Posted on 02/28/2016 1:58:10 AM PST by vikingrinn
FEBRUARY 3, 2016.
Look at the date and YEAR of the meetings!
2013.
Being condescending is not really much nicer than name calling. It is willful blindness to deny Sundance is not motivated by promoting Trump.
This is a conspiracy theory because the accused have dared to not bow at the feet of the mighty Trump.
It is also divisive and a disservice to the big picture of advancing conservative principles. It smears key, important communicators of the conservative message and elevates a doofus named “Sundance.”
I already corrected myself on the date. Someone else posted a Limbaugh quote from 2013.
Disparaging someone of accomplishment won't narrow the gap between that person and yourself. But to do so without any qualification proves that rabid civet cats like your kind get their kicks simply from from lashing out. Thankfully Rush is big enough to ignore you anonymous keyboard cowards.
That’s your opinion.
Seems “sundance” has been right about a few things, so he is worth a listen to.
As with any other source, you must weigh what is said and see if it comes to pass.
To dismiss things out of hand due to ideological blinders is not the way to go, either.
I am not smearing him. I am saying I do not trust him. I have experience with being backstabbed on this issue. I know what to look for. I admitted it could not be proved. Did I not. I add to the red flags the fact that he has done a lot of parsing and dissembling on the immigration issue. I do not trust him.
Nearly every politician who has recently come out in favor of gay marriage started out being against it. You have to look at who advises them and what phrases they choose to use. I give a pass on the donations part. I do not give a pass on key advisors, on seeming to say two contrary things at the same time, or on phrase choices in general. They reveal a lot.
Same with Cruz’s eligibility. Some subjects are “off the table,” because they are too upsetting to the established order.
How many things have Rush, Hannity, Ingraham and Levin been right about? And for how long?
You can worship Mr. Accomplishment—I don’t need to do so.
I have been to more rallies and protests than Rush ever has.
Nevertheless, he has some explaining to do to those who are his listeners.
And I was one since late 1988.
Rush doesn’t worry about anyone past the Golden EIB microphone. He is an entertainer.
You just enjoy your time on the plantation.
This seals the deal for me - Rubio is a POS as if it weren’t already obvious, and just as obvious the little ****** and whores on FOX who are part of the Chamber of Commerce crowd of pro-amnesty Trump haters from that whore for Rubio (or whoever is next in line, be it Romney, bring it on) Megyn the Whore of Babble Kelly or those little ****** on the now totally lame Red Eye show that is about as funny as Rubio’s pee pee jokes, and others.
Rush Limbaugh absolutely did play for Rubio on the Gang of Eight, it was probably the biggest mistake of his gig ever, no doubt he probably knows it now and his trying to spin his way out of this - and just wait for the b.s. this Monday - isn’t going to help. He will probably blame Rubio or come up with some cockamamie conspiracy story but he did it to himself, so until he comes out with an apology and endorses Trump than he’s on my doghouse list as “he ain’t my daddy”.
I don’t think there is much here to do with Hannity, but serious doo doo for the entire Rush Limbaugh gig.
As for FOX and the prostitutes, both male and female, of the “boss” and the NR Rich Lowry and that fascist of nuestra familia Megyn Kelly and “Red Eye” and the rest of the new Gang of Eight that hates the Republican base, they are all permanent POS on my book forever. O’Reilly still has some credibility, Hannity I don’t think went down that path despite pressure, but pretty much the rest did - the first thing FOX needs to do for redemption because I can guarantee there IS going to be a new news channel using newer technology that will eclipse them, is to rid themselves of Kelly, that is step one. Drop Red Eye, two.
The Levinites and the Beckers were already off my book. Nothing will get me to listen to them or their crowd after this elrction even if they drank their own urine as penance.
My ear has been a bit more discriminating with Rush recently. I think we have lost him. He knows his audience well. Someone is getting to him. To get to someone with his wealth, well.... do the math.
I have listened to all of them for a very long time.
If they changed their message due to influences from politicians or their media bosses, that is big news, especially about amnesty, that affects all of us in the real world, who don’t have the luxury of talking to make a living.
How about this for a radical change of direction?
STOP SMEARING REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES.
If you have a favourite, that's okay. If you have concerns about some other candidate, that's understandable too. But '(gasp!) Marco Rubio's adviser supports gay marriage'?
Try behaving here like you would in real life. Like a normal person, sans hate. You might find the new experience beneficial.
Well mark Mark Levin off your hit list. I rarely miss his show. He is most definitely NOT pro-amnesty. Not even slightly.
You do understand that cutting yourself off from every key conservative in the world will not help Trump or any other conservative get elected. Just the opposite. (Not that I think Trump is a conservative. I do not. Check out his amnesty positions back in 2013.)
Big Oil?
The military-industrial complex?
Mossad?
DON'T LEAVE US HANGING LIKE THIS
I am not smearing Rubio. He has flip flopped on amnesty and lied about it. He is lying about it still. I would be stupid to not question his other positions, given his track record on that issue. The fault there lies with Rubio. He smeared his constituents by robbing them of their right to choose a representative according to his actual positions. He chose instead to trick them.
Your remark about cutting myself off from every key conservative—where did that come from?
I have no allusions about Trump being a “conservative”—however he is far more “conservative” than the entire GOP-E and Cruz, Rubio and Kasich.
This is no delusional bedtime story! The supper at News Corporation headquarters Jan. 17, 2013, is not something to take lightly. The extent of the collusion to jam immigration reform down the throat of American public was a poison pill to the future of America as we knew it over the centuries. The poison of a back door amnesty to the understated 11 million illegal border crossers was going to be candy coated and packaged in a gilded pill box.
No! Do not take lightly this misguided supper! Breitbart has broke it here:
Thank God the Breitbart people have broke this game changing news. It has revealed one more episode in the continuing betrayal of the American Republic!
There is conspiracy. Those involved, by their secrecy were a part of the New World Order cabal that supported and endorsed an agenda that will continue to flood our nation with border crossers for the promise of cheap labor, new Democrat voters and election rewards. All was at the expense of the American people and their precious workers.
The lawlessness at our border that infuriates Americans has been exchanged for the pacification of the Hispanic electorate. A pacification that would continue our border be flooded by illegal border crossers and give a pass to those who violated America’s sovereignty.
This turning of the wheel was intended to end the wild fire over the illegal catastrophe just before a pivotal election cycle that would determine the balance of power in the Senate and on to the White House in 2016. It was a calculation that factored in the betrayal of the American people for the promise of a favorable election outcome. It was a Judas Kiss and 30 pieces of silver and, what I call the Last Supper for America!
You are smearing me with that comment. Try looking for that log in your own eye.
So do we have to throw Cruz under the bus too?
'GAY'-MARRIAGE SKELETONS POP OUT OF RUBIO, CRUZ CLOSETS Campaign staffers encouraged Supremes to impose in name of 'conservative values'
http://mobile.wnd.com/2016/02/rubios-deputy-campaign-manager-gay-marriage-activist/#YZCDRpy4UQcEsrqk.99
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.