Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tactics (Ping list)
Townhall.com ^ | April 29, 2016 | Mike Adams

Posted on 04/29/2016 5:00:50 AM PDT by Kaslin

It is beyond dispute that the left is winning the current culture war and doing so by a landslide. In response to this reality I’ve heard many conservatives say we just need to start making better arguments for our positions. Nothing could be further from the truth. We are not losing because our arguments are inferior. We are losing because of tactics rather than substance. Put simply, the left has learned how to do two things: 1) Control the language in the national debate 2) Get their ideas disseminated and accepted without any evidentiary basis.

There is one Christian apologist who understood this problem long before anyone else. His name is Greg Koukl and he is president of the California based apologetics group “Stand to Reason.” Through his cogent writings, Greg has taught me a valuable lesson that each and every culture warrior needs to know: When someone attacks your ideas or tries to push a false idea on you, start asking questions before you try to make your case.

This advice proved helpful to me when I was recently attacked by a friend who holds contrary political views. Knowing that I teach a course called “First Amendment and Crime,” he suddenly hit me with this accusatory question, which I found to be somewhat insulting: “How do you control your bias when you teach a class like that?”

As someone who has long criticized professors who indoctrinate rather than teach I did not appreciate my friend’s suggestion that I was “one of them.” In fact, it irritated me. So I took a deep breath and asked the first question in a series of three questions Koukl recommends to help get back in the drivers’ seat whenever we are caught off guard in any argument:

1. What do you mean by that?

2. How did you arrive at that conclusion?

3. Have you ever considered the following?

Notice the brilliance of Koukl’s technique. Writing for an audience of people who subscribe to a Christian worldview, he’s telling them to hold off on presenting their affirmative case (in question #3) until they have done two things. First, make sure your opponent understands his terms (question #1). Next, find out whether his argument has any evidentiary basis (question #2).

In the case of my friend who accused me of engaging in biased indoctrination in the classroom, I simply asked, “What do you mean by bias?” Surprisingly, he was able to respond with an accurate definition of bias. To paraphrase him slightly, he defined bias as “only teaching or presenting material that conforms to your beliefs.”

Since he made it through the first question I then asked, “How did you arrive at the conclusion that I am a biased teacher?” His response was fatal to his argument. To once again paraphrase him slightly, he said, “I just assumed you were biased because you’re so conservative.” This set up the kill shot, which was delivered by asking, “Have you ever considered that accusing a person of bias without any evidentiary basis is itself a form of bias?”

It should go without saying that he had no response other than turning red and swallowing nervously. He was obviously embarrassed when he lost control of the argument by having his own terminology used against him. There’s a lesson in that – particularly for those arguing unpopular positions in the debate over so-called gay rights.

Koukl’s three-question technique, which he calls the Colombo tactic, was something one of my former students needed the other day when a gay rights issue (concerning North Carolina’s HB2) came up in the workplace. While at work, she got an email that said the following (this is a paraphrased and condensed version):

Dear (company name withheld) employees:

Recently, there has been much controversy over North Carolina’s HB2, which promotes bigotry and intolerance. We are writing today to reaffirm our commitment to inclusion and to applaud the efforts of companies such as PayPal that have decided to respond aggressively to these basic violations of human rights and human decency. Our company is steadfastly opposed to measures such as HB2 and we intend to respond appropriately in the near future.

My former student’s co-workers began responding to the email in a predictable fashion. They all supported their company’s stance against HB2. But my former student had a different view. So what could she do? And more generally what should people with her views do in response to a similar email? Of course, applying the Colombo tactic is the only reasonable response. And here is how a model response would look:

1. What do you mean by “bigotry and intolerance?” The first response should force the proponent to define the terms he uses in the email. Assuming he could do so the next question would be easy.

2. How did you arrive at the conclusion that HB2 promotes bigotry and intolerance? This question will reveal whether the opponent of HB2 actually read the bill before condemning it. This provides a perfect set up for the kill question.

3. Have you ever considered the possibility that PayPal’s decision to do business with five nations that execute people for the “crime” of homosexuality promotes bigotry and intolerance? And have you also considered the possibility that applauding PayPal for its refusal to do business with North Carolina, a state that does not criminalize homosexuality, undermines our professed commitment to diversity and inclusion?

Game over, ladies and gentlemen. There simply is no way for the anti-HB2 crusaders to recover from that one. Of course, there is the possibility that such an exchange could cause you to win the argument but lose your job. But that brings up another issue altogether. It will be the subject of a future column.

In the meantime, I recommend clicking here and reading Tactics immediately.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: arguing; bathroom; bathroombill; frontpage; itsnotthateasy; tactics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Kaslin

I would suggest passive activity is a losing tactic..

