Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I think I've got Hillary's email statements figured out. (vanity)
me

Posted on 01/22/2016 9:29:08 AM PST by Leaning Right

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Leaning Right; Liz
Hillary says: "...nothing that this says changes the fact that I never sent or received material marked classified."

So I looked it up. There is no Classified level in the US government system! The levels are Unclassified, Confidential, Secret, and Top Secret.

OMG you've got it... you connected the dots...

21 posted on 01/22/2016 9:53:30 AM PST by GOPJ (It's more important to have a gun in your hand than a cop on the phone- Florida Sheriff Grady Judd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
it does not have to be "marked classified" to BE classified

Right. And that's what the federal prosecutor will argue at Hillary's perjury trial. (OK, I'm dreaming a little bit there.)

22 posted on 01/22/2016 9:54:16 AM PST by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LonePalm

Agreed...she has successfully gotten the media and the public to fixate on ‘markings’. But not all information can be ‘marked’.

If Hillary has a conversation with the Prime Minister of Israel about a secret topic, she can’t just hook on to the wifi at a coffee shop and relay the contents of the conversation...ie, its secret by nature, and cannot be marked, but must be treated that way.


23 posted on 01/22/2016 9:55:17 AM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
Thanks for writing up this vanity ;-)

You're welcome. I'm always happy to help the cause. And I'm hoping that this post will qualify me as an expert witness at Hillary's perjury trial.

24 posted on 01/22/2016 9:56:21 AM PST by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

The worst part of it is she could still garner nearly half of the votes from a prison cell.


25 posted on 01/22/2016 9:57:20 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Liberals are the Taliban of America, trying to tear down any symbol that they don't like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

My first reaction was aww bs, everyone knows that unclassified means not classified and the C, S, and TS rankings are classifications. But then the sense of it came on and I know that the precise words used by a Clinton have to be parsed carefully to determine the loopholes. What everyone knows about words is not the same as what lawyers know about words. She may be a poor attorney but she learned well to choose the words proper to obfuscation and alternate meanings. Cruz and Rubio, and disappointingly, Levin do that, too, but in less convoluted manner.


26 posted on 01/22/2016 9:59:20 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
Hillary says: "...nothing that this says changes the fact that I never sent or received material marked classified."

The key word here is "marked." It's her version of "It depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is."

27 posted on 01/22/2016 10:00:31 AM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

True. But if it’s NOT marked ‘Classified’ then what she’s saying is technically true...

“Headers’ that mean ‘classified’ are also not the same as the word ‘Classified’... Depends on what the definition of is is...


28 posted on 01/22/2016 10:04:06 AM PST by GOPJ (It's more important to have a gun in your hand than a cop on the phone- Florida Sheriff Grady Judd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
You are correct but you overlook that her statement has a dual meaning. Also note that SAP documents are 'higher' than TS and are marked with a code word in the following manner: "TOP SECRET/(Codeword)"

The OTHER meaning to her comment is that if she DID receive or send classified information, it was not marked with ANYTHING. But regardless, such information is STILL classified whether or not its marked and the Secretary of State of ALL people should know classified information when she sees it!

I think Hillary is leaving herself an out, and that is that she DID have classified information but it wasn't marked with ANY classification marking.

29 posted on 01/22/2016 10:04:36 AM PST by CivilWarBrewing (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
True. But if it’s NOT marked ‘Classified’ then what she’s saying is technically true...

That's exactly right... heard it on Fox the other night, from Judge Napolitano, I think. There is no classification of “classified” so she is technically correct. And it's definitely deliberate choice of words that never change, no matter what. It reminded me of when Bill kept saying, I did not “have sex” with that woman, and later insisting that “have sex” meant intercourse, so it was not a lie. They are masters of deceit!

30 posted on 01/22/2016 10:38:36 AM PST by GizzyGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
What a daring foreign spy is Mata Hillary.


31 posted on 01/22/2016 10:43:15 AM PST by PhilDragoo (Onambla: Marxist-Muslim crack-smoking closet queen Exp 1-20-17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Of course it’s misleading and the media know it, they’re helping her.

If you received an email that said (something to the effect of), “Our top operative, Mr. Whomever, has infiltrated ISIS headquarters...” - do you need to ask if it is unclassified? Of course it’s secret. It is secret by its nature. They get training on this, they know it, Hillary knows it. There doesn’t need to be any markings, it may just not yet have gone through the gears of government to get some “official” markings.

Hillary can play all the word games she wants. At the end of the day, the FBI can’t ignore this. I can’t imagine what crazy events are ongoing internally. Obama is probably holding a knife to someones throat to not move forward, giving him the ability to control Hillary and continue his legacy. If Hillary steps out of line by one inch, she’s done and she knows it.


32 posted on 01/22/2016 10:43:57 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

follow me @DCCogan doing at least one a day

33 posted on 01/22/2016 10:44:58 AM PST by doug from upland (Some of you keep telling yourself -- Romney would have been as bad or worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Bingo. She intentionally had material unmarked, as a wall of mud for her future defense if necessary. This is evidence of prior, deliberate, informed intent to violate the law, and should lead to maximum sentences (life x 1200+ charges, which from her appearance could be 1 to 10 years).


34 posted on 01/22/2016 10:46:33 AM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic
I can’t imagine what crazy events are ongoing internally. Obama is probably holding a knife to someones throat to not move forward, giving him the ability to control Hillary....

You're probably right, but this is how crazy this thing is. It's also possible that Obama is holding a knife to someone's throat TO move forward, to get Hillary out of there soon and replace her with Biden.

35 posted on 01/22/2016 10:53:47 AM PST by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

You have to classify what classified means he he.


36 posted on 01/22/2016 11:10:02 AM PST by freebird5850 (Barry, just how are you going to lie out of this one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: freebird5850

Hillary - is that you?


37 posted on 01/22/2016 11:15:27 AM PST by GOPJ (It's more important to have a gun in your hand than a cop on the phone- Florida Sheriff Grady Judd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
I'm sorry but I think you still do not understand the situation.

If classified material (information) is to be transmitted from one point to another (one person to another) there are prescribed and proscribed means, media, methods, and markings for said classified material depending on the nature and/or source(s) if the information.

Classified electronic communications MUST be sent via approved GOVERNMENT communications channels and encrypted to the classification level of the information, or above. (You can send Confidential information with Top Secret level encryption but not vice versa.)

Diplomatic communications by their very nature are treated as Top Secret and would not be sent through an unsecured (public) Wi-Fi system whether they are marked or not.

Again, whether the e-mails were marked or not is irrelevant! She knew what was classified and how it should have been handled. Knowing failure to properly handle the information or failure to report misbehavior in others are a 'per se' felonies.

"Ceterum censeo 0bama esse delendam."

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

38 posted on 01/22/2016 11:34:54 AM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LonePalm

What was known already was bad enough ... now this popped up today via Catherine Herridge:

Clinton e-mail contained intelligence about human spying
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4717023285001/clinton-e-mail-contained-intelligence-about-human-spying/?#sp=show-clips


39 posted on 01/22/2016 11:46:35 AM PST by Qiviut (In Islam you have to die for Allah. The God I worship died for me. [Franklin Graham])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

I think we have a winner.


40 posted on 01/22/2016 12:03:28 PM PST by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson