe the definition put forth by the self proclaimed most Conservative man on earth.
Levin’s differences with Trump are on policy despite what you might hear from the Reynolds Wrap guy.
I’d rather have a moderate pro-american nationalist
then a “conservative” internationalist globalist
there’s a fundamental difference between being a generic “conservative” in the international sense (hell even head choping Islam in that sense could be called conservative as in Islamic conservative)
And an American conservative and Defender of what American Nation represents and the American people’s interest in the world
That’s easy. Trump decided about 8 years ago he wanted to be President. At that time he did some homework. He decided it would be easier to get the nomination in the R primary than the D primary. Coincidentally, Mr Trump became pro life about that time and did a 180 on banning scary black rifles.
About 4 years ago, despite criticising Romney for a “cruel” self deportation policy, Trump did some polling to find out how he could hook people clean and fast and decided on the wall.
From there it was easy. People fed up with government and political parties, the Wall for a committed base and then he hit on the brash bad boy thing.
Mr.Trump is a great salesman.
This was obviously before his son in law got a job on the Cruz campaign.
From there, Cruz appears to have morphed into a carefully crafted, self-designed weapon that's been deployed against conservatives and their reputations and credibility, especially those conservative talkers on AM radio.
My oh my how interesting are these times!
...and I bet they’ll both be on board with Trump after the convention. What will they do as an alternative, support Clinton? Okay, maybe they might and Trump would be better if they did as he sure doesn’t need their blessing or support.
__________________________
After Trump becomes President, their radio hosting days will come to an end as being irrelevant. Their insight into politics is not worth ones time.
Cruz won’t be his VP pick, I honestly would have a hard time voting for Trump if he picked Cruz, it would show that Trump is not prepared to make the right kind of changes.
Most presidents are pragmatic. Teddy Roosevelt “took” the site of the Panama Canal. Jefferson bought the Louisiana Purchase Territory. The list goes on and on.
Well, he didn’t appear under any performance pressure years ago when praising Trump as holding a conservative edge. Now (with many personal ties and incentives to support Cruz) he conveniently reverses upon previous pronouncements concerning Trump. Such an advantageous change of position.
Cruz probably won’t be his VP pick, I honestly would NOT have any problem voting for Trump if he picked Cruz, it would show that he’s got skin thicker than a dinosaur’s. People who pretend that they support Cruz would have a problem though.
The Panama Canal, as in a failed French engineering project, hampered by tropical diseases (22,000 deaths on the project). The US acquired project reliant upon Dr. Walter Reed’s expertise in tropical disease vectors, to achieve a healthy workforce, allowing the project to advance.
The US already had a stake in the region established by treaty, and had built a military administered railroad linking Atlantic and Pacific coasts: see Mallarino–Bidlack Treaty of 1846. Panama was a disease hellhole before improvements changed the character of the tropical jungle region. Once the area was in ascendency, a successful canal bringing prosperity, Columbia sought to claim the region.
The Panamanian separatist of the former New Granada, were in revolt against any claim of rule from Columbia; and, Teddy formally recognized them as a nation, blocking Colombian military entering the isthmus. Everyone wound up being paid by the US, even Columbia to relinquish further aggression.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