We must attack and the mode of attack is massive FREep. We must get off our lazy butts and resume bringing the message in the streets


41 posted on 04/29/2016 8:37:51 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
I like that tactic. I wish I could think faster on my feet, but...

Practice makes perfect!

42 posted on 04/29/2016 8:49:51 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

Much appreciated! Worth looking into for further study.


43 posted on 04/29/2016 8:50:47 AM PDT by Vision Thing (painfully mathematically eliminaTED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Oh, go ahead and make me feel bad!
Nano abuse!!!

I was always amazed by by a Tex-Mex guy that worked for me, many years. He was always the first in the room to ‘get’ a joke.
To pick up the subtle nuances so quickly, and English was not his first language.


44 posted on 04/29/2016 8:54:33 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (Looks like it's pretty hairy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT
The better ones that I used in Asia, are a combo of squat toilet and shower. The only issue I had with them is, you must maintain situational awareness of your feet. A very economical use of space.

Didn't it stink while showering, though? Wasn't there the probability of germ transmission?

45 posted on 04/29/2016 8:55:55 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

Nice. Thanks for the ping.


46 posted on 04/29/2016 9:04:09 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Keep calm and Pray on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Heart of Georgia
The sign on the wall needs to be fixed by changing the descriptive word from “inclusive” to “REPULSIVE”

Or "TRANSGRESSIVE." They'd think it's a compliment unless they looked it up.

47 posted on 04/29/2016 9:08:06 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
And when they can't defend their positions then regardless of how ill-thought out they are, they will just switch the subject ignore the facts, try to shout you down. But they won't change their minds

You don't think all those idiots out there trying to, say, shut down a Trump rally, have thought out their positions. No, their heart is in the wrong place.

Leftism, socialism is the politics of envy.

48 posted on 04/29/2016 9:37:59 AM PDT by chesley (The right to protest is not the right to disrupt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
In the end, the paucity of the ubermensch ideology WAS exposed, for all the world to see.

However, that didn't do much good for the 6 million who were exterminated. Sadly, it didn't even teach the world a lesson, because here we are on the precipice again.

49 posted on 04/29/2016 9:41:07 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thanks for the ping Kaslin.


50 posted on 04/29/2016 9:43:36 AM PDT by upchuck (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable. ~ JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What Adams experienced with his “friend” was the typical virtual lib head explosion when logic and reason are injected into the discussion where the other party is driven by the emotions of the moment. An excellent article and a basic short course in apologetics, rhetoric, and effective argumentation. This one is headed for a save in the permanent files. Thanks for the post and ping!


51 posted on 04/29/2016 9:45:20 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

Thanks!

Great suggestions I will try to adopt!


52 posted on 04/29/2016 9:55:06 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

Well, it’s worth a shot. I have had better success with the cat than progressives.


53 posted on 04/29/2016 9:56:37 AM PDT by yuleeyahoo ( Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him. - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10154142560992486&set=a.126171447485.104403.585332485&type=3&theater

here’s another answer to the vexing “tranny-gotta-go” dilemma


54 posted on 04/29/2016 10:02:12 AM PDT by ThirstyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Even when a liberal’s argument is shredded with logic, they’ll resort to emotionalism. “Well, I just don’t FEEL the same way you do about that.”

Feelings trump logic with liberals. Just look what’s happening on college campuses with the “safe zones” where the free speech of conservatives is stifled.


55 posted on 04/29/2016 10:10:17 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Excellent article, Kaslin.


56 posted on 04/29/2016 11:30:30 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Good point. Leftism is all about power. If they can make you submit using arguments, they will use arguments. If arguments don’t work, they will try intimidation. If intimidation doesn’t work, they will try to destroy you, either overtly or covertly.


57 posted on 04/29/2016 12:30:00 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

When I was in Asia all restrooms and baths were coed. It took a while but I got used to it.
One incident stands out. When on a Japanese island my crew and I were relaxing in the large hot bath when a group of school girls came in. They were laughing and giggling and pointing at one of my men. It wasn’t because of his nakedness but because of his hairiness. He had long black hair all over his body.


58 posted on 04/29/2016 1:03:48 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

Thank you. It was.


59 posted on 04/29/2016 1:10:26 PM PDT by 70times7 (Serving Free Republics' warped and obscure humor needs since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I faster method to resolve this new “bathroom” issue is simple.

JUST REFUSE TO SHOP THERE.

And, refuse to allow your children to enter into any public bathroom without you being present.

I view this as a direct assault against our female population (adult and child).

If enough people will refuse to shop at these stores who are going to use this new policy .. you will see them screaming and yelling to get their customers back.

There are plenty of places to shop .. or you can do what a lot of us do - shop online. The more pressure we exert, the faster this horrible mess will be stopped.


60 posted on 04/29/2016 5:41:42 PM PDT by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson