Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When You Ban the Sale of Ivory, You Ban Elephants
The Cato Institute ^ | January 21, 2013 | Doug Bandow

Posted on 04/30/2016 11:18:12 AM PDT by OddLane

Elephant poaching is rampant throughout Africa. Unfortunately, Western nations have exacerbated the problem by banning the sale of ivory. Elephants are dying as a result. The West should reopen the ivory trade.

Artists and artisans have used ivory for thousands of years. Unfortunately, there’s no easy way to get tusks off a live elephant. So in 1989 the international sale of new ivory products was prohibited. Concluded analyst Peter Fitzmaurice, “with most nations adhering closely to the ban, the legal ivory trade has been decimated and value of this natural resource for range countries has been vastly diminished.”

Nevertheless, the illegal trade continues. Asia is the prime destination, but last year two New York City jewelers pled guilty to trafficking in illegal ivory. An estimated 38,000 African elephants are being killed annually, “more than at any time in decades,” reported the New York Times. The elephant population dropped from some 1.3 million in 1979 to 470,000 or even fewer today.

(Excerpt) Read more at cato.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ivory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 04/30/2016 11:18:12 AM PDT by OddLane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OddLane

Why are there more cows in the US than buffalo?

Because cows are profitable, buffalo are not.

Bleeding hearts interfering with the market.


2 posted on 04/30/2016 11:22:34 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OddLane

I’ve visited East Africa several times...most recently earlier this year.I’ve talked to Kenyan,Tanzanian and South African game wardens and guides at some length about poaching.Every one of them has told me that the basic problem is that if a group of poachers manages to “bag” (my word) an elephant or rhino they can make the equivalent of 5 years wages for their home area.It’s the damn Chinese who want rhino horns (they think it enhances male virility...the stupid savages) and I’m not certain who wants ivory today.


3 posted on 04/30/2016 11:28:03 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obamanomics:Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OddLane

In general terms I agree that bans promote a black market that can be more detrimental than without a ban (but not necessarily).

But you could say the same thing about prostitution, child sex trafficking, drugs ... etc. Banning those things also encourages a black market to flourish because the commodity in question become harder to obtain, and therefore more valuable.

So I think the author needs to re-work his logic a little.


4 posted on 04/30/2016 11:37:54 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OddLane

I read recently that Cecil’s plight has led to a population explosion among young military-aged male lions living outside of prides.


5 posted on 04/30/2016 11:44:29 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Off the NWO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative; OddLane
So in 1989 the international sale of new ivory products was prohibited.
"I’m not certain who wants ivory today."

I'll give you one small market. In the Japanese tea ceremony (note: "chajin" means someone who practices the tea ceremony), there is a level of tea practice called karamono, which is when one is using a ceramic tea container originally made in ancient China. Instead of the usual bamboo tea scoop, when practicing karamono one is supposed to use an ivory tea scoop, which is what the ancient Chinese used in their version of the tea ceremony. I learned karamono about the time ivory production was banned, so I have never been able to obtain an ivory scoop for myself. ( is a close-up picture of one.)

6 posted on 04/30/2016 11:47:22 AM PDT by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Government sanctions against the private ownership of a stupendous range of plants, animals and minerals has created a decimation of the environments in which these items are found.
Here in Florida many species of fish and reptiles are banned from import in the foolish presumption that their ownership in private hands will upset some supposed balance of nature. Never mind Florida is home to species from the entire earth, all living in relative harmony.
Why do governments ban private ownership? Because they can.


7 posted on 04/30/2016 11:49:53 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (Stop Islam and save the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
" if a group of poachers manages to “bag” (my word) an elephant or rhino they can make the equivalent of 5 years wages"

Yes, but making ivory more scarce drives up the price. It might not be 5 years of wages if it were managed instead of banned.

8 posted on 04/30/2016 11:50:00 AM PDT by Da Bilge Troll (Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears; OddLane
Why are there more cows in the US than buffalo?

Because cows are profitable, buffalo are not.

There were once more buffalo than cows and buffalo were profitable. People shot all the buffalo until there were almost none left.

The only reason this doesn't happen with cows is that they are domesticated and purposely bred in very large numbers for eventual slaughter. Do we really want to do that with elephants?

9 posted on 04/30/2016 11:58:18 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
Do we really want to do that with elephants?

Soon we should be able to genetically grow the full sized tusks....on mice.

10 posted on 04/30/2016 12:00:16 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Canadians can't be President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OddLane

And to make matters worse for the elephants, our gov’t destroyed ivory pieces already in circulation, decreasing supply and causing price and demand to rise. Fools!


11 posted on 04/30/2016 12:05:37 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

“It’s the damn Chinese who want rhino horns (they think it enhances male virility...the stupid savages) and I’m not certain who wants ivory today.”

Clearly, an ethnic group “bigger” than Chinese...


12 posted on 04/30/2016 12:14:04 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (BREAKING.... Vulgarian Resistance begins attack on the GOPe Death Star.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I don’t really see your comparison. Ivory could be considered an investment that could increase in value, whereas drugs and prostitution, not so much.


13 posted on 04/30/2016 12:19:43 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Ivory, both raw and “worked”, is still a major social and status symbol in Asia, especially in countries with rapidly growing economies and middle/upper classes that have money for “conspicuous consumption”.

Within the last few months one of the East African countries (Kenya? Tanzania?) chose to destroy tens of millions of dollars (or more) worth of illegal ivory that had been captured and impounded. I recall thinking how stupid and unthinking it was to burn it instead of dumping it on the market...selling it would have benefited the national economy, collapsed the illegal market, and probably filled the Asian demand for years if not decades.


14 posted on 04/30/2016 12:19:53 PM PDT by M1903A1 ("W shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy... and call it progress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

I was comparing them in a supply/demand context. Less supply, greater demand. This is why so many people got rich during prohibition (also there is the allure of the taboo).


15 posted on 04/30/2016 12:21:21 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

No, we don’t want to do that with elephants, and I say that not only as an elephant lover but from a practical standpoint. Elephants have long gestation periods and don’t reproduce as much as cows. Elephants eat a lot and the tusks don’t even begin to grow until 2 or 3 yrs. Of age.


16 posted on 04/30/2016 12:27:30 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

well you’re right there. Also making prostitution and drugs illegal leads to more crime.


17 posted on 04/30/2016 12:31:04 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
In general terms I agree that bans promote a black market that can be more detrimental than without a ban (but not necessarily). But you could say the same thing about prostitution, child sex trafficking, drugs ... etc. Banning those things also encourages a black market to flourish because the commodity in question become harder to obtain, and therefore more valuable. So I think the author needs to re-work his logic a little.

Depends on what you mean by "ban." There's punishment, of whatever level. And then there's "we'll hunt you down and kill you." Adults indulging in mutually agreed upon but proscribed behaviour like prostitution, dangerous drugs, etc, is the former thing.

Forced or child prostitution, slavery, etc., is the latter thing, or should be.

18 posted on 04/30/2016 1:04:39 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OddLane
Well there is no shortage of elephants here in Thailand. Even had one stick her head into our store last year. Every November there is a Surin Elephant round up.

http://event-carnival.com/thailand/surins-elephant-roundup

19 posted on 04/30/2016 1:15:27 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage? (Held my nose to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

BTTT.


20 posted on 04/30/2016 1:15:34 PM PDT by OddLane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson