Skip to comments.
Why didn't Bill O'Reilly Mention Ted Cruz Fighting for Kate's Law?
Oct.20, 2015
| Ralph Mitchell
Posted on 10/20/2015 5:59:08 PM PDT by mitchell001
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: mitchell001
Because BOR doesn’t even have half a set...
2
posted on
10/20/2015 6:00:16 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Beware the Louisiana Weasel - GOPe Plan C or make that D)
To: mitchell001
Fox and especially O’reilly will do nothing to give Cruz a positive acknowledgment...they hate him. FOX is the Jeb establishment channel.
3
posted on
10/20/2015 6:00:54 PM PDT
by
gwgn02
To: mitchell001
“Why didn’t Bill O’Reilly Mention Ted Cruz Fighting for Kate’s Law?”
Exactly. It was Cruz who stood in the senate and pled for Democrats to vote for that, for them to stand up for American’s safety. And, O’Reilly didn’t mention him, only Trump and Carson and they weren’t in the senate fighting for that bill.
4
posted on
10/20/2015 6:05:10 PM PDT
by
Marcella
(CRUZ (Prepping can save you life today.))
To: mitchell001
First it’s Fox”News”. They are all-in for Bush. Second, I can’t imagine BOR having anything positive thing to say about Ted Cruz.
It shocks me that FReepers still watch Fox”News”.
5
posted on
10/20/2015 6:05:59 PM PDT
by
FourPeas
("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
To: FourPeas
6
posted on
10/20/2015 6:07:47 PM PDT
by
gwgn02
To: mitchell001
Answer: BOR was a liberal school teacher. Anything more to be said??????????
7
posted on
10/20/2015 6:10:39 PM PDT
by
DH
(Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
To: mitchell001
BOR thinks he’s god. He and he alone will pass Kate’s Law.
8
posted on
10/20/2015 6:11:02 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(To hell with the Republican Party. I'm done with them. If I want a Lib Dem I'd vote for one.)
To: FourPeas
It makes no sense to me that FReepers who seem to have a low opinion of Bill O’Reilly care which guest he invites to appear on his program. Every thread mentioning his name includes at least one exhortation to “Don’t watch him!” - yet it seems that few follow that suggestion.
9
posted on
10/20/2015 6:12:10 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: mitchell001
Bill Idiot O’Reilly is called the Ted Baxter of cable news for good reason.
The clown is brain dead reads off lines on a TelePrompter .
10
posted on
10/20/2015 6:12:30 PM PDT
by
ncalburt
( Amnesty-media out in full force)
To: mitchell001
Ted is going to be on tomorrow night.
11
posted on
10/20/2015 6:12:43 PM PDT
by
acapesket
(all happy now?)
To: mitchell001
It’s pretty clear that it is FoxNews’ policy to limit Ted Cruz’ visibility by ignoring him and not mentioning his name as much as, and as long as, they can get away with it.
12
posted on
10/20/2015 6:13:47 PM PDT
by
House Atreides
(CRUZ or lose! Does TG have to be an ass every day?)
To: mitchell001
Cruz is too much like Reagan and O’Reilly doesn’t care for Reagan.
To: mitchell001
Bill doesn’t give credit, he takes credit!
14
posted on
10/20/2015 6:20:35 PM PDT
by
lonestar
(It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
To: bigbob
The OP asked a question. I gave my opinion. It’s a forum; that’s what people do.
15
posted on
10/20/2015 6:49:04 PM PDT
by
FourPeas
("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
To: mitchell001
Because FOX News has a blackout on the name Ted Cruz!
Geo W. Bush has outed the Establishment fear and loathing of Cruz!!!
16
posted on
10/20/2015 7:17:23 PM PDT
by
zerosix
(Native Sunflower)
To: mitchell001
Cuz he wants to be Jebby’s boy.
To: SaraJohnson
To bad; GIBBERING JEB is not going to win, at least not with my vote.
CRUZ OR LOSE.
(Trump would be an acceptable alternative).
18
posted on
10/20/2015 8:24:40 PM PDT
by
5th MEB
(Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
To: mitchell001
19
posted on
10/20/2015 8:28:11 PM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: mitchell001
Come on. Seriously? Don’t you realize the O’Reilly show has one main thrust - making Bill O’Reilly look like God + Einstein + Copernicus, et. al.)! There’s no room in that equation for any kind of shared spotlight.
20
posted on
10/20/2015 8:54:19 PM PDT
by
Rembrandt
(Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson