Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ben Carson Calls Congress a ‘Peanut Gallery,’ Urges a Bill Protecting ‘Religious Rights’
PJ Media ^ | 10/13/2015 | Nicholas Ballasy

Posted on 10/13/2015 7:22:38 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

YouTube Preview Image [1]

Republican presidential candidate Dr. Ben Carson urged Congress to pass legislation guaranteeing “religious rights” for all Americans in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision on gay marriage.

Carson, a retired neurosurgeon, said the court “essentially” changed the definition of marriage, which has worked well for “thousands of years.”

“The legislative branch, however, I would have thought would have been already prepared with legislation in case the Supreme Court came down with that decision, to make sure we preserve the rights, the religious rights of everybody. Not everybody agrees with their new definition of marriage, and it’s a conviction and a religious conviction,” Carson said at the National Press Club.

“They need to make sure that they protect people’s religious rights. They bring Johnny-Come-Lately, but I call upon Congress to do that now, because there are people who are losing their jobs, their livelihood and it’s not fair. That’s not what America was supposed to be.”

Carson, who wrote a new book with his wife, Candy, titled, A More Perfect Union: What We the People can Do to Reclaim our Constitutional Liberties [2], said the legislative branch “acts more like a peanut gallery” instead of acting on issues such as religious freedom.

“They sort of sit there and watch what the others do, sometimes complain about it, but really don’t offer any resistance, because they’re afraid somebody might blame them. News flash, they’re going to get blamed anyway. So what they really ought to be thinking about is, how do they get involved and be more proactive?” he said.

Carson attempted to clarify his stance on gay rights.

“I have nothing against gay people whatsoever. I know a lot of people don’t believe that because we live in a society now where, if you don’t accept their entire agenda, then you’re a homophobe. But you know, I personally believe that any two people, regardless of sexual orientation or anything else, have the right to associate together,” he said.

“If they want to have a legal contract drawn up which allows them to share property, have hospital visitation rights, do whatever they want, absolutely. I don’t have any problem with that. That’s the kind of country that this was designed to be, live and let live. Not impose your values on everybody else and that’s the problem.”

As the debt ceiling debate heats up, Carson suggested that Congress start to shrink the size of government to reduce the deficit.

“I mean, there are 4.1 million federal employees. I would offer that that’s too many and there are 645 federal agencies and sub-agencies, all of whom have budgets. This is absurd and we’ve had people saying, ‘If you cut the budget by one penny, it will be a disaster.’ Nancy Pelosi. I mean, this is absolutely absurd,” he said. “But we must think about the children. And that really is the main reason that I’ve gotten into the fray here, as a pediatric neurosurgeon, my whole professional career centered on the children and on the future for the children and what we had to do to improve quality of life for them. How can we in good conscience continue this charade of responsibility knowing what we are doing to their future?”

During the event, Carson was asked if he would serve as GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump’s running mate if he became the Republican nominee. Carson did not directly answer but offered some praise for Trump’s campaign.

“I believe that Donald Trump has been very useful, because he’s brought in a lot of people, brought in a lot of curiosity and enthusiasm and whoever the eventual nominee is will benefit from that, even if it’s him. That’s a good thing. So you know, that’s one of the reasons I don’t talk about him. I don’t talk about anybody else,” he said.

Carson then explained what he would look for in a vice president.

“I would obviously want somebody who is compatible with me. I would not necessarily be looking for somebody who can bring in this demographic or that demographic, because the things that have to be done are very, very serious things, quite frankly. This can’t be tampering around the edges. We’ve got to go to the heart of the matter,” he said.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; bencarson; congress; religiousliberty

1 posted on 10/13/2015 7:22:38 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Classy


2 posted on 10/13/2015 7:24:59 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Unfair to peanuts, which unlike the GOP
are not systematic sociopathic liars, traitors,
complicit slavers, complicit terrorist-supporters,
and racketeering self-EXEMPT scum.


3 posted on 10/13/2015 7:27:02 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Peanut here is being used to mean diminutive figures.


4 posted on 10/13/2015 7:28:42 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Protecting religious rights? What type of religious rights?
Protecting the rights of Aztecs to human sacrifice?
Protecting Islam from slander?
Protecting Moslems’ right to marry pre-pubescent girls?

I don’t think is a great idea. We have a First Amendment - Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of a religion....
That SHOULD be all we need.


5 posted on 10/13/2015 7:40:35 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

and Term Limits


6 posted on 10/13/2015 8:05:55 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I mean, there are 4.1 million federal employees.

That 4.1 million figure also includes those in the military. Does he propose to cut those, too?

7 posted on 10/13/2015 8:14:46 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

We already have the law. It is just being enforced in a way that stretches credulity.


8 posted on 10/13/2015 8:28:17 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Carson paraphrasing Robert E. Lee, so cool.


9 posted on 10/13/2015 9:03:57 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (CA the sanctuary state for stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

a bill protecting christian religious rights must also protect muslim religious rights. and guess which would get precedence? say ‘hello sharia’


10 posted on 10/13/2015 9:04:08 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All

Wow! Carson is getting to be as “tough” as Trump. He just says it a little softer.


11 posted on 10/13/2015 10:42:13 AM PDT by Din Maker (GOP Gov. Susana Martinez of NM for VP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle

a bill protecting christian religious rights must also protect muslim religious rights.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________—

Hell, Muslims already have their “religious rights” in this country. The only group you can discriminate against, and get away with it, is Christians.


12 posted on 10/13/2015 10:55:42 AM PDT by Din Maker (GOP Gov. Susana Martinez of NM for VP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson