Posted on 04/03/2016 7:35:14 AM PDT by Nachum
just wondering.
I am sure we will have a retraction. Hillary admitting that it is an unborn person is a major gaffe for her. A person connotes something other than a mass of tissue and should be treated separately from the mother. The Reps should jump on this one,
If only her mother had felt the same way.
Our state is inundated these days with her ads, as our Primary is this coming Tuesday.
Her ads are superbly crafted and very engaging...
...and then, she speaks....
Milk curdles. Babies scream. Our elderly stroke out. Animals run for shelter. Birds fall from the sky.
She’s so absolutely, ghoulishly AWFUL. Who on Earth could EVER vote for this Fabian Socialist Harridan? Aarrgghhh!
I pray for her redemption, but I would love to be there when she’s judge. My own scares the h@ll out of me.
Don’t point it out, just insist that she and everyone else keeps using the correct term acknowledging that theses people they are murdering are in fact people whom 5 Federal employees in black robes robed of their right to life in the name of anther ‘right’ no where mention in the Constitution nor ever before protected by the laws of the State or Congress.
The 9th amendment was violated by the one part of the Government it most applied to. And that is not the first or the last time that same corrupt body of dishonorable men and women violated their oaths and the law by striping us of our rights in the interest of their policy making agenda.
Well, Dred my Scott and let’s kill babies.
“But illegal aliens and Muslim terrorists have constitutional right according to her.”
Honestly the Federal Constitution applies to the Federal government not the people or their states. There is no such thing as a ‘constitutional’ right except that expressly given to the Federal government in terms of the ability to make law.
When the Federal employees in black robes decide to make their own law. They started inventing a select handful of polices they wanted to push and created individual ‘rights’ which they would elevate above all others as a means to create,abolish, or alter existing law in cadences to whatever their agenda is as they apply it to any given case.
Primarily thou when it comes to their ability to prosecuted Government and State officials do they find their real power, to superseded not only the Constitution’s restrictions upon their power but to directly govern the people by hijacking their other elected agents.
There uses to be a concept called solvergin immunity and the 11th amendment that prevented this hijacking of the legislative and executive branch by the federal employees in black robes. Those restrictions have over the 20th century been cast away. Primarily in the now fascist but formerly simply fanatical crusade against the never ending boggy man of racism.
Until the people unite against the Federal employees in black robes and strip them of their legislative and executive power over the Constitution and all other parts of the Government there can be no justice or freedom in this country.
The lawyers will run everything, as policy makers using judges as enforcers. Just like they been doing with increasing degrees of success over the last 50 years.
Is the Wicked Witch a descendent of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney?
Pre 1970s the unborn had the same constitutional protection as those outside the womb.
as bad as the Donald. Donald Trump’s 3 positions on abortion in 3 hours
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/30/politics/donald-trump-abortion-positions/index.html?sr=twnwsrm033116donald-trump-abortion-positions0159PMVODtopPhoto&linkId=22912617
Why Trump is not Pro Life
http://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2016/04/03/why-trump-is-not-prolife-n2142750?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=
Not this time. Abortion is “a sad, even tragic choice to many, many women,” said Clinton. Then she went further: “There is no reason why government cannot do more to educate and inform and provide assistance so that the choice guaranteed under our constitution either does not ever have to be exercised or only in very rare circumstances.”
“Does not ever have to be exercised”. I searched Google and Nexis for parts of that sentence tonight and got no hits. Is the press corps asleep? Hillary Clinton just endorsed a goal I've never heard a pro-choice leader endorse. Not safe, legal, and rare. Safe, legal, and never.
Safe, Legal, and Never: Hillary Clinton's anti-abortion strategy.”
www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_nature/2005/01/safe_legal_and_never.single.html
Illegal aliens have constitutional rights, but unborn children don’t, according to Madame Hillary. Doesn’t she remind you of Mme. LeFarge (knitting a special stitch every time a head (IOW a US freedom) rolls off the guillotine?
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
It’s a shame her mother didn’t have the same opinion, but I digress.
Wouldn’t it be great to see a dem candidate get asked during a debate, “if a late term aborted baby survives the abortion, what do you think the actions of the doctor should be?”
I have always wondered about that dichotomy myself.
OF COURSE women who murder their unborn children should be punished; we punish men who don’t pay child support, don’t we?
Absolutely correct.
Abortion is not removing cancer or a tumor.
What is it removing?
It’s removing the viability of a child.
She calls the unborn child a person rather than a fetus like most abortion supporters do. Yet this unborn person has no rights. Can she even hear herself? Why are there laws that charge a murderer with two murders if a pregnant woman is killed? She is the face of evil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.