Posted on 01/20/2016 5:58:01 AM PST by C19fan
This month, Lena Dunham, wearing a red, white and blue sweater dress with the word âHillaryâ emblazoned across the chest, told voters how Hillary Clinton had overcome sexism in her political career. âThe way she has been treated is just more evidence of the fact that our country has so much hatred toward successful women,â Ms. Dunham, the creator and star of the HBO series âGirls,â said at a Clinton campaign event in Manchester, N.H.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Wow, the Slimes?
More tea leaves showing that the establishment is planning to ease her off the ticket.
90s my a$$. Try ever decade from then until now. NYT still trying to get off that “been there done that” crap.
Where’s the “BARF ALERT”?
And isn’t it fitting that Hillary would have someone campaigning for her who molested her own sister and made false rape accusations.
Hillary seems attracted to perverts
I’ve never heard of Lena Dunham. Looks like I haven’t missed anything.
God Bless Donald Trump for being able to get the New York Times -- the Liberal Bible -- to write a story about how Hillary enabled Bill's sexual assaults and how she worked with him to destroy the female victims.
Can Hillary run if she is in jail? Obama will decide with his D.A. if Hillary goes to jail. He knows more about this than we would ever know. He will try to change the subject now to protect the Clintons. Trump will keep the topic alive.
Fwiw, The author’s husband, Robert Ennis, is a Vice President at Goldman Sachs.
Btw, I saw a video of Billy Jeff the other day. I think he’ s not long for this world.
I hope you are wrong. Hill would ride that right into the Whitehouse IMHO.
Yeah,.
And if Bill were to croak during this election cycle and she were the nominee it would be worth a couple million sympathy votes.
Barf.
Did you get around to reading the article? It's actually astonishing to see it printed by the Times.
Millenial women, who are too young to remember the Clinton scandals of the mid 1990’s, will not accept the “it’s private behavior” excuse that women accepted back then.
Even some Democrats who participated in the effort to discredit the women acknowledge privately that today, when Mrs. Clinton and other women have pleaded with the authorities on college campuses and in workplaces to take any allegation of sexual assault and sexual harassment seriously, such a campaign to attack the women's character would be unacceptable.
It's not like the 90's are ancient history, Ladies!
More so, Hillary is STILL doing it, when you consider that Juanita Broderick, Paula Jones, and Kathleen Willey are still very much alive, and their abuse/rape still not acknowledged by Hillary.
Until you REJECT her, you're all a bunch of hypocrites!
Don't whine to me about your sexual harassment issues in the mean time, because--YAWN--you're not serious...
I read the section of the article that was listed on the post. That's what prompted my "Barf Alert" suggestion. You are correct, when you read the entire article it provides a different perspective.
The facts have always been available to the feminazis. Even now, their criticism is tempered and THEY ALL STILL SUPPORT HILLARY !
As I've said in other posts, Hillary could be caught on video murdering her opposition and she would still be supported by the feminazis and other liberals.
Good on you. I would be careful with the “them” language. There are all manner of of feminists from the wacko birds to “Feminists for Life.”
Chipping away at any blind adoration to her is a thing greatly to be desired.
I'm not tracking.
I am just saying that little chinks can turn into cracks that can make pieces of what appears solid to fall off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.