Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will: Ted Cruz is surging by design
The Richmond Times-Dispatch ^ | April 6, 2016 | George Will

Posted on 04/06/2016 7:59:04 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-130 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
There are atheists here, too. Should they all be banned?

Welcome to Free Republic! Pro-God,
pro-family,
pro-America!
Est. 1996

http://www.freerepublic.com/home.htm

You tell us.
61 posted on 04/06/2016 8:48:41 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jim Rob: "Cruz has a tiny sliver of a chance. He should step aside." - 4-1-2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: georgiarat
"That will mean Cruz lost seven primaries after Wisconsin. "

UH, I think you are forgetting the 55 delegates of Colorado and Wyoming Stage 3. These are not winner-take-all, but all will be taken nonetheless ---by Cruz. Colorado this week, Wyoming next. Cruz already took 6 in Colorado, will get 3 more tomorrow, 12 more Friday and 16 more on Saturday. Trump: 0,0,0 and 0 again. so before NY, you will have 4 Cruz wins in a row, North Dakota, WS, CO and WY.

62 posted on 04/06/2016 8:50:00 PM PDT by cookcounty (Why are Trump's poll numbers against a wounded Hillary so AWFUL? Hello? No answer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Well, over the years I’ve seen more than one FReeper admit to being atheist or agnostic. You haven’t?


63 posted on 04/06/2016 8:51:02 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: heights
"Trump will have 500-600 more delegates than Cruz"

No he won't, oh my gosh. You are dreaming. But we will see.

64 posted on 04/06/2016 8:52:08 PM PDT by cookcounty (Why are Trump's poll numbers against a wounded Hillary so AWFUL? Hello? No answer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Typical Cruz supporter. You lost the argument so resort to pathetic childish insults.

Your establishment candidate should know that his party leader said the number could be changed at will. The GOPe will stop at nothing to get the candidate they can control.


65 posted on 04/06/2016 8:52:51 PM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Well, over the years I’ve seen more than one FReeper admit to being atheist or agnostic. You haven’t?

Can't say that I have. But I have seen FReepers occasionally post articles from know-nothing atheistic liberals that masquerade as conservatives.

Oh wait, that was you tonight.
66 posted on 04/06/2016 8:54:59 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jim Rob: "Cruz has a tiny sliver of a chance. He should step aside." - 4-1-2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Trump has never, never been able to beat Cruz in a 2 man race. Trump was able to get a lead only when the field was crowded.


67 posted on 04/06/2016 8:56:06 PM PDT by kik5150 (Cruz argued 9 times before Supreme Court judges. Trump argues with beauty pageant judges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny; All
I know, the media is making this huge deal out of a 30 pt net gain for Cruz. They talk about how Cruz trounced Trump but it was 12 points. Trump beat Cruz by 30 points in Florida.

The numbers tell a far grimmer story for King Cruz in Wisconsin.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Exit polls established that more voters would support Trump in the general election than they would Cruz.

When half the state hates you, that translates into Wisconsin in the 'RAT column come the Fall.
68 posted on 04/06/2016 8:57:33 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jim Rob: "Cruz has a tiny sliver of a chance. He should step aside." - 4-1-2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

He also beat Cruz by 23 points in AZ!!!!


69 posted on 04/06/2016 8:58:31 PM PDT by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

Sorry CottonBall, Reince Priebus said the rules committee could change the rule about potential nominees had to have the majority of delegates in EIGHT states to be considered for nomination.

Nobody, with the exception of some deranged Trumpsters, wants to change the requirement for the nominee to be elected with a simple majority.


70 posted on 04/06/2016 9:01:10 PM PDT by House Atreides (TRUMP or CRUZ --- The 1st one to get to 1237 gets the Nomination Brass Ring...PERIOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
"“1237 is an arbitrary number."

Donald is probably not confused about the definition of "majority," but he 's hoping his supporters are.

IN 160 years, it's always been a majority, but now, for the first time in history, we have a "front-runner" who is so weak, so feeble, that he wants to change the rules to subvert the wishes of the majority. Amazing.

71 posted on 04/06/2016 9:03:31 PM PDT by cookcounty (Why are Trump's poll numbers against a wounded Hillary so AWFUL? Hello? No answer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

George Will is to Smithers as Ted Cruz is to Mr. Burns.


72 posted on 04/06/2016 9:06:58 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
"Reince Priebus said the rules committee could change the rule about potential nominees had to have the majority of delegates in EIGHT states to be considered for nomination."

Rules changes have to be accepted and ratified by a majority of the whole convention. The Committee can pass a rule change, force a vote, but they can't dictate the result.

73 posted on 04/06/2016 9:09:15 PM PDT by cookcounty (Why are Trump's poll numbers against a wounded Hillary so AWFUL? Hello? No answer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty

It’s worth noting that the alternative to a majority has never been a plurality. Dems until the 1930s had a two-thirds rule.


74 posted on 04/06/2016 9:12:40 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty

Excuse me but what planet are you on that Cruz-has had the majority of voters!!! You folks are smoking some really good stuff maybe that is why Cruz is so popular in CO. !!!!!


75 posted on 04/06/2016 9:15:20 PM PDT by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat
He also beat Cruz by 23 points in AZ!!!!

Cruz has climbed into bed with the likes of Jeb Bush, Mitt Romney, Carly Fiorina, Lindsey Graham and the rest of the GOPe establishment elitists, and whether he did it with his eyes wide open, or while entertaining the delusional notion that they'll all say they "respect him in the morning", all Cruz has proven is that he was never an 'outsider', he was just as much an INSIDER as any one of those corrupt Washington pukes.
76 posted on 04/06/2016 9:15:58 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jim Rob: "Cruz has a tiny sliver of a chance. He should step aside." - 4-1-2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

May I be the first: FUGW


77 posted on 04/06/2016 9:19:11 PM PDT by map
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s official. Will and the rest of the GOPee really REALLY want to loose, so they can sit behind the lines and throw poo for the rest of their careers.

Poo slinging monkeys - no more, no less.


78 posted on 04/06/2016 9:22:32 PM PDT by Eisenhower Republican (Supervillains for Trump: "Because evil pays better!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty

Yes, I know. Hopefully, they’ll KEEP the 8 state rule and (to help prevent shenanigans) expand it to ALL ROUNDS OF VOTING.


79 posted on 04/06/2016 9:22:59 PM PDT by House Atreides (TRUMP or CRUZ --- The 1st one to get to 1237 gets the Nomination Brass Ring...PERIOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall
"1237 is an arbitrary number."

No, it's the number that makes a majority vote.

"It should be the one with the most votes."

Absolutely not. Without a majority the one with the most votes is just the one with the largest minority. Minority does not rule, for good reason.

An election is supposed to be about ideas and policies, not just personalities. In a multi-candidate election you can have multiple candidates with similar politics, and they are going to split their voters between them.

If it were just the largest number then someone representing ideas accepted by a minority of the party could win the nomination. As it is, the delegates can agree to settle on a candidate who represents the views of the party and combine their vote, and not hand it to a minority.

That's why in this scenario, a political party's nomination, it's not only acceptable to run it this way, it's necessary.

80 posted on 04/06/2016 9:23:23 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson