"It cannot ... be taken to have settled the law of the United States," said the statement from the American Principles Project.
"We call on all federal and state officeholders: To refuse to accept Obergefell as binding precedent for all but the specific plaintiffs in that case. To recognize the authority of states to define marriage, and the right of federal and state officeholders to act in accordance with those definitions. To pledge full and mutual legal and political assistance to anyone who refuses to follow Obergefell for constitutionally protected reasons. To open forthwith a broad and honest conversation on the means by which Americans may constitutionally resist and overturn the judicial usurpations evidence in Obergefell."
Thank you for referencing that article amorphous. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.
Regarding the Supreme Courts decision in Obergefell, quit picking on pro-gay activist justices !
Noting that Congress has always had the constitutional authority to remove bad-apple presidents and justices from office, please consider the following.
Just like corrupt federal lawmakers protect their voting records by letting lawless Obama get away with stealing legislative branch powers to make not only unpopular, but unconstitutional executive orders, lawmakers are likewise letting activist justices steal legislative powers to wrongly legislate the constitutionally fictitious rights like gay ”marriage” from the bench imo.
And not only are federal lawmakers letting justices steal legislative powers, but they are letting justices breach the Founding States division of state and federal government powers by stealing unique, 10th Amendment-protected legislative powers to do so, unique state power to regulate marriage in this example.
Note that by protecting their voting records by letting the corrupt executive and judicial branches do their dirty work for them, corrupt lawmakers have a better chance of being reelected by low-information voters.
Remember in November !
When patriots elect Trump, or whatever conservative they elect as president, they also need to do this. They need to elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support the new president, while prohibiting the corrupt executive and judicial branches, along with Constitution-ignoring federal bureaucrats, from stealing legislative branch powers.
Also consider that such a Congress would probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.
Is Obama going to cry crocodile tears again?
I’m guessing by tomorrow, someone will have invoked “Fort Sumter” to get the Hussein Heads all riled up again about “The South” and symbols of racism and intolerance, etc. in defense of their Fraud god-king.
This sounds like an “Executive Order”
Gee, I wonder where he got that idea.
I was just thinking today, that the Supreme Court has no authority to make law out of whole cloth. Good on Justice Roy Moore for recognizing their lack of standing to overrule Alabama on this.
Obergfel is totally unconstitutional. Every state who does not want gay marriage should just ignore the ruling.
God bless this judge and anyone who fights back against the tide of cultural decline, the destruction of our language and civilization, and the acceptance/celebration of perversion.
Gutsy
Homosexuality is an abomination, obviously:
Leviticus 18:22 (NIV)
“Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.”
Correct.
What happened to those psychiatrists that were curing people with a homosexuality problem, do they still practice? Here is their website:
(I’m not suggesting anyone here needs it, hehe)