Posted on 11/14/2015 6:48:45 AM PST by Michael van der Galien
There are three people running for President who are on the side of the citizens and the rule of law.
Santorum, Cruz and Trump.
The rest are all on the side of the illegal aliens and their employers.
If we don’t elect a President who will uphold the rule of law, the Republic is finished.
The existential threat to the country is open borders.
I’m in the Cruz camp, but will defend Trump because there is an orchestrated campaign to take him out.
The Cheap Labor Express wants to deny the citizens the ability to keep their country.
They have control of the RNC and have nominated nothing but amnesty/open borders candidates since the last amnesty.
None of that has anything to do with what I said but Thanks for trying.
Mark, climb back under your rock.
I will back down if can listen to whatever you are referring to. But an analogy should be an analogy. Please post link.
“Reagan was a hard hitter. He didn’t launch personal attacks. He attacked policy.”
I understand idolizing Reagan but haven’t forgiven him for his amnesty act. Nowadays, candidates seem to embrace the “nailing jello to a tree” policy.
Who did Trump accuse of pedophilia?
Trump didn’t accuse anyone of pedophilia - he made an analogy of a pathological disease or behavior.
It was at his rally in Iowa this week, it’s on youtube.
It wasn’t a particularly good analogy or well delivered, but what he was saying was that like child molesters, other pathological conditions can’t be cured.
I had not read Dr. Carson’s book so I was unaware that he had said he had a “pathological temper”, or that he had attacked his mother with a hammer or stabbed a friend.
I admire that he he overcame that and has been a successful surgeon.
I find it ironic that we now have a candidate being questioned as to whether he really did stab a friend or attack his mother with a hammer.
Amazingly, Trump’s twitter account jumped 20,000 subscribers in 24 hours. Usually, he gains 5,000-10,000 per day.
There is absolutely no candidate who has this kind of twitter growth not even Hillary.
Trump’s diatribe against Ben Carson made Trump look little...it was over the top and unseemingly for anyone running for POTUS. It made me uncomfortable as I suspect it made thousands, not good for Trump...at all.
My comment had nothing to do with Reagan’s policies. It has to do with demeanor. It has to do with dirt. Wallow in it and it will stick.
And Obama did cocaine and dope as a teen and later.
An individual who claimed to be his gay lover surfaced a while but no one listened.
Obama is so ineffective that I think he did way too much drugs. No one was interested yet this is quite serious.
Bill and Hillary have got a wrap sheet that is so long and so serious that it is difficult to know where to start. Certainly they should not be anywhere near running for president. They are completely disqualified. Crickets there too.
Ah! But when we get to Carson that is another matter. He needs to be fully vetted for doing things he did 50 years ago. Never mind he pulled himself out of the ghetto to become a very, very accomplished man. That simply does not count.
Obama, and the Clintons do not hold a candle to Carson and yet Carson is the bad guy. Obama and the Clintons are professional grifters and criminals.
This is totally absurd! And the attacks on Carson are bogus and will roll off of him and show that he is truly a great man.
Trump is unhinged. I have defended him somewhat in the past. But he acts about as much like POTUS as a drunken sailor on a binge. If I have made this turn you can be assured I am not alone.
And I guess Levin has first amendment rights as much as those brain dead college students.
Oh yes, I know, however, the person I questioned seems to know otherwise, so I was hoping he could enlighten me, but apparently he cannot.
I am lost. Haven’t a clue.
Clue: Levin is correct.
Proof; Ronald Reagan.
Oh...Why didn’t you just say so from the get go?!
Trump said Carson’s pathologies wete like pedophilia I think.
Thank you for your reply. I think that my objection is still that Trump should be more circumspect. Does he want to win or not?
I did in agreeing with someone else.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.