Posted on 03/28/2016 6:34:00 PM PDT by simka
Well, as our Founders designed it, the involvement of the people with their use of the ballot box was considered to best way to keep elected officials in line.
You are mistaken. First, the SCOTUS has already shot down an attempt by a state (Colorado?) to impose term limits on its federal representatives -- because the Constitution imposes no such limits.
Secondly, the Constitution does not provide for recall of federal representatives, thus they can only be removed by resignation, death or the ballot box.
It would be the longest of long shots. Each member of Congress has one vote, so it's hard to say they don't have equal representation. And as to Committee memberships and the like, I can't see the courts getting involved, because the Constitution explicitly says (Article I, section 5) that each house gets to make its own rules.
What problem would you be solving with term limits?
It surely will not solve the problem of the lobbyists. The politicians will be easier to buy - they don’t have to worry about reelection. And for the same reason the voters will have even less influence over them than they do now.
If I recall correctly there was a state which placed term limits on their congressmen and senators. But the courts ruled that state law unconstitutional, so that it would take a federal law to out term limits in at the federal level.
Maine in the 1990s.
Since this custom is no longer in force we have to apply law.
The founders understood that or they would never have left the possibility of adding amendments to the Constitution open and accessible.
Article V convention. And to all those that say it just cements power, bunk. Elections won’t do it either 85 to 90% of incumbents are re-elected. Historically it’s been shown that doesn’t work. At least term limits give us a shot. I can’t imagine the presidency anymore with out term limits. Term limits for all elected federal officials.
The real problem is with bureaucrats who have no term limits.
There is a way of dealing with that too. You just remove the dumb idea that any regulation has the power of law and return to concept that only the power of law has the power of law.
The problem is not the 535 idiots who get elected. The bad actors are the 20,000 staffers and experts who serve the 535 idiots who make ALL the written policy. Those lifers shuttle from one office to another as elected officials are replaced or retire. Those staffers are the ones who have the ear of the representatives and who actually write out the policy and the laws. After that, of course, once the law is implemented, similar staffers who populate the regulating agencies set about to write regulations nobody ever intended to be produced by the law as passed.
VOTE THE BASTARDS OUT!
If a congressman’s legislation never goes up for a vote, or only after being bastardized by the party whores running the committees, then I don’t think his constituents are receiving equal representation.
"a Convention for Proposing Amendments". Proposing amendments to what exactly? If it's not a constitutional convention, what are you proposing amendments to at said convention?I read it.
You're the pretend constitutional scholar answer the question.
If it's not a constitutional convention, what exactly are you clowns going to propose to amend at this "convention (AKA wet dream) for proposing amendments"?
N.B. Note that inevitable does not mean imminent.
We have term limits already, every two years, we keep the bad ones and throw out the good ones!!!!!!!
There is something to be said for experience in any job.
Congress writes the laws, so they will not do it themselves. The only other way is a Constitutional Amendment. And the only way to bypass Congress on those is a Constitutional Convention. And that can be very dangerous. Because if the wrong people get control of the process you can lose many Amendments we hold sacred like the 2nd.
But that involves paying attention and thinking for oneself. No longer part of our curriculum.
For Lakewood, here are a few things the Uniparty has done to our once republic.
It calls the murder of innocents a right.
It robs Peter to buy off Paul.
It determined two homos can marry.
It created Common Core Idiocy.
It shuts down electricity generating power plants.
It determined you must buy government approved health insurance.
In the name of social justice the Uniparty will spread Section 8 voucher people among middle-class neighborhoods.
It opened our borders to Mexicans and muzzies.
All of the above top-down diktats from the Uniparty have been approved by Scotus.
Nothing like them have ever been proposed as constitutional amendments by the people/states.
You, I and others realize that elections alone cannot cure our national ills.
So who are the actual clowns? Are they those who grasp at the very Article of the Constitution designed for our situation? I say the clowns are those who expect different results from doing the same thing over and over.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.