Posted on 10/26/2015 6:37:05 PM PDT by Olog-hai
There you go again. Painting
Your “liberal” name tag on an evil organization and then saying that means it’s just liberal not evil. Sorry but that’s bs, not logic. First, the evil is still there - nothing you did with your paint brush eradicated it. Second, much of what’s called “liberal” these days is patently evil anyway. So, if a layer of paint really could magically eradicate the evil of anything you brushed it onto, you’ve selected the wrong kind of paint.
Thanks. But my patience is at an end now. It was occasioned by an attack of indigestion and the medicine is kicking in now so I may get to sleep. He’s all yours for awhile anyway — ha ha - have fun. Hope you can offer him some pestle of great wisdom - or at least enlightenment. ( Pearls before Swine, pearls before swine. — why does that verse keep coming to mind? Must be the indigestion??). Smile smile smile
For a short listing of some of the evil ( or evil people ) involved in j street — you will have a hard time finding another organization more closely fitting the evil “wolves in sheeps clothing” we’re warned against) , see:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=7458
( it’s very much not what it claims to be).
Best regards -
And. Over and out.
I find it utterly repugnant and reprehensible that the left appropriated the term “liberal.” We know the definition of classic liberalism is what “Conservatives” are today. The left just hijacked the term in opposition to its label and other nice sounding words “Progressive”, all of which are merely different shades of totalitarian Socialism, all leading to the same path of evil.
Anyway, I wish you good night and relief from your indigestion (likely contributed to in no small part by certain cretins around here).
Just horrific and as bad as I believed. Anything that George Soros, Jewish-born and a youth collaborator with the Nazis and convicted felon (France), involves himself with is inherently evil.
Soros is literally Ernst Stavro Blofeld come to life.
agreed! and thanks
thanks.
and yes
thanks.
and yes
Sometimes Liberal Jews just can’t seem to cringe low enough.
hmmm...most people outside Africa are non-indigenous. But by the definition, I would say that if any people stays in a land for more than 2 or 3 generations, then they are indigenous. By that reckoning most Israelite Jews are indigenous. Some, are more than 3 generations old and the Samaritans are there since the time of Christ
the tricky thing is that many of those labelled Palestinians are also indigenous by this definition - and some may be descendents of Jews who converted to Christianity and Islam.
I don’t know faithhopecharity’s family, but I must point out that while the Nutzis slaughtered Jews, they also slaughtered gypsies (more viciously), Poles and Russians as well.
On the same side of the coin, Israel is indigenous to Jews....
Now for a short public service announcement to all on FR:
I prefer Cruz and my money goes to his campaign, hence the Cruz link. If you like someone else, donate to him/her (find your own link to do it) and if you use FR and don't donate, then please don't complain about the welfare leeches or those who have Obama Phones because, functionally, you are no different than any other FReeloader.....
GO CRUZ!! Keep it up Trump!!
Mohammad's tribe were the caretakers of the Ka'aba -- the black box (incidentally, most Arab pagans had cubic structures as their temples) which had pre-Islamic Arabic deities there like Sin called Al-illah (the god, which became Allah) and his daughter goddesses Al-Lat and Al-Uzzá and Manāt (Mohammad says in the Koran that Moslems should honour them)
Mo allegedly got a revelation from the angel Gabriel and wanted to control the Ka'aba, but was chased away. He went to Yathrib (the old name) and was helped by the Jews of that town as they thought he was bringing people to the worship of Yahweh.
Then Mo started banditry against the town of Mecca and finally conquered it. He of course, then turned against the Jews of Yathrib and slaughtered them and Yathrib became Al-Madina (the town... of Mohammad)
I am condemning no one, I am stating a simple fact.
Concur; perhaps it is latent antisemitic rage. In any case it is offensive to Jews and brings disgrace on the Gospel because the perpetrator professes to be a Christian by the user id.
I don't believe you. Israel is composed of all kinds of Jews with different religious and political persuasions. To stand with Israel one must love the Jewish people, even if you don't agree with their foolish politics. Your comments are broadly offensive to Jews and not credible.
however, to be very precise, the term "Arab" no longer stands for what it stood for in the old Testament. The "Arabs" were those from the Arabian peninsula except the Yemenis
however, since the time of Mohammad, there has been intensive Arabisation of people who are not "Arabs" in the former sense. For instance the "Palestinians" are descendants of both "arabs" but also of Jews, Samaritans, Greeks, Aramaic peoples etc. The people of Syria are a mixture of Greeks, Syriacs, Aramaics, Akkadians etc. and the people of Egypt are descendants of Copts.
But these are all called Arabs.
Specifically to the "Palestinians" -- I would wager that they have Jewish blood to some extent
The word arab in Hebrew means MIXED
Why do you make that claim ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.