I can’t disagree with you. You make an excellent argument against it. To bad the feminist don’t understand your points.
There are way to many non-combat rolls for women in the Military. But they are bound and determined to force it on the Military, just as they forced COMMIE CORE and 0’Care down our throats.
I know my husband would not have liked to serve with females on ship, homosexuals or transgenders. He is a 20 yr career Navy Ret. SCPO. Nor would my cousin’s husband who was 30 year career USAF officer. But they served in a different Military than today’s.
Obama is bound and determined to do this, no matter how wrong it is.
I agree, I think there are a lot of ways women can honorably serve, and have served.
Women in combat is wrong, and there are people linking the two. I can unlink them, and while I still don’t think women should be drafted even in a time of war (to me that is like eating the seed corn for next years crop) but I think there are plenty of options to serve honorably and well without putting women into combat roles.
If there were people pushing for the draft right now but not for women in combat, I might not be as alarmed.
But the fact is quite the opposite-there is a significant push to get women into combat, and nobody is really talking about the draft, except as a tool to frame women in the combat role. Heck, in the USN, it is a done deal already, and they are far worse off for it.
I’ve said it before and will again, it isn’t that there aren’t enough men to serve in the military, it is that this is liberal social experiment.
And by default, that makes it wrong.