Posted on 02/13/2016 5:00:48 AM PST by Kaslin
When is the last time you were in Denmark? Or Norway? Or Sweden?
If you have had the pleasure of visiting these lovely places you may have noticed something really odd. Nobody there talks the way Bernie Sanders talks.
Sanders frequently points to northern European countries, especially Denmark, as examples of how he would like to remake the United States economy - by which he mainly means higher taxes and more social services. But the main difference between the tax systems of the US and Denmark is not high taxes on the rich. It's higher taxes on the middle class. (See my previous post on this.)
By and large, people in Denmark do not demonize the rich. They don't think that successful people are the reason why average incomes aren't higher. Nor are they clamoring to confiscate the wealth of those at the top of the income ladder.
Take inheritance taxes. The US has higher estate taxes than virtually any country in Europe. According to the Tax Foundation, our top estate tax rate is 40%. In the Netherlands it's 20%. In Denmark it's 15%. In Norway and Sweden, there is no estate tax!
Here is Bernie Sanders on the campaign trail:
In the last 30 years in America there has been a massive redistribution of wealth. The problem is it's gone in the wrong direction. Trillions of dollars go from the pockets of working families, trillions of dollars, into the bank accounts of the top one tenth of one percent and brothers and sisters, you and I together are gonna change the flow of that revenue!
And although she is not nearly as bad, Sanders has managed to pull Hillary Clinton in the direction of this same world view. For example, she has repeatedly claimed that "the deck is stacked," with "the wealthy getting wealthier at the expense of hard-working families."
This is what I call barnyard Marxism. It's the view that all wealth is theft. It's the view that there is no essential difference between making money in the marketplace and robbing a bank. It's rhetoric designed to divide. Sanders in particular employs the same kind of attacks on the rich that anti-Semites use in attacking Jews, that white southern racists used to use in attacking blacks, that nativists use to attack immigrants and that demagogues all over the world use to find scapegoats for the problems of ordinary people.
As Bret Stephens wrote in the Wall Street Journal, "The Vermont socialist preaches class hatred to crowds besotted by the politics of envy."
The coded message is: if you lost your job, if you wages have been stagnant, if you have trouble making ends meet - it's not your fault; it's the fault of the scapegoat.
It is also pure bunk.
Bill Gates is estimated to be the world's richest man. J. K. Rowling is estimated to be the world's richest woman. Did either of these two ever take money out of your pockets?
Gates got rich by providing the software that I am using at this very moment as I create this editorial. It's well worth what I had to pay for it. Rowling got rich because people all over the world like to read Harry Potter novels and enjoy watching Harry Potter movies. How could anyone object to that?
If we look down the list of the 400 richest Americans, it is remarkable that 69% are self-made. They started with virtually nothing and became billionaires. How did they do it? Jeff Bezos founded Amazon. Sergey Brin created Google with Larry Page. Mark Zuckerberg created Facebook.Phil Knight created Nike. And so on.
Last time I looked, there is no gun pointing at any one's head forcing them to buy from Amazon. No one requires you to use Facebook or to wear Nike sneakers. And no one has to use the Google search engine. All of these people got rich by meeting our needs better than other people could meet our needs.
Almost all American billionaires are philanthropists. At last count, 141 of them have pledged to give half their wealth away. Warren Buffett is giving 95% away. Bill Gates is giving 99%. I'm sure it will be much better spent than if it were in the hands of bureaucrats in Washington, D.C.
Bernie Sanders hates the idea of competition and the profit motive. He would like to remove the private sector entirely from the health care system, for example. Social democrats in northern Europe have a different view. One reason Denmark is so successful economically, despite its high taxes, is that it freely endorses deregulation, privatization and letting markets do what only they can do well - allocate resources.
There are, however, places in the world where the Sanders' rhetoric accurately describes reality. These are places where the people at the top really have stolen everything they have from those at the bottom. They are places where the luxurious lifestyle of those at the top really is oppressing those below them.
