Skip to comments.
Obama details executive action on gun restrictions
WaPo ^
| 01-04-2016
| David Nakamura and Juliet Eilperin
Posted on 01/04/2016 4:41:09 PM PST by NRx
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: NRx
"Obama details executive action on gun restrictions"
You can be certain what he says means nothing more than the creation of a smoke screen to cover his real intentions.
To: PROCON
62
posted on
01/04/2016 6:09:06 PM PST
by
Red Steel
(Ted Cruz: 'I'm a Big Fan of Donald Trump')
To: NRx
The Obama administration on Monday unveiled a series of new executive actions aimed at reducing gun violence It took only 18 words for the WaPo to deliver their first lie.
63
posted on
01/04/2016 6:09:40 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(Despotism to liberalism: from Tiberius to Torquemada, and back again.)
To: NRx
What’s being held hostage is American rights.
IF he could flap them big “dumbo” ears as much as he flaps his lying mouth, he’d be a rocket in outer space.
64
posted on
01/04/2016 6:11:33 PM PST
by
lgjhn23
(It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
To: NRx
So the president who tells me that ANY attempt to regulate or control who comes into this country is a violation of our Constitution, even though the Constitution says nothing about refugees is now telling me that his gun control regulations don’t violate the Constitution even though the Constitution says the right to bear arms shall not be infringed?
That logic makes perfect sense in Obamaland. :)
65
posted on
01/04/2016 6:15:31 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
To: NRx
So a government that has raised my taxes, taken my freedom and treated me like dirt is now looking at ways to disarm me?
That’s smart of them. :)
66
posted on
01/04/2016 6:17:37 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
To: NRx
Ryan/Mcconnell will fund it all
67
posted on
01/04/2016 6:18:12 PM PST
by
RginTN
To: NRx
I want to know how any judge would except an Executive order in court? They are simply not the law.
Any State Governor should declare them Null and void in there states and threaten to put any fed who tries to enforce them in Jail.
68
posted on
01/04/2016 6:20:09 PM PST
by
Revel
To: NRx
Screw that bastard!! HINWAS
69
posted on
01/04/2016 6:23:04 PM PST
by
WENDLE
(Trump is not bought . He is no puppet.)
To: NRx
"Under the president's actions, the FBI will hire more than 230 additional examiners and other personnel to help process new background checks, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has established a new investigation center to keep track of illegal gun trafficking online and will devote $4 million and additional personnel to enhance the National Integrated Ballistics Information Network."Isn't that all stuff they are supposed to be doing now?
(I'm all for more personnel to speed up background checks. My last "instant" background check took about 4 hours.)
70
posted on
01/04/2016 6:25:55 PM PST
by
Sooth2222
("In a democracy, the people get the government they deserve." - Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859))
To: Chewbarkah
"It will be whatever the feds say it is, case by case, rendering you vulnerable whatever you do."
That will not stand in any court in the land. Not once.
71
posted on
01/04/2016 6:36:01 PM PST
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
To: NRx
ATF has exactly SIX people examining Form 1 and Form 4 submissions. That's why it takes forever to get a tax stamp for a suppressor or SBR. Why does it take 230 more people for NICS checks? Those are computer based submit/approve operations.
72
posted on
01/04/2016 6:37:45 PM PST
by
Myrddin
To: NRx
..."One key provision would require more gun sellers , especially those who do business on the Internet and at gun shows, to be licensed and would force them to conduct background checks on potential buyers.".......
73
posted on
01/04/2016 6:37:48 PM PST
by
caww
To: cowboyusa
74
posted on
01/04/2016 6:40:31 PM PST
by
caww
Keep Free Republic Alive with YOUR Donations!
Make a difference.
PLEASE Contribute Today!
75
posted on
01/04/2016 6:41:55 PM PST
by
RedMDer
(Support Free Republic and Keep FReedom ALIVE!)
To: UCANSEE2
76
posted on
01/04/2016 6:52:55 PM PST
by
angelcindy
("If you follow the crowd ,you get no further than the crowd!")
To: amorphous
I can testify to the truth of your graphic. I have a family member who is a licensed gun dealer as a side job and he can barely keep up. He posts his wares on a gun broker site, sends out some emails, makes trips to the post office, and the cash just rolls in. He just wanted something to do for his retirement years in the future, but he could easily quit his job and just do this full time.
77
posted on
01/04/2016 7:01:06 PM PST
by
Semper911
(When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
To: NRx
....the FBI will hire more than 230 additional examiners and other personnel to help process new background checks, Which is why the omnibus spending bill was soooo very stupid. Congress has NO real way to stop this via the budget. Pathetic.
78
posted on
01/04/2016 7:08:10 PM PST
by
SoFloFreeper
(Obama hates the three Cs: Christianity, Constitution, and capitalism.)
To: NRx
....the FBI will hire more than 230 additional examiners and other personnel to help process new background checks, Which is why the omnibus spending bill was soooo very stupid. Congress has NO real way to stop this via the budget. Pathetic.
79
posted on
01/04/2016 7:11:28 PM PST
by
SoFloFreeper
(Obama hates the three Cs: Christianity, Constitution, and capitalism.)
To: ClayinVA
âThe Social Security Administration is also exploring a process that would submit information about beneficiaries with mental health disabilities to the background check system.â
It is my experience that most of the people who get SSI for behavioral health “disabilities” are minorities and lesbians who have gotten someone to diagnose them with bipolar disorder. That’s a real racket and you can be sure that all of those people vote dummiecrat.
80
posted on
01/04/2016 7:26:48 PM PST
by
43north
(BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% red.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson