Posted on 11/27/2015 6:54:38 AM PST by SJackson
Are you white?
Obviously: I am now defined racist over my skin color, not my views and some of those with a different skin color are defied as not racists and victims.
‘Racism’ - The word that toppled the West.
****************************************
Invented by the KGB expressly for that purpose
This will continue only until the huge white majority has had enough ... until enough decent people are directly affected by the actions of the savages. the outcome is a certainty ... the savages lose. The two unknowns are when will decent people have had “enough” and how many directly impacted will comprise “enough”?
One of the results of this Canadian capitulation to terrorism is that the threat to America is going to also come from our northern border.
You are correct sir. Where is that pic of Dr House nodding his head when you need it? How long will it be, before being a white guy is considered a hate crime? Unfortunately I don't believe the government will ever allow white guys to mount any serious opposition to anti white racism.
I read somewhere.
You don’t lock the doors because you hate the people outside. You lock the door because you love the people inside.
I wouldn’t want 10,000 white poor Europeans to come here either.
“Racism” is the new code word for those interested in survival.
Only a suicidal idiot would not be racist these days.
Screw the left and their PC BS!
Racism is a survival instinct which the cultural Marxists tell white people they shouldn’t have. It’s OK for brown and black people though.
There are two points about that theory:
1. Whites are no longer the majority. The "all others" category is over 51%.
2. White America is now a nation of herbivores - completely beaten down by PC and fear. There will be no rising up.
Not racist but hypocritical.
I acknowledge your points are well-founded. Perhaps I’m being optimistic, but I just don’t see Americans — unlike modern socialist Europeans — standing by while their assets and livelihoods are taken away and, ultimately, their family’s personal safety is threatened by savages.
Precisely, but, more accurately, all human beings - most especially liberals of any race - are discriminating to some degree, whether that “discrimination” applies to style of clothing, food, friends, race or any other subject. There was a time not so long ago that “discriminating” was actually a compliment.
This entire subject of racism reminds me of discussions I had with some of my foreign students. I traveled to a lot of countries and trained a LOT of foreign military personnel from many different countries while I was on active duty with the Army. My frequently frank discussions with many of my students gave me an entirely different perspective on the subject of racism.
At one point, I became very good friends with a captain from Zimbabwe. He was the blackest man I’ve every met and spoke with a very proper British accent. I was his instructor and sponsor for a stateside Army course and we had the opportunity to discuss many subjects, including racism, in a frank and respectful manner. His characterization of the tribal (and racist - particularly black on black) nature of African politics, observations about race relations in the U.S, the impact of racism on the foreign policy of African nations and other related subjects really opened my eyes.
Among my friend’s observations: 1) All African politics are tribal - not racial; relations between many African tribes are far worse than relations between blacks and whites in America; 2) He is treated far better in America than he has ever been treated in another African nation; 3) Nelson Mandela and the ANC are a far greater threat to Zimbabwe than South Africa, Zimbabwe’s primary trading partner; 4) He has never met a black American (he refused to use :African-American”) who had any awareness of African geography, African politics or the tribal/racial issues that continue to plague Africa.
Our largest threat of terrorism is coming form decisions in Washington DC.
Americans will probably fight for the personal safety of their families, but they conceded the issue on assets and livelihoods when they determined white Americans could be passed over for education and employment in favor of much less qualified preferred minorities (including white women). The resulting emasculation played a huge role in driving us to a negative birthrate - voluntary extinction.
They already ARE being taken away - parents being stripped of visitation rights by the courts, assets are already being seized via eminent domain and forfeiture in the courts (losing their jobs due to hate-crime verdicts), and the means to defend themselves slowly being stripped away through incrementalism.
And the people doing it are the ones the herbiovores keep voting in year after year.
Both the new European left and right in the U.S. and Canada are wanting a wall on the northern border and more “refugees” in each of our countries.
Montana Ranchers on Canadian Border Watch
http://canadafreepress.com/article/77077
They want the mass migrations, but they want tighter control over movements of “human resources.” Meanwhile, they plan to further grease the skids for their own globe-trotting. And yes, both sides are quite socialist and socially disturbed. We’re entering hard fascism.
Behold, a perfect example of today’s bipartisan political class.
Best of Idiocracy - Welcome to Costco
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8zNsUTWsOc
That's easy: are you white?
No, the people sponsoring the migration are.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbud8rLejLM
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.