Posted on 04/26/2016 4:30:58 AM PDT by HomerBohn
The criminal depths to which police will sink to bolster their budgets, apparently have no limit, as a recent case of police theft in Oklahoma illustrates. To keep society safe, sheriff’s deputies in Muskogee County, Oklahoma robbed a church and an orphanage of $53,000. Real American heroes.
Eh Wah, 40, a refugee from Burma, who became a US citizen more than a decade ago, was traveling with the cash to deliver it to the intended recipients when he was targetted by modern day, state-sanctioned pirates — for a broken tail light.
Eh Wah had been entrusted with the money by the members of his Christian band who had been on a 19-city tour raising funds for the Dr. T. Thanbyah Christian Institute, a religious liberal arts college in Burma serving the Karen community there. And, they had also collected funds for the Hsa Thoo Lei orphanage in Thailand, which serves internally displaced Karen people.
Clearly a vulnerable host for their parasitic process, Eh Wah’s English was incompatible with that of the deputies’ and he was accused of trafficking drugs. A K9 was called to the scene, and, naturally, alerted to the vehicle. As the Free Thought Project has reported in the past, drug dogs will alert to your vehicle nearly every single time they are brought out regardless of actually having drugs or not.
In spite of the fact that not one single bit of contraband was found, Eh Wah was brought to the police station and interrogated for hours. Police even called one of Eh Wah’s friends in the band who confirmed the story, but the cops, with dollar signs in their eyes, still believed that his story was “inconsistent.”
Eh Wah was then released without charges and sent on his way — police kept his cash, and Eh Wah kept his broken tail light.
In an interview with the Washington Post, Eh Wah’s attorney, Dan Alban, noted that while the deputies took all of the cash, they left Eh Wah a check written out to him for $300 from a family friend.
“If they really thought these were drug proceeds and they thought he was a drug trafficker, why would they give back a check that they thought was drug proceeds?” Alban asked. But, he said, “if the real purpose of the stop was to increase revenue, there’s no point in keeping the check because they can’t cash the check.”
In an apparent attempt to justify their lowlife theft from an orphanage, five weeks after he was stopped, Muskogee County authorities eventually charged Eh Wah with a crime. They issued a warrant for his arrest April 5, for the crime of “acquir[ing] proceeds from drug activity, a felony.” For probable cause, the authorities noted the positive alert from the drug dog, “inconsistent stories” and, according to the Post, said Eh Wah was “unable to confirm the money was his.”
And we call this process ‘justice’ in the Land of the Free.
For decades now, the federal government and their cohorts in law enforcement have been carrying out theft of the citizenry on a massive scale. We’re not talking about taxes, but an insidious power known as Civil Asset Forfeiture (CAF).
The 1980’s-era laws were ostensibly designed to drain resources from powerful criminal organizations, but CAF has become a tool for law enforcement agencies across the U.S. to steal money and property from countless innocent people.
It was CAF, which allowed the Muskogee County deputies to legally pilfer from an orphanage without any worry of recourse or accountability.
No criminal charge is required for this confiscation, resulting in easy inflows of cash for law enforcement departments and the proliferation of abuse. This is called “policing for profit.”
In the last 25 years, the amount of “profit” stolen through CAF has skyrocketed.
According to the US Department of Justice, the value of asset forfeiture recoveries by US authorities from 1989-2010 was $12,667,612,066, increasing on average 19.5% per year.
In 2008, law enforcement took over $1.5 billion from the American public. While this number seems incredibly large, just a few years later, in 2014, that number tripled to nearly $4.5 billion.
When we examine these figures and their almost exponential growth curve, it appears that police in America are getting really good at separating the citizen from their property — not just really good, criminally good.
To put this number into perspective, according to the FBI, victims of burglary offenses suffered an estimated $3.9 billion in property losses in 2014.
That means that law enforcement in America has stolen $600,000,000 more from Americans than actual criminal burglars.
