Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI Confirms “Enforcement Proceeding” Against Hillary
Young Conservatives ^ | May 2, 2016 | Alicia Powe

Posted on 05/02/2016 6:31:31 AM PDT by xzins

The mainstream media has succeeded in covering up Hillary Clinton’s email scandal and it appears her supporters couldn’t care less about the corruption.

While it seems unlikely that Clinton will be hauled away in handcuffs anytime soon, a new filing by the Justice Department contains a phrase that suggests a criminal prosecution is being planned for the Democratic presidential frontrunner.

From The Federalist Papers:

In the ongoing battle to get access to the e-mails that Hillary sent, or received or tried to destroy, the Justice Department has been forced to respond or explain why certain emails must remain classified.

When a Vice News reporter formally protested the classification of an FBI decision explaining how sensitive information ended up on Hillary’s homebrew server, the Justice Department responded, explaining why:

“They responded in kind by saying they couldn’t make the document public because it would “adversely affect the ongoing investigation” into Clinton’s private email server.

Fair enough, but it is two words further into the DOJ memorandum that will be sure to raise some eyebrows. The department claims it can’t reveal the document because doing so could “reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.”

It’s those two words – “enforcement proceedings”– that may be telling. As Rusty Weiss explains, the phrase “enforcement proceedings” is used in federal law when an “investigation or proceeding involves a possible violation of criminal law.”

The FBI needs to finish this before November for the sake of the nation.

The Clintons are above the law and live by different rules than the rest of us.

General Petraeus or any other State Department official would be on trial already.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2016issues; 2good2betrue; clinton; enforcement; fbi; hillary2016; hillarycriminalprobe; hillaryscandals; indictment; soshillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: Snowybear

If Hillary was a man she’d be in prison.


21 posted on 05/02/2016 6:52:05 AM PDT by GOPJ (Imagine the shrieking MSM outrage if Trump supporters had tried to flip a car... David French)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I can't wait for the media to report Hitlery in jail, the liberal hardcore supporters, and asking Huma to ask her respond.
22 posted on 05/02/2016 6:52:17 AM PDT by keving (We get the government we vote elect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Agree.


23 posted on 05/02/2016 6:53:41 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TYVets

When I see her put in Cuffs and the Back of a Black Maria, I’ll Believe it.


24 posted on 05/02/2016 6:53:41 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: xzins

And this woman is running for president?


25 posted on 05/02/2016 6:54:07 AM PDT by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

It looks to me that the politicized DOJ wants to control the timing of this.

Remember a few weeks ago the FBI director said that he was under no obligation to finish prior to Democratic Convention.

IMHO, someone wants to control the timing to fit the planned narrative.


26 posted on 05/02/2016 6:54:44 AM PDT by FranklinsTower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
Obama probably will give the go-ahead to indict/prosecute Hillary at the most convenient time to create maximum chaos for the November election.

I suspect that around mid-September the "Justice" Department will announce that there's no indictment, as all the evidence pointed to total innocence. Then, in late-September Obama will officially endorse Hillary.

27 posted on 05/02/2016 6:56:02 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The Muslim overlords will not allow queen Hildabeast to be touched.


28 posted on 05/02/2016 6:56:15 AM PDT by MrBambaLaMamba (Wer Feuer frißt, scheißt Funken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
A violation of criminal law "may" have occurred. Nothing new, in other words.

I doubt the FBI will recommend any charges at all. Hillary is too elite a personae to face justice.

29 posted on 05/02/2016 7:00:03 AM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

I choose not to believe that. I’ve known Jim Comey since he was the US Attorney for the Southern District of NY and the Deputy Attorney General (the latter under a miserable and inept Attorney General, John Ashcroft). He has always been a very honest and principled man and, while I wouldn’t expect him to publicly fall on his sword, in the event of a whitewash, he’ll make his opinion clearly known in a very public way.


30 posted on 05/02/2016 7:00:39 AM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
Any of us would be hauled off the street for this.

Truth is, you and I would be hauled off, convicted and imprisoned for far less than this my friend.

31 posted on 05/02/2016 7:01:12 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: xzins

“It’s those two words – “enforcement proceedings”– that may be telling.”

If you’re mining for “gold” and all you can pan out is a couple of flecks then maybe it’s time to dig somewhere else.


32 posted on 05/02/2016 7:02:06 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Yeah? BS. Laws only apply to the peon schmucks, not Killary.


33 posted on 05/02/2016 7:02:18 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I have a new theory. Obama’s hatred of Clintons may be stronger than his loyalty to Democratic party. He will let her be prosecuted.


34 posted on 05/02/2016 7:03:47 AM PDT by Calvin Cooledge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Cooledge

It WOULD be the means to install his personal pick at the convention.


35 posted on 05/02/2016 7:05:08 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: xzins

They’ll perp walk her after her second term.

(WTF is taking so long?)


36 posted on 05/02/2016 7:09:48 AM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

“If Hillary was a man she’d be in prison.”

For some reason I thought of Ray Nagin, former Mayor of the Chocolate City. Looking him up it says he lost his appeal to the 10 year sentence given him.

At one point he was a Democrat darling.


37 posted on 05/02/2016 7:16:50 AM PDT by avenir (I'm pessimistic about man, but I'm optimistic about GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xzins

John Wayne voice: “ That’ll be the day.”


38 posted on 05/02/2016 7:22:23 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Rules don’t matter for rats.

I’ve seen clearly written election law violated in favor of rats in New Jersey (Toricelli) and my home state of Kansas (Taylor).

Rules and law simply don’t matter, as long as the courts are complicit.


39 posted on 05/02/2016 7:27:09 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
“[The Obamas]...will continue squatting in our White House [after January 2017]...”

No way, Obama is much too lazy for that. He cannot wait to leave the White House. You are giving him credit for a work ethic he does not have.

40 posted on 05/02/2016 7:27:18 AM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson