MEDIA LIES: The Real Wisconsin Poll Numbers

Stumpin for Trump ^ | 4/4/2016

[BlackFemaleArmyColonel]

After looking at the polls being reported in main stream media, it is clear they are not only manipulating the poll numbers they are also lying to the American public about the actual support of Donald Trump. The site www.isidewith.com has an interactive online poll which reports per Congressional District for all of the country’s states.

It is staggering the difference between reports on television news which has polls reflecting approximately 500-2500 people and this site with over 54,000 people who have participated online so far.

I suspect given the above, Donald Trump’s support is much greater than reported by the main stream media.

In addition, a new poll was released today by the American Research Group. Wisconsin primary results…

Likely Republican Primary Voters Apr 1-3 Cruz 32% Kasich 23% Trump 42% Other * Undecided 3%

And HuffPoo tracks 24 polls from 12 pollsters in Wisconsin and they also show Donald Trump with the lead.

[Cboldt]

-- He can run all he wants, but by law can't hold the office ... --

True as a function of the constitution, but there are also state laws that are designed to preclude ineligible people's names from being placed on the ballot. Those laws are generally the basis for the lawsuits that seek to have a candidate's name removed from the state ballot.

[verga]

Serious question: God forbid Devious Donald does get elected, which party will he be in on inauguration day?

[Cboldt]

-- But next week you Cruz boys will be finished. --

Week after that. The only things going on next week are Wyoming and Colorado. The NY primary is on the 19th, and a week later are a handful of North Eastern states.

[bert]

The Republican of course

[jpsb]

You should try to get on this list. You'd fit it fine. You uniparty folks are a real class act.

[verga]

Why, it seems you post all their talking points anyway, How long have you been sponsoring them?

[caveat emptor]

Stossel hates Trump with a burning passion

These betting sites are not based on emotion - other than the desire to make money. I don't fully understand how it works, but here's a succinct description from my original source article:

Stossel and Lott’s site relies on Betfair, a United Kingdom bookie that does brisk trade in folks who have a canny reading of statistics and then place real money on their analysis.

Make of that what you will.

[jpsb]

Why, it seems you post all their talking points anyway, How long have you been sponsoring them?

Warning Warning incoming DEVELOPING: We Have the DC Madam’s Phone Records

UPDATE: Tuesday April 5, 2016

We have the DC Madam’s phone records.
Pages and pages of phone records.
We are deciding how to present this evidence.
Please pass this on to Ted Cruz and his supporters.

[Larry Lucido]

If you want a hooker that bad, you should try hookers.com.

[jpsb]

Or I could just ask Ted for a referral.

[verga]

Or I could just ask Ted for a referral.

How stupid are the tRumpbots going to feel when this turns out to be nothing?

[dragnet2]

We all know this is a conspiracy concocted by: 1: The Establishment Republicans 2: FoxNews 3: Ted Cruz 4: MSNBC

Then you agree with me, those you mentioned above can't be trusted. Right?

[kara37]

How stupid are the tRumpbots going to feel when this turns out to be nothing?
*******************************************

They are not going to feel stupid. They will blame the bias media and the establishment for not reporting their Internet rumors.

[Strac6]

No

[Strac6]

No, and you missed the entire point of my reply.

This was simply a reply to the original poster who loves to post wild, unsubstantiated conspiracy theories and others who post wild, non-scientific polls with the blatantly obvious purpose of generating support for their candidate.

I like Trump, but his supporters do not need to be deceptive to generate support for him.

[dragnet2]

We all know this is a conspiracy concocted by: 1: The Establishment Republicans 2: FoxNews 3: Ted Cruz 4: MSNBC

Then you agree with me, those you mentioned above can't be trusted. Right?

No? To be clear, you're suggesting they can be trusted? Maybe you could clarify your response a bit. Thanks.

[Strac6]

I clarify for those who do not understand

I do not waste time clarifying for those who cannot understand... or worse, choose not to understand.

[dragnet2]

You’re free to evade the question. Not a problem.

See the tagline.

[joesbucks]

Something was terribly wrong with this poll.

[BlackFemaleArmyColonel]

Something was terribly wrong with the vote fraud.