Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Republican Party of Virginia rescinds ‘oath’ requirement
the bull elephant ^ | January 30, 2016 | Steve Albertson

Posted on 01/31/2016 3:27:08 PM PST by dontreadthis

The party's governing body has voted by acclamation to no longer require a Statement of Affiliation to vote in the March 1 GOP presidential primary

The Republican Party of Virginia’s State Central Committee (“SCC”), meeting in Richmond, today voted to remove the requirement it had adopted in September 2015 to require voters in its March 1 presidential primary to sign a statement indicating they are Republican. The move comes after outcry from various quarters of the party, notably from Donald Trump, who excoriated the party for what he alleged was a move designed to exclude voters sympathetic to his candidacy. However, this does not seem to have made any impact of the SCC’s decision. The SCC’s vote in September was to adopt a specific, GOP-branded form that included the term “Property of the Republican Party of Virginia.” The intention was for the forms to then be collected and returned to the party. However, what the Democrat-controlled State Board of Elections adopted was a form generated by Department of Elections staff keeping only 9 of the original 47 words adopted by the SCC, and replacing GOP branding with intimidating state board legalese. Further, the Attorney General issued guidance that those people refusing to sign must be offered a provisional ballot instead, under the federal Help America Vote Act. However, even though tens of thousands of people might cast provisional ballots in this scenario, the code of Virginia (24.2-545) requires that voters must meet the requirements set forth by the party for participation in the party’s presidential primary. In other words, every local electoral board would be bound by law to NOT COUNT those provisional ballots. One need not be a political guru to imagine what the headlines around the state and across the nation would be the day after the March 1 primary when tens of thousands of GOP primary voters had their votes cast aside. And, one does not have to be a lawyer to imagine what a candidate who felt injured by this would seek as a remedy. Recognizing this, the SCC adopted a motion from First District GOP Chairman Eric Herr, and seconded by Fourth District GOP Chairman Jack Wilson, to rescind the requirement. The motion made clear that it was motivated not by any disagreement about the party’s right of free association, but by recognition that the McAuliffe administration and Attorney General Mark Herring had made exercise of that First Amendment right nearly impossible. The motion was adopted by acclamation, meaning there were no dissenting votes.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: rpv; va2016; virginia
The move comes after outcry from various quarters of the party, notably from Donald Trump, who excoriated the party for what he alleged was a move designed to exclude voters sympathetic to his candidacy.
1 posted on 01/31/2016 3:27:08 PM PST by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

oops.paragraphs


2 posted on 01/31/2016 3:27:50 PM PST by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Trump wins again.


3 posted on 01/31/2016 3:29:37 PM PST by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittancez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

As well they should have, the document was worthless.


4 posted on 01/31/2016 3:30:51 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Maybe, maybe not. Virginia GOP is a closed party. State-level candidates are selected by a convention; which only a fraction of the party members attend.

It is the very essence of Establishment and Trump and Cruz are crashing their party.

We shall see.


5 posted on 01/31/2016 3:33:37 PM PST by txnativegop (Tired of liberals, even a few in my own family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

So Dems get to help pick our nominee? One of the few things ee do right in Pennsylvania is having closed primaries.


6 posted on 01/31/2016 3:40:37 PM PST by HonorInPa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Both national major parties are trying to control politics at all levels through their elites and their big donors. They are ignoring the voters and believe in the near future, the voters will be irrelevant. This is why both parties are collapsing, at least at the federal level and before long at all levels.

Look where we are for this year’s Presidential election.

The Democrat has another criminal in Hillary who cares for nothing except herself. The other candidate is not even a Democrat, but a diehard Communist who will seal their overturn of what was the Democrat Party.

The Republican have Donald Trump who is saying the right things, but has never shown any of those things in words and deeds for the past 30 Years. No one would have called him a conservative 5 years ago. Ted Cruz is the real deal, a true conservative but he will probably destroy the Republican Party, probably the best possible outcome of this election.


7 posted on 01/31/2016 3:44:14 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Trump effect for sure. Stuffing your tail up your ash isn’t fun is it morons?


8 posted on 01/31/2016 3:48:33 PM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

In 2014, Cantor’s allies didn’t help the situation when they “slated” key GOP leaders from his district (replacing them with Cantor cronies). The backlash was harsh.


9 posted on 01/31/2016 3:57:50 PM PST by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


10 posted on 01/31/2016 4:00:33 PM PST by DoughtyOne (the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Well, he’s right and it’s a dang shame that Virginia backed off.

The primary is for the party to select it’s candidate, not for the other party to select one for them.


11 posted on 01/31/2016 4:05:02 PM PST by Outlaw76 (Citizens on the Bounce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw76

Well, he’s right and it’s a dang shame that Virginia backed off.

The primary is for the party to select it’s candidate, not for the other party to select one for them.


Easy solution here. Close the primary. But the GOPe doesn’t want to do that. I don’t hear Trump objecting to Florida’s closed primary system.


12 posted on 01/31/2016 4:07:41 PM PST by lodi90 (TRUMP Force 1 lifting off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

I sense you are causing a disturbance in the force.

And now your neighbors all know!


13 posted on 01/31/2016 4:15:46 PM PST by DoughtyOne (the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

LOL!
Bearing Drift will be praising the Party masters for dropping this, as they praised the Party masters for instigating it.


14 posted on 01/31/2016 4:23:29 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I’m against open primaries for Republicans, for them for Democrats.

:)


15 posted on 01/31/2016 6:09:38 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HonorInPa

“So Dems get to help pick our nominee?”
It worked well for the GOPe in Mississippi. Expect to see it repeated again through out the primaries.


16 posted on 01/31/2016 10:08:45 PM PST by MCF (If my home can't be my Castle, then it will be my Alamo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson