Posted on 10/28/2015 4:15:43 PM PDT by keat
Russia's intervention in Syria is "not going particularly well" and it should instead push for political transition in the country, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry's deputy Antony Blinken told France 24 television.
Russia says it has destroyed more than 800 terrorist targets in Syria since it began its campaign of air strikes on Sept. 30, an intervention Moscow says is aimed at destroying extremist Islamic militants, but which Washington says is also targeting moderate rebels opposed to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
"They cannot win in Syria, they can perhaps prevent Assad from losing, but they cannot win," Blinken said of Russia.
"Its actions on the ground in support of the regime are not going particularly well, they have made very little progress despite the onslaught of Russia airpower," he said after taking part in talks on Syria in Paris.
"Russia now has an incentive and more influence to move Assad and the regime towards a transition. There is a recognition on all sides that there is no military solution in Syria, that is a recognition that is now growing on the Russians."
Blinken also said that Russia "cannot afford to alienate virtually all of the Sunni Muslim world" and that it was clear that Shi'ite Iran would have to be part of the conversation on Syria's future in one way or another.
Asked in a separate interview on French radio RTL if Assad's departure was a prerequisite for any progress, he said: "Not a prerequisite, but the process that will be triggered must lead to Assad's departure."
"What we must do now is to define in more detail a transition process," he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
You gotta love this pathetic trash talking from out homo-oriented State Department. Bad Vlad forms a mental image of our senile botox man John effin’ and laughs himself to sleep each night. I am serious, that our State Department is heavily loaded with lesbians and gays. Been this way for years. Heavily leftist-liberal too no matter who is President.
A President Trump has to broom out as many as possible or he will regret it.
They could not be reached as they are on a cruise in their pea green boat.
They could not be reached as they are on a cruise in their pea green boat.
Does the idiot ever state what “winning” is? I can’t bring myself to read it. I think for Russia it means stabilizing Syria under Assad, diminishing the US, gaining influence, and helping raise oil prices.
I don’t see how The Russkies can lose.
The don’t have moral objectives or nation building or democracy in mind.
It’s just American government propaganda. Ignore it like Cold War-era Pravda... it has absolutely no credibility.
I don’t know if that factors in to leftist thinking. They probably side with the hostage takers.
All Putin has to do to “win” in Syria is break stuff and poop on the floor. That’s the usual Russian strategy as we saw in Ukraine. He doesn’t need a strategic victory but to merely keep Syria as a failed client state of Russia and Iran to achieve his goals.
Agreed about the embassy takeover, but that was 35 years ago. How much misery has the Sunni sect spread since then? And also before then?
I just don’t get it, Shiites are a pain, but they seem to be no worse at all than Sunnis.
And no matter who has the oil, they have to sell it eventually or elect to be broke.
But you can’t conquer ground from the air. Somebody’s troops will have to be on the ground to eject the rebels.
Didn’t the ship that Winken, Blinken and Nod sail in, sink?
After all, Blinken works for “Swiftboat Kerry”, and we sank Kerry’s boat in 2004 (re Swiftboat Veterans for the Truth About John Kerry). Unfortunately, Kerry is like the Flying Dutchman, still around, betraying America, one decade after another.
Will the last American Patriot in the State Department go to that proverbial “tunnel” and turn that f*cking “Blinken” light out?
We have had many opportunities to come to terms with the Iranians over the years. The State Department will never do it though because the Iranians seized our embassy. They'll make peace with people who bomb American planes and kill American civilians, and they'll make peace with people who have killed American soldiers and sailors, but the State Department will never make peace with Iran.
I agree with you, but I really don’t think that what may appear to be a preference has nothing to do with philosophy. There are very few non-Muslim Americans who could tell you about the philosophical differences between Sunnis and Shiites. A very large percentage of Shiites live in Iran and we’ve had a lot of trouble getting along with Iran. Kings of Saudi Arabia don’t call us Satan like Iran’s ayatollahs. We seem to be able to do business with Saudi Arabia. Like Oliver Wendell Holmes said, “A page of history is worth a volume of logic.” Someday, things may be different.
I'm comfortably certain that they alienated themselves long ago, and intentionally so. They're not exactly the most gregarious and collegial bunch, Mr Kerry.
“They cannot win in Syria, they can perhaps prevent Assad from losing, but they cannot win,” Blinken said of Russia.
Guess that’s why his is only a “deputy” .... wasn’t dumb enough to be a boss!
Antony Blinken sounds like Baghdad Bob. Does he know what he is talking about?
It seems to me that there are many "Baghdad Bobs" in the Obama Administration.
Really?
Well here's my forecast of the Eurasian political future. Putin is leading Russia to step up and seize the hopes of many to fight against Radical Islam. Egypt has warmed to the Russians and cooled to the USA. Israel, the same. The Mideast is realigning. Sunni powers are attracted to the US. Secular states are drifting to the Russians. That's the Mideast.
Europe has bigger changes coming. NATO is the present anchor of US power in Europe. We now have Turkey taking aggression against Kurds in Syria. NATO is supposed to come to the rescue of an aggressor? Well, NATO did criminally attack Serbia. They waged war on a nation that did not attack a NATO member. Let's see how long the citizens of Europe cheer NATO fighting on behalf of Muslims while it's elite swamp them with angry young Muslim men. Russia will have a great opportunity to supply a black market of arms to Europeans who will come to see the value arms as they get their throats cut. Putin will see an opportunity to sow discord in European nations who are NATO members. In the next decade, look for Europeans to drift to the Russian sphere of politics.
Where does this leave America. Hopefully, we can sever the cost of defending Europeans and Arabs. Let the Russians carry the cost. We have enough problems of our own to resolve.
Russia doesn’t have to “win” in Syria. Just keep the objective of maintaining and even significantly bolster Assad in Syria.
Yes, and it is not only Obama that’s reponsible for all this danger to USA and Europe, we can’t overlook the massive sell-out of most of Europe by its nations’ ruling elites
(just like how the damage is being inflicted on USA)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.