British teen says he’s ‘scarred for life’ after unprotected sex with teaching aide (truncated)

New York Daily News ^ | September 29th, 2015 | BY Meg Wagner

[bert]

-——teenage victim ——

——had sex with him 50 times——

victim? how about perpetrator

better 50 times than an “F”, I mean what kid wouldn’t do any thing to prevent a certain “F”

the now pregnant single teacher has it all and is making a difference

[SaraJohnson]

You, an adult? LOL

[Night Hides Not]

50 times? 50 times? And, he kept going back?

That's the money quote...I call BS.

[nascarnation]

I’d definitely be staying after school for “extra help”

[Mrs. Don-o]

"The Left is the force behind the silliness that suggests that for an adult to initiate a teenaged boy, is morally--and now legally--the same as seducing an underaged girl. "

Only if "the Left" is synonymous with "4,000 years of Judeo-Christian moral law."

[Mrs. Don-o]

Perhaps it would clarify things if we note how quickly this article dropped mention of the two really vulnerable persons in this story: not the hot teacher’s aide and the I-got-lucky boy, but the woman’s two-year-old and her unborn child.

Non-marital sexual relations are morally wrong for a number of reasons, but a biggie is untimely pregnancies and the bringing forth of children into deprivation and disorder.

This article doesn’t tell us if the 15-year-old was indeed the father of the carelessly conceived child, nor even whether the child was born or killed as carelessly as it was conceived.

This woman and her boy-toy were, as far as I can tell, fully and mutually willing to ~screw
~ each other -— meaning to use each other-— each for his or her selfish advantage. I wouldn’t be surprised if their unfortunate offspring ended up dead.