Posted on 10/06/2015 5:18:47 PM PDT by markomalley
Federal employees on average earned 78 percent more in total compensation than private sector workers in 2014, according to a new study from a conservative think tank.
The Cato Institute’s Chris Edwards compared data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis to show that, in his view, civilian federal workers are overcompensated. Factoring both salary and benefits, Edwards pointed to BEA data showing the average federal employee earns about $119,000 annually, compared to the private sector worker who earns $67,000 per year. When comparing just salaries, feds collect 50 percent bigger paychecks, Edwards said.
The wage gap between the federal and private sectors has grown since the 1990s, Cato’s director of tax policy studies found. The divide has doubled since 1990, when it was just 39 percent. The growth, he said, came from not just raising pay levels and offering more generous benefits, but also a more “top-heavy” bureaucracy that routinely moves employees into higher salary brackets and redefines jobs as higher earning positions.
“The federal government has become an elite island of secure and high-paid employment, separated from the ocean of average Americans competing in the economy,” Edwards wrote in his findings.
The Cato study examines raw compensation data, and does not account for any fundamental differences in the demographics of the federal workforce or the work it does.
“I want to stress the importance of comparing apples to apples,” said Robert Goldenkoff, director of strategic issues at the Government Accountability Office and author of a 2012 report examining the federal-private pay gap, of the new study. “Federal employees tend to be better educated and work in jobs that require higher skill levels compared to non-federal jobs, so Cato's results comparing average wages of feds to other sectors are both not surprising and don't tell the whole story. More rigorous, sophisticated analysis is needed.”
Several efforts have been made at such analyses, comparing federal and private sector pay based either in job-related attributes or individuals' personal attributes. The Federal Salary Council, a group made up of union representatives and pay experts that advises the President’s Pay Agent, has consistently found federal workers are severely underpaid compared to the private sector. Other conservative think tanks, such as the American Enterprise Institute and the Heritage Foundation, found compensation favored feds, but by less than Cato’s findings. USA Today and the Project on Government Oversight both found a 20 percent gap in favor of federal workers, while the Congressional Budget Office has said the divide depends on education breakdowns of high school, bachelor’s degree or professional degree.
In its analysis, GAO said there is no perfect way for making the measurement. The Office of Personnel Management has attributed any gap to federal employees tending to be older and more experienced than the average private sector worker. This chart shows the various findings in recent studies, arranged from smallest to largest federal pay gaps.
In the Cato report, Edwards said groups representing federal employees have successfully blocked any significant reforms to their compensation structure.
“Federal workers are a powerful special-interest group, and they are effective lobbyists,” Edwards wrote. “Federal unions actively oppose legislators who support restraining worker pay.”
He added that it is not just “rocket scientists” who earn inflated salaries, but “regulator white-collar” employees as well. Feds enjoy the added benefit of better job protection than their private sector counterparts, Edwards said, and pointed to their lower “quit rate” as further evidence that they know they have it good.
“In the past, there was a view that it was a privilege for citizens to serve the public in a federal agency, and that federal pay should be fairly modest,” Edwards said. “Unfortunately, that sort of thinking has gone out the window as the federal compensation advantage has continued to increase.”
Nothings greedier that the average lard-assed bureaucrat.
I believe Gov't agencies at all levels encourage workers to get college degrees even if they are not germane to the work the worker is doing so that the agencies can make the exact same argument made here that gov't workers deserve more because they are 'better' educated.
of course they do, they won the job lottery
Yep. I have family working in it, and they complain, but they have it better than the rest of us.
Well-paid OCCUPIERS.
The well-heeled State against the threadbare Nation.
Intellectually dishonest scholarship.
While it may well be that federal employees are over compensated compared to private sector (and I suspect they may be, since private industry has chopped health and retirement benefits), you can't prove it from this analysis. Compare like jobs - accountants to accountants, lawyers to lawyers, secretaries (does anyone still have those?) to secretaries, doctors to doctors, loan officers to loan officers, etc.
I do think we have enough evidence to conclude that the author of this study is overpaid compared to government workers.
They make up for it by putting in 78% less effort than private sector employees
What’s the point of linking to the article if you are going to go ahead and post the entire article anyway as you have, and waste expensive bandwidth, instead of just posting a few lines as an excerpt, as is required by FR guidelines?
Any easy way to cut average federal pay would be to go back to the draft, and pay soldiers the inflation adjusted equivalent of what they were paid in World War II.
Obviously this couldn’t be true because the President himself told us - shortly after his inauguration - that “public servants” such as himself took a HUGE pay cut and worked countless hours for the greater good of the nation. Would such a valiant American hero lie to us???
and the Billions wasted on Obama’s Czars + their staff + offices + transport
I worked there.
That is hardly a generalized truth. In certain areas yes. In a larger majority, no.
How many private-sector jobs allow nappy time?
You worked where?
Thank you so much for the lesson in posting articles. Greatly appreciated.
BTW, if you review the Updated FR Excerpt and Link Only or Deny Posting List due to Copyright Complaints, you will note that govexec.com is not on the excerpt and link list.
If, at some point, it is added to that list, then I'll post excerpts.
(Oh, and as for the wasting bandwidth, I am a dollar-a-day person...are you?)
You can be the smartest person out there or even a college dropout (Steve Jobs,Bill Gates, Zuckerberg,Michael Dell,Marc Rich, Ty Warner,Jack Taylor,etc.) and you will not get promoted without a degree. That is if you get hired in the first place.
The problem with the government is that it equates a degree with actually being smart. Which we we all know is not true. I would venture to say that most government employees could not make it in the private sector. And these same bureaucrats regulate the private sector.
They really have no idea what life is like in the world of cause and effect.
Parasites who are killing their hosts. Trump should promise that he will
cut entire agencies to reduce federal employment by 50%. We can no
deprive our own families so these fat cats can make the seven counties
surrounding Washington D.C. the richest in the nation.
Then you retire and make even more as a Federal contractor pulling a pension or just be a contractor your whole career still making more than Federal workers. Why didn’t the study include that group?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.