Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ifinnegan

Actually, it means any weapon that an infantryman might carry; not a weapon of mass destruction.


73 posted on 02/06/2016 10:51:32 AM PST by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: SVTCobra03

Which in turn doesn’t explain why for the first 120 years or so of this country’s existence, private citizens were allowed to own the weapons of mass destruction of their day - fully armed and armored private naval craft, some of which rivaled the battleships (ships of the line) of the day. See the East Indiamen merchant ships - some could see off first-rank ships of the line and lay waste to coastal cities with their armament - yet individuals could and did own them.


151 posted on 02/08/2016 1:46:31 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson