Posted on 12/20/2015 12:45:12 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
Since the saga’s launch in 1977, the irresistible force of the Star Wars phenomenon has affected young and old alike. It’s nearly impossible to get through a day without being brushed, bumped, or bombarded by a Star Wars image, allusion, or advertisement. This week week, the seventh installment, The Force Awakens, hits theaters.
No less than Steven Spielberg predicts it will be “the biggest movie ever.”
So why do so many across generations, cultures, and religions find Star Wars so captivating? Is it the dynamic characters? The spectacular score? The breathtaking special effects?
Sure, these contribute to the magic of Star Wars. But I don’t think any of them can explain the mystery that has sparked wonder in millions for almost 40 years. To grasp the irresistible force of Star Wars, I believe we need to look behind the fictional veil and catch a glimpse of the transcendent themes that give the epic its emotive power.
The Star Wars saga trades in universal themes of fall and depravity, struggle and conflict, sacrifice and redemption, heroism and hope. In this way, it sings truth to our souls. George Lucas, the creator of Star Wars, drank deeply from the wells of human experience and incorporated themes that have repeatedly appeared in epic poems, plays, legends, myths, and religious beliefs of various cultures through millennia.
In fact, Lucas hacked into a “formula” storytellers often call “the hero’s journey.” With this narrative pattern many storytellers, screenwriters, and authors grasp and hold their audiences by tapping into universal human experiences:
Though everything in the Star Wars universe is fiction, these motifs touch on something real. In the same way a fable or parable might be used to illustrate moral principles, stories like Star Wars paint pictures of profound existential and spiritual truths that all humans feel but few can put into words.
Two books lie on display on a tiny table in my office. The first, The Force of Star Wars (1977), allegorizes the original film and suggests it mirrors specific events of biblical end-time prophecies. The author calls readers to faith in Christ and promotes a clear Christian redemption narrative.
The second, Religion of the Force (1983), exposes the allegedly heavy-handed New Age religious propaganda of Lucas’s universe. It suggests Star Wars promotes a false religion, that the “Force” is pantheism, and that Christians should flee from all things Star Wars before they damage their souls.
So which is it? Was Lucas a reluctant prophet of God’s story who spoke better than he knew? Or was he a sinister antichrist who continues to lure dupes into the pit of hell? Is Star Wars an allegory conveying the gospel of Jesus, or a drama promoting doctrines of demons?
Clearly, the two books represent antithetical approaches to engaging popular culture. And in my view, both veer too far in their perspectives. Let me suggest a middle-of-the-road alternative—one that appreciates the underlying “truths” of the Star Wars narrative without confusing metaphorical fiction with spiritual fact.
In the mythical Star Wars universe, the “light side of the Force” serves as a metaphor for the invisible, powerful source of goodness, truth, and life. According to Star Wars lore, somehow an imbalance occurred in the universe with the intrusion of the dark side—a metaphor for evil, falsehood, and death.
Star Wars uses these metaphors of light versus dark to frame the epic struggle to restore “balance” to the Force. Characters like Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader play out their personal struggles with temptation, fall, conflict, and redemption in the context of this primal battle between good and evil—Empire versus Rebels, Jedi versus Sith. And in the Star Wars universe, balance isn’t achieved by equalizing the dark side and the light, but by vanquishing the dark side entirely. The onslaught of evil brought chaos; the victory of the light brings true order.
The images of darkness and light also characterize the Christian saga of creation, fall, redemption, and restoration. In this metanarrative, God first dispelled darkness with light (Gen. 1:1–3). He then crowned his newly ordered creation with human beings—his personal agents of glory and goodness. Though humans were meant to mediate God’s order in the world, evil plunged the universe into devastation and chaos.
At just the right time, however, God sent his light into the world to drive out the darkness (John 1:4, 9). God’s Son—the prophesied chosen one (Isa. 42:1)—battled the forces of darkness (John 1:5), surrendered his life to save the world (John 3:16), and rose from the dead in victory over death (Acts 2:24). Until the King’s return, his loyal subjects—the children of light (1 Thess. 5:5)—are to serve as a force of light and truth against the agents of darkness and deception (Eph. 6:12). This brings a new hope to fallen humanity, drawing our gaze from the suffering of this present darkness to the glorious restoration, when death itself will be swallowed up by life eternal (1 Cor. 15:54–56).
Of course, it could be merely a coincidence that the fictional narrative of Star Wars shares some similarities with the factual metanarrative of the Bible. But there’s another explanation.
Imagine truth as pure light shining from the divine source of all truth. The light shines through every aspect of God’s created universe, but it’s also refracted through human image-bearers whose imaginations project a spectrum of stories onto the stage of human culture.
The Star Wars writers tell the ultimate story imprecisely, imperfectly, and often impurely, but almost always the big-picture themes remain: fall, struggle, sacrifice, hope, forgiveness, redemption, reconciliation, and triumph. In the end, through a cataclysmic conflict between good and evil, the dark side is vanquished and the light is victorious. All these themes become illustrations of God’s story of redemption. All serve as potential points of contact between the tellers of God’s story and a world entranced by the magical world of Star Wars.
As a theologian I don’t embrace Star Wars as a kind of “fifth gospel.” But neither do I condemn it as devilish propaganda. Instead, I perceive the story behind the story, the metanarrative behind the myth, the fact behind the fiction. I see the contours of God’s drama of redemption even in the frames of Star Wars. And I’m reminded of the reality revealed through God’s creation and articulated in Scripture’s creation-redemption narrative—the story centered on the person and work of Jesus Christ in his first and second comings.
Thought I would add a different perspective for discussion.
Saw it last night in 3d and thought it was stupid. Typical PC Disney BS.
Theory 4
People enjoy mindless entertainment.
Win.
I think something with the staying power of this franchise is more than mere entertainment.
Seeing parallels and influences of world views in the fiction isn’t so tough, is it?
In 1977 I saw Star Wars on opening weekend at the Coronet Theater in SF. One needs to remember that Jimmy Carter was president at the time, destroying our country economically. High inflation, long gas lines, rising housing costs beyond peoples' ability to cope. We needed mindless entertainment to weather the storm of Carter's policies.
I see a parallel in our times, what with Obama destroying our country.
Why do I like Star Wars? Easy, Han is cool. Which is why I don’t want to see this movie.
I agree. It’s just mindless entertainment to me. Just a popcorn movie.
....”mindless entertainment... a popcorn movie”....
Yes, and that’s exactly why I will view it. I enjoy movies that take you away form the issues and times of our day.....they ARE entertaining and we all can do with some heavy doses of that these days....along with full 100% Buttered Popcorn!
And that's what I meant in my previous comment about 1977. Back then I was trying to buy a house, and prices were rising faster than my ability to save for a down payment. I settled for a house at $59,000 that was half the value of another house that was $55,000 six months earlier in 1977. Prices seemed to be rising 10 percent every few months on houses. Working my butt off barely scraping by, seeing fun movies was an escape from reality. (Those same homes are now $800,000 and up in 2015.)
I still remember standing in line in 1977 for the first one. When it was first released, I thought it sounded stupid. Next thing I knew, everybody was talking about it. I loved it because to me it was something of a return to the swashbuckling films I loved, such as Errol Flynn and Tyrone Power adventure flicks. So many 70s films were cynical and this one was just good old fashioned fun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.