When police surpass the criminal accomplishments of those they claim to protect you from, there is a serious problem.
When police can publicly steal from charitable organizations and orphanages in the name of the war on drugs, it is time society reassess who the criminals are.
The good news is that Americans are waking up to this Orwellian notion of police robbing the citizens, and they are taking a stand.
Even police officers are taking a stand against CAF. In an exclusive interview in September of last year, the Free Thought Project talked to officer Stephen Mills, chief of police at the Apache, Oklahoma police department. Mills became an outspoken advocate against CAF after he became a victim of it.
The idea of thieving cops has also united organizations on opposite ends of the political spectrum. In October, the ACLU and the Koch Brothers came together to stop the inherent police theft in America.
While the police keep grabbing your property, it is important to remain vigilant. Only through a lesser ignorance and the spreading of information will we overcome this blatant tyranny. Please share this article with your friends and family to wake them up to the criminal reality that is – civil asset forfeiture.
how do we know this money was destined for a church and orphanage?
It details that in the article.
More importantly, why is a person’s money fair game for the government to take without due process?
“how do we know this money was destined for a church and orphanage?”
How does that change things? They stole his money.
How do we know you aren’t involved in criminal enterprise and shouldn’t have your assets confiscated and be jailed? You have a lot of nerve, criminal that you are, to even comment on this case.
I agree, they stole his money. No drugs were found and no crime, that I can see, was committed. Some of our police and government officials try take as much as they can from the citizens. Lord help us, I am afraid it is only going to get worse.
What business is it of the government's where his money came from or what he planned to use it for? In this society, we don't punish someone unless they have been convicted of a crime.
If he were planning a terrorist attack and these funds were to buy bombs, then he should be tried and convicted on this charge. Then and only then should his funds be confiscated.
I don’t really damn care. They stole his money for a broken tail light! If they do it to him, they can do it to anybody!
After a legal battle you can try to get it back,
What are you implying?
Then, with that train of thought- when a police officer guns down an innocent bystander or a family pet; us proles should be able to legally return fire on said police officer..........
(S)
Still pisses me off that this state sanctioned theft occurs.
We don’t. Nor is there proof of how the money was obtained. But it makes a great one sided propaganda piece. All a person has to do is show the money was legitimately obtained, even if it is gambling winnings there is a receipt, and the government returns the money with interest.
“how do we know this money was destined for a church and orphanage?”
If it’s going somewhere illegal, that’s for the government to prove before a jury.
Lawyers and politicians and thieves. But then I repeat myself.
i agree that the government seizure of the money would seem to violate due process, however i am not sure i believe his claims either. that’s all i’m saying. i am not defending the government...asset seizure, eminent domain, bot h could use serious reforms
What you said is absolutely not true.
To get the money back you must litigate against the municipality that took it. that costs a lot of money right there.
They are not obligated to return it, and make much effort to keep it.
In our country we don’t have to “show the money was legitimately obtained”. The burden is on the police to show it WAS NOT legitimately obtained.
USA, RIP.
“All a person has to do...”
That or your “one sided propaganda piece” quip independently reveal you as a police-state big-government statist. We both know it’s never a quick trip to the bank or business or, in this case, the church / orphanage in the next week. And we both know that typically the first pro-forma hearing is adjudicated by the same agency that just did the stealing, and is also typically delayed by some number of months. And all proceeds are minus attorney fees and lost work, of course.
This has been going on for what, 30 years now? And people expect it to change? Face it, they yelled “Drug War” and the American people gave it up faster than a drunk prom date. Of course, we thought they would only ever do it to “those” people, but here we are.
Muskogee has since agreed to return the money which they should IMO. Oklahoma tried to get a law passed limiting CAFs but the LEO in Oklahoma raised so much hell over it that it died in committee. If you’re found innocent you can get your property back but the cost of attorneys to do so often makes it prohibitive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.