Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Third GOP debate sets off wave of anxiety [no criteria, no undercatd debate]
Politico ^ | 09/27/2015 | Alex Isenstadt and Hadas Gold

Posted on 09/27/2015 1:01:06 PM PDT by GIdget2004

The uncertain terms of the next Republican debate are setting off a wave of anxiety among middle and bottom tier campaigns, with several lashing out at the Republican National Committee for failing to provide clarity on how many candidates will appear on stage..

The campaigns fear the entry criteria for the Oct. 28 debate is being designed to reduce the number of candidates on stage for the third primetime debate -- a life-or-death matter for White House hopefuls on the bubble.  While the RNC doesn’t set the rules, it does have a voice in working with the networks running the debates. The committee has not said how many candidates will be allowed into the primetime debate, which will be held in Boulder, Colorado, and broadcast on CNBC. Nor are there any indications there will be an undercard event, as there have been in the first two debate showdowns of the primary season

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 09/27/2015 1:01:06 PM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Ditch the undercard debate and cut the big show to 8 candidates.


2 posted on 09/27/2015 1:02:37 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Stop billionaires from buying candidates and Republicans wouldn’t have this problem.


3 posted on 09/27/2015 1:05:02 PM PDT by donna (Pray for Revival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Agreed. We all know the only reason Linda Graham decided to run was to try to keep either Cruz or Trump from becoming the nominee.


4 posted on 09/27/2015 1:05:28 PM PDT by EvilCapitalist (1 of 172)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

The cutoff line will include bush


5 posted on 09/27/2015 1:06:26 PM PDT by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Who needs another debate? I can already tell you that Carly Forina and Lindsey Graham will whip Trump’s ass, and the 3rd debate will be the end of Trump’s viability as a candidate.

At least that’s what all the mainstream media will tell us. I’m sure the stories have already been written.


6 posted on 09/27/2015 1:06:27 PM PDT by Junk Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EvilCapitalist

I can’t understand how having the RINO vote split up assists RINOS in winning? Graham certainly isn’t going to siphon off any votes or money from those guys.


7 posted on 09/27/2015 1:07:00 PM PDT by nascarnation (C. Edmund Wright says I'm a moron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Absolutely no reason to be wasting debate time on several of the <1%ers

Miss Lindsey, Pataki, Gilmore and even Ronpauls baby boy have already peaked.


8 posted on 09/27/2015 1:08:54 PM PDT by digger48 (ars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I still maintain that these are setups to knock off Trump, and that he needs to find a way to dodge these and set up his own “mini-debates” with Carson and Cruz and a moderator like Michelle Malkin. He could pay for an hour. They would be hugely watched, more than the “regular” GOP debate.


9 posted on 09/27/2015 1:09:07 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

I’ll bet they find a way to exclude cruz.


10 posted on 09/27/2015 1:10:05 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Imagine the GOPe spending half as much energy attacking liberals as they do conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

11 is too, too many for the main stage. I’m fine with adding more to the undercard debate. It should be an even split between the two.


11 posted on 09/27/2015 1:11:17 PM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Malkin hates Trump and the feeling is mutual.


12 posted on 09/27/2015 1:12:21 PM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

At this point in the debate, the original architects were certain the field would be much smaller.

There are some obvious contenders who should be dropping out - right now. Though they have (or believe they have) valid and important messages, the inclusion of The Donald in the first place knocked that all into a cocked hat, with the great storm against illegal and undocumented squatters now within the territory once known as “the United States of America”, the demonstrated incompetence of those who claim to be in illusionary charge of that territory, the very bad deals negotiated by those claimants, and the overall crash of the economy of the territory.


13 posted on 09/27/2015 1:12:23 PM PDT by alloysteel (If Stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out? - Will Rogers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Yup should be no more than 5 on stage the rest go home.


14 posted on 09/27/2015 1:13:11 PM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Am I the only one who hates these debates and considers them a waste of time? Just let the candidates go out on the campaign trail and address the voters in rallies or town hall meetings. No need for these stupid “moderators” to ask gotcha questions - especially when a couple of the candidates have advance knowledge of the questions. I find it all such a farce. Who wins is a subjective notion - the MSM will always say a RINO won - so, what does this accompish? Nothing except a waste of my time.


15 posted on 09/27/2015 1:13:19 PM PDT by Catsrus ( I callz 'em as I seez 'em.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Trump doesn’t need these debate I would tell them to go pound sand and watch their rating crater.


16 posted on 09/27/2015 1:14:28 PM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

why does Malkin hate Trump? Haven’t heard much from her lately anyway.


17 posted on 09/27/2015 1:14:58 PM PDT by Catsrus ( I callz 'em as I seez 'em.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME
Trump doesn’t need these debates I would tell them to go pound sand and watch their ratings crater.

LOL! Wouldn't that be delicious!

18 posted on 09/27/2015 1:16:14 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (I'll vote for Jeb when Terri Schiavo endorses him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

Yeah. Lincoln and Douglas should never have agreed to them.


19 posted on 09/27/2015 1:16:18 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

That was a one-on-one, which would be okay for the R versus the D candidate. There are way too many of these debates and they become boorish.


20 posted on 09/27/2015 1:18:50 PM PDT by Catsrus ( I callz 'em as I seez 'em.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson