Posted on 03/29/2016 10:34:44 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
30,274 voters responded to our online poll asking if the the ongoing Ted Cruz sex scandal is true or not.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativeoutfitters.com ...
In one sense I don’t care because Ted is neither elligible nor properly experienced.
But in another sense, I’d very much like it resolved one way or another. If Ted is guilty, then let the chips fall and let him get out of Trump’s way.
But if Ted is not guilty, then let that come out and his family get some relief. And then let voters examine who is really qualified and who can lead and vote Trump.
Given his underhanded tactics he’s been engaging in as of late, I’m inclined to believe the allegations. 2 months ago, I wouldn’t.
The lying is just comical... there is no doubt his wife was fully in the know, perhaps not about every one of them, but come on you have Amanda repeatedly referring to him as “Daddy” publicly.... you are going to try to pretend his wife couldn’t have known about it? Please... they are a political power couple, she knew and they probably had an agreement...
So its pretty clear he’s not lying to save his marriage or hurting his wife, he’s lying to keep from admitting the truth to the public, which is just stupid. How many times in politics does it have to be shown that its not the crime that does the person in but the cover up.
Cruz just finds a way to look slimier with every passing day, since the day he blamed Trump for the paid agitators in Chicago he’s just been on a downward slope.
A man that will cheat on his wife and child while claiming to be a Christian and man of integrity CAN NOT BE TRUSTED !
I believe the majority of the people on this website and others are working for the Cruz campaign or one of it’s superpacs.
SOMEBODY is going to slap a hastag in front of that new word, and start using it. i.e. #TedScruZ. I, personally, am not on Twitter, and don’t even know how to do create such hashtaggings.
I thought snopes determined that to be false.
Then your brain has some damage..
You have a young staffer who repeatedly referred to him as “Daddy” in public.. you think for one minute that they were “just friends”? Or that his wife wasn’t in the know?
Please. I am going to go out a limb and guess you think when an older man buys a younger woman who he is not related to a Blue Dress, it’s because they are “just friends” as well.
Sorry, but live in your room of denial, while the rest of us live in the real world.
OK, who put that keyword ‘scruz’ up there?
As a Cruz supporter - I got tell ya...
That’s funny as hell. I lulzd.
BOL! Not a Cruz supporter at this time, but Scruz is funny.
Some of the keywords for some posts are outstanding and really funny like Trumpinator!
Not only do I not care, but I'm bothered by the likelihood that this is going to do nothing other than hurt or embarrass his wife and kids.
Let's say the guy strayed 8 years ago, came clean to his wife, they went to counseling, and got past it. Now, in the interests of...I don't know what, we have people gleefully hopping on this and demanding he be asked those questions. Just so their guy wins.
Polls tend to be lagging indicators.
I think Wisconsin was going to be close regardless, guess we’ll know in a week.
“I don’t care if he did or not.”
It is refreshing to see a cruzbot who does not hide behind the “principled conservative” façade...
Good grief...whatever.
Interesting reading and that somehow escaped getting a lot of publicity.
“
Why not ask if Trump had affairs?
Oh wait. He did. Lot of ‘em. Per his own admission.”
Yes, in other words he has not gone about for over a year claiming to be a principled conservative Christian like Cruz has...Cruz has intentionally mislead his supporters. When he lies, he isn’t lying to Trump supporters...we don’t believe him and he knows it. He is lying to you, his supporters. He has had no respect for you as a person.
Cant help but wonder what the % would be if this poll was taken before today's Fiorini/Cruz non-denial denial.
The problem with having stuff hidden, is that it makes one vulnerable to blackmail. I think MOST politicians in DC are "compromised" on one thing or another.
I don't think the Establishment likes having someone around who they cannot destroy if he "gets out of line". That's one big reason why I think Trump frightens the Establishment. Yes, he's had sex with a number of women, but he's not blackmailable over it, because he's come clean about his affairs.
That said, without solid evidence, current reports are shameful and defenseless gossip along the lines of "when did you stop beating your wife" type of accusations.
Focus on the goal. Cruz and Trump are the only viable candidates running at the moment. The establishment is hell bent on undermining the current front runner. The establishment has no hold over Trump. Early on, the establishment made clear that Cruz was hated, not a team player. Now, Cruz is being used by the establishment. They will drop him like yesterdays trash should they manage to succeed.
Stop falling for all the garbage pushed by the establishment to undermine this election cycle. Both Cruz and Trump exhibit unique strengths to take advantage of & immediately should bury their political hatchets and join forces to undermine the GOPe/RNC when/while they have the delegate numbers to do so. It is well past time for 'the people' to deliver to the GOPe/RNC their well deserved demise.
Yes, but we need to know if he has had more affairs.
Trump should be asked for an update.
In fact, all the candidates should be asked. We had 17 Republican candidates for the nomination. All of them should have been asked up front at the first debate.
And we should extend this even further. All employers should be asking this of the people they hire.
This all should be the new standard. All because we wish to rationalize asking that question to Ted Cruz.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.