Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kevin McCarthy’s truthful gaffe on Benghazi
Washingtonpost. ^ | 09/30/2015 | E.J. Dionne Jr.

Posted on 09/30/2015 6:27:11 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Edited on 09/30/2015 10:48:46 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

So now we know: One of the principal reasons Republicans spent so much public money investigating the tragic Benghazi episode was to bring down Hillary Clinton’s poll numbers.

Rep. Kevin McCarthy, the likely successor to House Speaker John Boehner, told Fox News’ Sean Hannity explicitly on Tuesday night that the Clinton investigation was part of a “strategy to fight and win.”

He explained: “Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened, had we not fought.”

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

The Republican-led House hasn’t been particularly good at governing, but perhaps governing has never been the point. Why govern when there’s a future election to influence?

No doubt Republicans will clean up after McCarthy’s comments by insisting that the politics were a side benefit from a necessary investigation. But it would be nice to know more about the House GOP’s internal deliberations as it launched one inquiry into Clinton after another. Did we need another investigation by the select committee headed by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C.? After all, a two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee cleared the military and the CIA of improper behavior in response to the 2012 attack on the diplomatic compound at Benghazi.

Taxpayers might be interested in learning whether their hard-earned money—sorry, I could not resist invoking that favorite GOP cliche—was going out the door primarily to affect the chances of one particular candidate for president. How much? Rob Garver of the Fiscal Times has estimated that the select committee “will likely spend some $6 million by next year.”

Excerpt, read more at Washington Post


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

Nice try, Kevin.

Judicial Watch did the heavy lifting.

You guys just waited for State to send you emails.

Even Trey Gowdy recognizes now that was a big mistake.

When is your tanning appointment, Kev?


41 posted on 09/30/2015 7:47:03 PM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

With friends like McCarthy, who needs enemies?


42 posted on 09/30/2015 8:13:44 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Four cards short of a complete deck!

Hey Kevin, go home, your mom called and said to send you home for dinner!

43 posted on 09/30/2015 9:02:58 PM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Mcarthy’s appearance on Hannity was the very first time I laid eyes on the man.
I was not -at all - impressed.


44 posted on 09/30/2015 9:07:08 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

What, progressives (in either party) care about 4 people being murdered? In what world?


45 posted on 09/30/2015 9:11:40 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
So now we know: One of the principal reasons Republicans spent so much public money investigating the tragic Benghazi episode was to bring down Hillary Clinton’s poll numbers.

I saw McCarthy on Hannity last night. The above is exactly what I took McCarthy's words to mean.

46 posted on 09/30/2015 9:15:22 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Hey E.J. Dionne Jr.

FOUR Died!

Hillary LIED!

Get over yourself!

47 posted on 09/30/2015 9:21:12 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So the GOPe used the Benghazi hearings for politics, how I detest these people.


48 posted on 09/30/2015 9:34:49 PM PDT by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Pretty much the exact words from the interview:

McCarthy:
What you are going to see is a conservative speaker that takes a conservative congress that puts a strategy to fight and win. And let me give you one example. Everybody thought that Hillary was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi Special Committee, a Select Committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? ‘Cause she is untrustable. But nobody would have known what had happened had we not fought and made that happen.

If you are a left wing delusional useful savant idiot, who is OK with making up a story that a video caused the Benghazi attack (and have that video maker put in jail), and that the attack was an instantaneous riot that had nothing to do with terrorism, and that Hillary did her utmost to protect the Ambassador and staff, and that our Military has no capability to go in and pull out Americans under extreme circumstances; then yes the Hillary Investigation is political.

But if you are a normal person, who thinks it is odd that an Ambassador, a staffer and two former Navy SEALs get killed over an approximate 8 hour gun fight on 9/11 with no attempted rescue than a Select Committee is warranted.

49 posted on 09/30/2015 10:22:06 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kalee
See post 49 for the exact words and my comments.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3343169/posts?page=49#49

50 posted on 09/30/2015 10:26:41 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Thank you very much!



I also didn't take issue with Kevin McCarthy, given that I actually watched his interview with Hannity last night.

EJ Dionne Jr. is the pantywaist trying to create a fuss out of NOTHING.

51 posted on 09/30/2015 10:30:52 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
What a load of crap. No one here has kept up with the Benghazi story is much as I have and it's a red herring to even throw that in there.

I heard McCarthy on Hannity and from his own mouth he said that the Benghazi hearings were to bring Hillary down in the polls. I don't believe that that is true but that is what the asshat said. I didn't need anyone to tell me what I heard.

Your Alinsky ass BS is pathetic.

52 posted on 09/30/2015 10:32:22 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Bull shit buddy. I transcribed the interview. The words start around 4:25 and end around 4:50. Where is the word “polls”?

You hear what you want to hear.

53 posted on 09/30/2015 10:41:34 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
"What are her numbers today?"

Go ahead, tell us that that isn't referring to poll numbers. Show your azz.

54 posted on 09/30/2015 10:45:18 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Your Alinsky ass BS is pathetic.

Fuck you asshole! You are not the only one who knows what the fuck is going on. See my tag line. The Select Committee is warranted.

55 posted on 09/30/2015 10:47:05 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Her numbers are down because of private servers, emails, Benghzie, the Clinton Foundation, etc.

Stick it where the sun don't shine, azzhole.

56 posted on 09/30/2015 10:48:54 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
Sure thing, foulmouth. Who was debunking the Youtube video 14 days after the attack? Not you.
57 posted on 09/30/2015 10:49:10 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
Her numbers are down because of private servers, emails, Benghzie, the Clinton Foundation, etc.

But that's not what McCarthy said is it? lol

And let me give you one example. Everybody thought that Hillary was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi Special Committee, a Select Committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping.

58 posted on 09/30/2015 10:50:29 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Read my tagline you jerk. I was following the lack of a stand down order, etc you condescending POS.


59 posted on 09/30/2015 10:50:53 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
He said her numbers were down because the Select Committee showed she was “untrustable”. Not because it was a political Select Committee. I guess you would have preferred that there is no Benghazi Committee?
60 posted on 09/30/2015 10:54:58 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson