Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump vows to push LGBT rights, hedges on pro-marriage litmus test
LifeSiteNews ^ | 2/8/16 | Lisa Bourne

Posted on 02/09/2016 8:53:30 AM PST by wagglebee

CONCORD, New Hampshire, February 8, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Does Donald Trump support the gay agenda or oppose it? On the eve of the New Hampshire primary, observers are still scratching their heads about where the GOP frontrunner actually stands.

Trump has repeatedly and consistently said he supports the natural definition of marriage, but can a President Trump be relied on to promote it resolutely and cogently? It is this question that has many marriage activists expressing concern about his increasingly likely hold on the GOP nomination.

In fact, the National Organization for Marriage has gone so far as to say that Trump has “abandoned” the pro-marriage cause.

Trump himself underscored the problem on the weekend when he told a New Hampshire television station that from the White House he would push “equality” for homosexuals even further forward.

A cable news reporter self-identifying as a lesbian asked him last Thursday after a rally in Exeter, "When President Trump is in office, can we look for more forward motion on equality for gays and lesbians?"

“Well, you can and look - again, we're going to bring people together. That's your thing, and other people have their thing,” Trump told Sue O’Connell of New England Cable News. “We have to bring all people together. And if we don't, we're not gonna have a country anymore. It's gonna be a total mess.”

Following the comments, Trump appeared Sunday on ABC’s This Week program with George Stephanopoulos and would not commit to appointing Supreme Court justices who’d overturn Obergefell, though that would be his “preference.”

“We’re going to look at judges. They’ve got to be great judges. They’ve got to be conservative judges. We’re going to see how they stand depending on what their views are. But that would be my preference,” he told Stephanopoulos. “I would prefer that they stand against, but we’ll see what happens. It depends on the judge.”

Trump’s comments follow his statements during a Fox News Sunday interview last week, when he said, “If I'm elected, I would be very strong on putting certain judges on the bench that I think maybe could change things, but they've got a long way to go.” 

“[Marriage] should be a states rights issue,” Trump continued. “I can see changes coming down the line, frankly.” 

When asked by Fox if he “might try to appoint justices to overrule the decision on same-sex marriage,” Trump replied, “I would strongly consider that, yes.”

The real estate mogul criticized the Supreme Court for the Obergefell decision imposing homosexual “marriage” on all 50 states last June, but then later in August, Trump voiced support to NBC News for banning companies from firing employees on the basis of sexual orientation. “I don't think it should be a reason” to fire workers, he said at the time on Meet the Press.

The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) and a number influential evangelicals have endorsed Senator Ted Cruz in the race for president. The Texas senator has not only committed to appointing pro-marriage justices, but says the president and the states can rightly defy the “fundamentally illegitimate” ruling just as President Lincoln defied the Dred Scott decision.

NOM has also been highly critical of Trump, saying he has “abandoned” their cause. The organization said in its January 27 blog post just prior to the Iowa Caucus that “Donald Trump does not support a constitutional amendment to restore marriage to our laws. Worse, he has publicly abandoned the fight for marriage. When the US Supreme Court issued their illegitimate ruling redefining marriage, Trump promptly threw in the towel with these comments on MSNBC: ‘You have to go with it. The decision's been made, and that is the law of the land.’”

NOM had said the week before that Trump “has made no commitments to fight for marriage, or the rights of supporters of marriage to not be discriminated against and punished for refusing to go along with the lie that is same-sex 'marriage.'”

New Hampshire voters have been tracked as showing support for homosexual “marriage,” as a poll last February showed 52 percent of Republican NH primary voters saying opposing gay “marriage” is unacceptable.

The latest CNN/WMUR tracking poll shows that overall 33 percent of likely Republican primary voters support Trump, giving him a growing 17-point lead over the nearest GOP contender. RealClearPolitics polling average in the state puts him at 31.0 percent support, with Marco Rubio second at 14.7, John Kasich third at 13.2, and Ted Cruz fourth at 12.7.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: 2016issues; bs; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes; samesexmarriage; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last
To: wagglebee

There is an active invasion occurring in this country and in Europe. Some people pay attention to that. They’ll vote for anyone who is aware of that and bonus if he thinks it is very very vad


21 posted on 02/09/2016 9:03:14 AM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

>> can Cruz beat the rest of these yahoos and whoever the Dems prop up?