Ironically the very worst examples are Marxist countries, where leaders came to power using the very same rhetoric Bernie Sanders uses.
Fidel Castro's former bodyguard Juan Reinaldo Sanchez says that the communist leader "lived like a king" and "ran country like a cross between medieval overlord and Louis XV." While ordinary Cubans stood in breadlines and suffered the effects of a declining economy, Castro had his own private yacht and his own private island -- a luxury Caribbean getaway, complete with dolphins and a turtle farm. In Havana, he lived in an immense estate with a rooftop bowling alley, a basketball court and fully equipped medical center.
While his fellow countrymen are starving to death, North Korean communist leader Kim Jong-un has managed to slip by international sanctions and import $2.09 billion in luxury goods from China between 2012 and 2014, according to The New York Times. The items include Mercedes-Benz S-Class cars and a luxury yacht worth as much as $6 million. More recently, he imported the materials needed to construct a world class ski resort. As far as I can tell, the only skier who will use it is Kim Jong-un himself.
According to Hong Kong-based historian, Frank Dikoetter, Chinese communist leader Mao Tse-tung was the greatest mass murderer in world history. "At least 45 million people were worked, starved or beaten to death," he writes. "It was like [the Cambodian communist dictator] Pol Pot's genocide multiplied 20 times over."
In a book written by Mao's own personal physician, Dr. Li Zhisui writes:
Despite his populist pretensions, Mao lived like a traditional emperor with all the material comforts that China could afford. His physical needs were taken care of by attendants recruited from young, uneducated peasants, who bathed and clothed him and combed his hair …. [He] indulged in young women--sometimes more than one at the same time -- and … even had a special bed made for his sexual activity…
The world's second greatest mass murderer, Josef Stalin killed 20 million, many by forced starvation. Stalin himself had no fear of starvation, however. Upon his death, he was worth an estimated $75 million.
On his death, Mao Tse-tung was worth an estimated $1 billion. Mao's granddaughter has been named to China's rich list, with a fortune of nearly £530 million.
During the reign of avowed Marxist, Hugo Chavez, Venezuela drowned in a sea of corruption involving "some of the most senior figures in Mr. Chavez's "Bolivarian revolution,'" according to The Economist. The country is ranked as the eighth most graft ridden country in the world. Even places like Haiti and Zimbabwe rank higher.
Although Chavez is now dead, according to Venezuelan media sources his daughter, Maria Gabriela Chavez, has bank accounts in the U.S. and Andorra with assets totaling nearly $4.2 billion - making her the richest individual in Venezuela.
And what about ordinary Venezuelans? In a New York Times report, Nicholas Casey writes:
In the capital, water is so expensive and scarce that residents wait for hours with bottles at the side of a mountain where it trickles out onto the highway.
In the countryside, sugar cane fields rot, and milk factories stand idle, even as people carry bags of money around to buy food on the black market in every city and town…
Inflation is expected to hit 720 percent this year, the highest in the world.
R.J. Rummel estimates that almost 170 million people were killed in the 20th century by their own governments. These are not deaths in war. They are the victims of genocide by the government in the country where they lived.
It is amazing how many of the people responsible for this carnage used the exact same language Bernie Sanders is now using in coming to power. They promised to redistribute wealth. And they did. A lot of it to themselves.
A POS SCUMBAG socialist and a POS SCUMBAG criminal running for the ‘Rats.
DEPOPULATE from the body politic.
live - free - republic
"Leave your clothes here. Glasses? FACE THE DOORS!"
[Chekist çõúøÑÂÑ‚ '1992' Russian film 'Eng-Subs' (full)]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RQVSHfuPCQ
Are we there soon?
With the history of socialism’s success, better stock up on toilet paper.
Excellent column which should be required reading for all millennial sons and daughters — who have no idea where this “cool” brand of populist rhetoric leads. Ideas have consequences, and the candidates’ moral and political philosophies matter.
