Skip to comments.
Trump Campaign Accidentally Lists Cruz Delegate Number on Colorado Slate
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-campaign-accidentally-lists-cruz-delegate-number-recommended/st
Posted on 04/09/2016 5:17:42 PM PDT by Durbin
Edited on 04/09/2016 5:41:35 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 last
To: dynoman
You having a hard time keeping up?
dynoman, Poster Boy for Trump Campaign.
81
posted on
04/10/2016 8:14:01 AM PDT
by
X-spurt
(William of Ockham endorses Ted Cruz. 'the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected')
To: X-spurt
82
posted on
04/10/2016 8:18:02 AM PDT
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: X-spurt
83
posted on
04/10/2016 8:20:49 AM PDT
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: FreeReign
84
posted on
04/10/2016 9:44:42 AM PDT
by
Neu Pragmatist
(We are watching an election be stolen in real time -Defeat Cruz/GOPe - Vote Trump)
To: dynoman
85
posted on
04/10/2016 10:10:03 AM PDT
by
X-spurt
(William of Ockham endorses Ted Cruz. 'the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected')
To: dynoman
Cat got ur tongue? Hell, I’ve got a 5 year old Grandson that can paste pics.
Dialog not helping your lost cause?
86
posted on
04/10/2016 10:12:50 AM PDT
by
X-spurt
(William of Ockham endorses Ted Cruz. 'the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected')
To: X-spurt
Not about me. I know why you want to make it personal and use ad honinems.
87
posted on
04/10/2016 10:21:22 AM PDT
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: dynoman
This a FORUM for discussion dude, not facebook. Promote your candidate with honest dialog, kids post pics.
88
posted on
04/10/2016 10:26:32 AM PDT
by
X-spurt
(William of Ockham endorses Ted Cruz. 'the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected')
To: X-spurt
They why are you making it personal? Is that how you “promote your candidate”?? Use ad hominems??
89
posted on
04/10/2016 10:37:19 AM PDT
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: dynoman
After your “hide behind Daddy” #57 post, it told me all I needed to know. There will be substantive discuss with you, you have nothing except links and pastey pics.
90
posted on
04/10/2016 11:53:08 AM PDT
by
X-spurt
(William of Ockham endorses Ted Cruz. 'the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected')
To: Neu Pragmatist
"If Cruz should adopt the positions of Jeb Bush, then I wouldn't support him."
These above were my words in post 51. Notice that I used the contraction "wouldn't".
To: FreeReign
You’ve edited your post and changed it.. the post originally said you “would” ...now magically it says you “wouldn’t” ...if it was a typo, that’s fine I would understand - but you are trying to pretend that it has always said “wouldn’t” ... it’s very dishonest of you to do that ...
92
posted on
04/10/2016 12:23:13 PM PDT
by
Neu Pragmatist
(We are watching an election be stolen in real time -Defeat Cruz/GOPe - Vote Trump)
To: Durbin
Obviously Bush's Cruz's fault.
93
posted on
04/10/2016 12:33:53 PM PDT
by
Hoodat
(Article 4, Section 4)
To: X-spurt
When you make it personal with ad hominems that’s all you deserve.
94
posted on
04/10/2016 12:47:12 PM PDT
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: Neu Pragmatist
"If Cruz should adopt the positions of Jeb Bush, then I wouldn't support him." You’ve edited your post and changed it.. the post originally said you “would” ...now magically it says you “wouldn’t” ...if it was a typo, that’s fine I would understand - but you are trying to pretend that it has always said “wouldn’t” ... it’s very dishonest of you to do that ...
The above is a cut and paste from post #51.
One can't edit a post on FR.
Do you understand that. I'll repeat it again. One can't edit a post on FR.
All one has to do is go back and read post 51 to see that you are lying.
I suspect that there's something really wrong with you.
To: dynoman
Looks like that’s all you’ve got.
It seems that before all the old Paulbots resurrected from 2012 as Trumpbots, it was possible to actually hold a worthwhile conversation, albeit strong and conducted with honesty and civility. Where were you in 2012?
As to ad hominem that must be a mirror you are gazing on.
96
posted on
04/10/2016 2:34:54 PM PDT
by
X-spurt
(William of Ockham endorses Ted Cruz. 'the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected')
To: X-spurt
97
posted on
04/10/2016 2:37:16 PM PDT
by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