You bet he can. With GOD’s help. Praying is good. :-)


22 posted on 02/09/2016 9:03:38 AM PST by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed was his demon-possessed tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

That’s it for me.

immigration is THE most important issue, but the Donald is goind right in my face with this.


23 posted on 02/09/2016 9:04:49 AM PST by chesley (Obama -- Muslim or dhimmi? And does it matter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; wagglebee

I listened to the interview. It’s what was said.

He was talking ABOUT huge problems and the need for everyone to pitch in. The lady said something about homosexual equality, and he replies that yes. They be equal. We need everybody to pitch in.

This is another absolutely intentional misquoting of Donald Trump.


24 posted on 02/09/2016 9:04:54 AM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: xzins

http://www.necn.com/on-air/as-seen-on/NECN_020416_BROADSIDETRUMP_6pm_NECN-367745781.html

Watch at about the 2:30 mark.


25 posted on 02/09/2016 9:05:03 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist

Way to stay classy!


26 posted on 02/09/2016 9:05:34 AM PST by subterfuge (TED CRUZ FOR POTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

The story makes no sense, given his original supporters.


27 posted on 02/09/2016 9:06:00 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
“'[Marriage] should be a states rights issue,' Trump continued. 'I can see changes coming down the line, frankly.'”

That is the Constitutional intention. "Same sex marriage" is, of course, a total oxymoron. There is no way such a marriage can be consummated as that concept has been understood throughout civilized history. But the practical legal issues involved in the very concept of marriage, itself, were left to the States by the Constitution. That is historic legal reality.

28 posted on 02/09/2016 9:06:02 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist

“This article misses the point that Ted Cruz is a nasty, cheating P***y!”

And yet, Trump would still consider him as VP.

And yet, again, Trump has come out on 2 positions and stances on Ted Cruz.

He should just stick with the wall. It is the only thing that he has been consistent on. It is the vehicle he uses in his rallies when he sees his supporters start to drift away during those rallies.

He said so himself to the New York Times.


29 posted on 02/09/2016 9:06:42 AM PST by GrouchoTex (...and ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Someone who has been married 3 times (and admits to adultery) probably isn’t the best champion for traditional marriage.


30 posted on 02/09/2016 9:06:56 AM PST by gdani ("I can be the most politically correct person you have ever seen")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I dislike Trump, but I don’t think his comments indicate what the article says they indicate.


31 posted on 02/09/2016 9:07:42 AM PST by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of infants, ruled by their emotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne
There is an active invasion occurring in this country and in Europe.

If DT would harp again on what is happening this month, this week, TODAY with illegal immigrants, he would be back on message with what got him his political prominence in the first place.

Cruz is kind of muted on this lately. Mentions the border invasion still but with a current lack of urgency when I've heard him recently.
32 posted on 02/09/2016 9:07:49 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

About 2:30 in:
http://www.necn.com/on-air/as-seen-on/NECN_020416_BROADSIDETRUMP_6pm_NECN-367745781.html


33 posted on 02/09/2016 9:08:15 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

That’s exactly the interview I’m talking about.

He’s talking about all the problems. He’s talking about everyone working together. “Will homosexuals be equal?” Yeah, sure, we need everyone to work together to solve our problems.


34 posted on 02/09/2016 9:08:35 AM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
LOL. Can Trump be relied on? Well we know all of our elected officials now cannot.
35 posted on 02/09/2016 9:09:20 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 ( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37
What practical difference does it make?

Wow...Trumpets using Hilaryisms. Nicely done. /s

36 posted on 02/09/2016 9:09:22 AM PST by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It wasn’t even an interview about homosexuality. That was a question thrown into a discussion about the problems of America....heroin being one of them.

Need everyone on board.


37 posted on 02/09/2016 9:09:54 AM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist
Cruz punted on Lawrence vs. Texas. Why?
38 posted on 02/09/2016 9:10:17 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 ( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
Appointing Judges matters, and CRUZ would be solid on this

So what?

No judge or Associate Justice appointee who will not swear fealty to homosexual "marriages" will be confirmed by this or any other conceivable Senate.

39 posted on 02/09/2016 9:11:39 AM PST by Jim Noble (I won't be laughing at the lies when I'm gone, and I won't question what or when or why when I'm gon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
I have heard on at least 2 interviews that Trump has claimed he will be much different once elected.

That ought to raise 5000 red flags for everyone.

40 posted on 02/09/2016 9:11:42 AM PST by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson