Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First pictures of Russia's T-50 PAK FA fighter fitted with air-to-surface weapons
Air Recognition ^ | 13 April 2016

Posted on 04/13/2016 10:52:41 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

According to pictures released on the internet, Russia's Sukhoi T-50 PAK FA fighter aircraft started flight test campaign armed with air-to-surface weapons. These tests took place at the Gromov Flight Research Institute, located at the Zhukovsky Air Base.

Russia's PAK FA T-50-2 prototype fitted with two Kh-31 air-to-surface missiles (Credit: Alex S/russianplanes.net)

Pictures unveiled on the russianplanes website first showed the T-50-2 prototype fitted with Kh-31 anti-ship missiles. A second series of pictures unveiled a few days before show the same prototype aircraft performing a test flight armed with two Kh-31 anti-ship missiles. The Kh-31, also dubbed X-31 in Russia, is a Russian air-to-surface missile. It can reach a Mach 3.5 max speed, depending on variants. Its warhead is equipped with a 94kg HE shaped charge. The Kh-31 has an operational range of up to 110 km.

A few days later, the website released pictures showing the same aircraft fitted with 6 free fall bombs. The PAK FA previously had only performed flight tests with air-to-air missiles.

Russia's T-50 PAK FA is a fifth-generation fighter programme of the Russian Air Force. The T-50 prototype first flew on 29 January 2010 and the first production aircraft is slated for delivery to the Russian Air Force starting in late 2016 or early 2017. Yuri Borisov, Russia's deputy minister of defence for armaments stated in 2015 that the Air Force will slow PAK FA production and reduce its initial order of 150 aircraft to 12 jets due to the nation's deteriorating economy, along with the manufacturer's ability to produce the more complex aircraft.

The same T-50-2 prototype aircraft now armed with six unguided bombs

(Credit: Evgeny Volkov/russianplanes.net)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; pakfa; russia; t50
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 04/13/2016 10:52:42 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
I don't know if it'll live up to expectations, but IMHo, it's a beautiful plane.
2 posted on 04/13/2016 10:57:35 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I’d love to see that thing in action.


3 posted on 04/13/2016 11:01:03 PM PDT by RedWulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin
"I don't know if it'll live up to expectations, but IMHo, it's a beautiful plane."

For 1970's tech, it is.

4 posted on 04/13/2016 11:02:46 PM PDT by Spitzensparkin1 (Arrest and deport all illegal aliens. Americans demand those jobback! Whoorah, Arizona!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

Why do all or most of Russia’s aircraft look suspiciously like our prior model and in this case, the F-22?


5 posted on 04/13/2016 11:16:55 PM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Why does every totalitarian, political hack think that he knows how to run my life better than I?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedWulf

“I’d love to see that thing in action.”

You may get your chance if Russia’s jet fighters keep buzzing our destroyers.


6 posted on 04/13/2016 11:18:17 PM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Why does every totalitarian, political hack think that he knows how to run my life better than I?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spel_grammer_an_punct_polise

Its highly unlikely you will see one of these sent to buzz any foreign warship or aircraft at least for the next decade. You wouldn’t want your enemies to get a real close look (electronic surveillance) of your latest and greatest assets.

The recent buzzing of the USS Donald Cook involved SU-24s, which ceased production in 1993 — that means it would be older than most of the folks on the ship or even the pilots flying them!


7 posted on 04/13/2016 11:55:54 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: spel_grammer_an_punct_polise
I'm sure they look at what works, but, there's also the fact that design thought in aerodynamics seems to come in waves with everyone reaching similar configurations based on the latest advances in what works with what's possible. If they see something already working no doubt they avoid a lot of what they may have tried otherwise and the similarity increases.

Sorta like at one time everyone had planes similar to the the Bee Gee, then poof, that was gone and if you mention it around younger folks they say, "The band ? Don't you mean BeeGees? They had an airplane?"

Then again, if you can get the design work someone else has done already and start with that, sure, why start from scratch and try things that have been tried and rejected for good reasons? Lenin knew where to buy rope, everyone on the planet also knows how to get blueprints and research data, so it's really just another black market to a much greater extent than people think.

8 posted on 04/13/2016 11:58:39 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

9 posted on 04/14/2016 12:05:12 AM PDT by Bobalu (I'm spitting on my hands, and hoisting the black flag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
Hey !! Nice, I can't say it's pretty but it worked.

There are a lot of forgotten planes it seems. I remember seeing the Blue Angels fly Navy F11s and no one seems to remember that plane although it was a good looking plane and I guess in fleet service if the Angels flew it.

They went through a lot of different planes fast, or so it seems, back when I was a kid now it takes a decade to see much change other than refinements like the Super Hornet as opposed to the Hornet.

Thanks for the snapshot ! Saves me som digging around.

10 posted on 04/14/2016 12:10:03 AM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

11 posted on 04/14/2016 12:24:39 AM PDT by Bobalu (I'm spitting on my hands, and hoisting the black flag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
LOL, thanks again. That's it, just not Navy Blue. I liked those, probably because when you're eight years old and seeing the Blue Angels (back in the day when just being a jet was way cool) leaves a lasting impression.

Plus, the announcer must have said ten times, The Supersonic F11, and hey, supersonic was beyond cool to all the kids.

12 posted on 04/14/2016 12:34:33 AM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin; spel_grammer_an_punct_polise
Pretty much going on for a century

At the end of 1916, the German Albatros dominated the skies above Europe, until the Brits introduced a new Sowpwith design

which then went Ancient Mariner on th e Albatros

The German response?


13 posted on 04/14/2016 12:38:27 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy ("History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce." - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

Um ... the GeeBee was very unstable, IIRC.


14 posted on 04/14/2016 1:46:24 AM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

I was in Class 05-63 at Pensacola. At the time, the advanced students were flying F-11’s down in Texas.

In 1964 the Blues and the Thunderbirds appeared jointly at NAS Pensacola, flying F-11’s and F-105’s respectively.

Now I have to go research them both to see how faulty my memory is!


15 posted on 04/14/2016 1:56:20 AM PDT by Former War Criminal (Who am I? Why am I here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Looks like two yuge engines with wings. And a seat.


16 posted on 04/14/2016 2:21:53 AM PDT by McGruff (Rush Limbaugh: Jeb Bush could mount a convention comeback)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

External - so much for stealth.


17 posted on 04/14/2016 3:23:25 AM PDT by zipper (In their heart of hearts, all Democrats are communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spel_grammer_an_punct_polise

As you indicate - complete design straight from our F-22 blueprints and specs - freely donated to both the Russians and Chinese by our Marxist government......all dimensions exact to the nearest .001 inch. ......or .01 mm......


18 posted on 04/14/2016 4:40:22 AM PDT by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spel_grammer_an_punct_polise

If so, we’re screwed. The F-35 is a POS. The AF should have stayed with the F-22.


19 posted on 04/14/2016 5:01:04 AM PDT by Azeem (There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury and ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
The Blue Angels flew Phantom F4s from 1969 to 1974. They put on a fantastic display every year at Moffett Field in Mountain View California when the area was mostly orchards.

The F4 was a very impressive aircraft.

20 posted on 04/14/2016 5:23:14 AM PDT by caltaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson