Posted on 02/11/2016 3:06:40 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
Any would-be Republican presidential candidate who had--hanging around his neck--all the scandals and investigations that surround Hillary Clinton, would likely not have the chutzpah to throw his hat into the ring. He would know that the MSM would create such a toxic environment that his candidacy would never have a chance of getting off the ground.
And so it is somewhere between amusing and outrageous to hear Mark Halperin claim, as he did on today's With All Due Respect, that the press is "biased against" Hillary Clinton. Granted, Halperin did so in the context of discussing this evening's Dem debate between Hillary and Bernie Sanders. As between those two, might the MSM lean towards Sanders, as the further-left candidate? Could be. But if Hillary wins the nomination, does Halperin doubt that the press will be pulling for Clinton against the Republican? Some bias!
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Biased........wow. just wow. where is the press telling the millennials how she got more delegates than bernie?
Total nutcase.
If anyone gets a pass from these alleged “Journ-O-Lists” like the brown nosing Halperin, it’s the Clintons
Ok, second behind Obambie, but still the point remains
What’s Mark Halperin smoking?
Hillary’s a “victim”.
Does he seriously have a Wu-tang sticker on that tablet stand?
If by “biased against” you mean “hates her guts”, I suspect he’s right
They're still busy writing about how Fat Albert really won Florida in 2000...
i agree that there are probably a lot of foot soldiers in the press who are bernistas, but the editorial class and the money that pays for them are completely in the cankles camp.
Fun to watch how sure they are that they are experts and know what nobody else does.
Why didn’t they predict what happened if they are such insightful “insiders.”
Also, if you're a strikingly good campaigner, the media talk about it. If you're a particularly bad campaigner, they'll discuss that. Hillary definitely fits into one of those categories, and maybe you can guess which.
So,no, there are negative stories about Hillary that the media can't entirely suppress, but that doesn't mean the press is biased against Clinton, or that they'd favor Bernie -- let alone a Republican -- to Hillary.
Says the guy that spiked the Monica story until Drudge blew it wide open back in the good old days of the Clintonista’s. What a hack.
Oops, wrong Michael on Monica, it was Isikoff at Newsweek not Halperin. Halperin is still a hack that tries to act like a neutral arbiter of the media, who just happens to constantly apologize for Dems, especially the Clintons.
What is this red and blue thing you keep posting?
Place your cursor over the bar. It will tell you.
If you’re on an iPad or other device, that might now work.
It’s a like to the FR Caucus.
Halperin isn’t a Michael.
When your future and life depend on saying certain things, even if they are bald faced lies, you get out there and say them with a straight face.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.