Current POTUS is a POS SCUMBAG socialist, marxist, muslim. Problem we have is that 50+% of people in America are idiots.
Does it matter? If people need to be told we are through.
A “Democratic-Socialist” is what the East-Germans called themselves.
You know that and I know that about the half-frikken (half-marxist, half-mohammedan) POSOTUS, yet he was presented (by propagandists) as a unifying force - a blank slate. Feel the bern doesn’t have that “blank slate” unifying appeal as an old white POS socialist, and Hillaryous Rotten Criminal has a rap sheet as long as __ ____ (fill in blank slate). This makes for a fascinating election year.
Hoooooo... boy.
If this Bernie goes up against Donald Trump, who actually knows something about other world socialisms like this, he would not last half an hour.
Yeah. Feel the Bern. Berning up your wallet for an army of civil servants most of whom are there to soak up some baksheesh.
Now Hillary is hardly going to complain along these lines, because it would bring some of her pet ideas under unwanted scrutiny too.
Bernie is just plain Bat$h!t crazy....You have to be to be a democRAT
A lot of conservatives thought that exposing Obama (and now Sanders) as Bolsheviks would hurt them; it is high time we accepted the fact that much of their support is BECAUSE of that ideology. This is no longer a Christian culture, and capitalism has left a mess here due to outsourcing and importing of Third World labor; plenty of voters WANT communism - they simply see no alternative better for them. It probably has to fail (like ObamaCare and Red (capital R) states’ economies) before they see the light.
All Democrats are!
>>With the history of socialism’s success
It’s no wonder the 2nd amendment is so troubling to them.
Kind of hard to herd the sheeple into the basement when they can shoot back.
[The Chekist, 1992 Russian, English subtitles]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RQVSHfuPCQ
Wasn’t it they who also bragged that capitalism would sell them the rope with which they would hang it?
As a relative Johnny come lately to the Christian side of the Judeo-Christian party, I can now quite clearly see what has been taken advantage of. People WANT a generous world. They know somehow that this is their nature. But people have walked off from God in their prides (I’ve been no exception), and seek poor substitutes. It is like the way in which the prodigal son in the parable, longed to eat the pods which were the fodder of the swine he hired himself out to keep.
Again I was no exception. I went for Jimmy Carter, twice, whereas the verdict of the nation the second time around was “RONALD REAGAN AND WE’RE NOT KIDDING!” And I still didn’t stop... I went for Dukakis too! But that was before God grabbed me and showed me how much He cared. And I stopped expecting to see generosity initiatives out of politicians. I now knew it had to be private, from the heart.
I’ve been a little hard on Reagan still (actually been hard on regarding him as an idol), but for the most part he left room for the grace of the Lord rather than Carter’s man-centered pessimistic naysaying. I didn’t appreciate this until years and years later, in retrospect.
The problem is that way too many people have been conditioned to feel, not think. And socialist leaders are adept at manipulating emotions. When they tell their subjects that they want nothing but the best for everyone, their subjects believe it. Even when the truth that socialist leaders are all about redistributing the results of their subjects’ hard work to themselves—for instance, Obama’s frequent and lavish vacations—their subjects still support them, still get all warm and fuzzy about how much dear leader “cares.”
Critical thinking is a skill in short supply these days.
“Excellent column which should be required reading for all millennial sons and daughters — who have no idea where this “cool†brand of populist rhetoric leads. Ideas have consequences, and the candidates’ moral and political philosophies matter.”
They will only say “this time will be different because we know how to do socialism the right way, ie, democratic socialism where we all get to vote on who divides the wealth.”
>>Wasn’t it they who also bragged that capitalism would sell them the rope with which they would hang it?
Somewhere in Hell, Nicky Kruscheve is caressing his shoe and chortling — “See, told you so. Vee bury you!”
>>They know somehow that this is their nature.
Read Animal Farm - Orwell illustrated their nature quite accurately.
Good article.
I prefer ‘Hardline Communist’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.