Skip to comments.
Donald Trump on Kim Davis: 'This was not the right job for her'
Washington Times ^
| 9/9/2018
| David Sherfinski
Posted on 09/09/2015 12:19:51 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-208 next last
To: Responsibility2nd
Heard Cavuto echo what Trump said. Just ignorance on display..
And I don’t hate Trump just wish he was more of a Constitutional Conservative.
61
posted on
09/09/2015 12:56:45 PM PDT
by
RginTN
To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
Wrong.
We are all sinners.
*******************
Didn’t say we weren’t sinners. What am I wrong about, pray tell. Are you denying that
she has had all those marriages,
62
posted on
09/09/2015 12:56:50 PM PDT
by
deport
To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
Sorry, I am against gay marriage, but we need to change the laws not break them.
We argue against Obama breaking (not enforcing) laws, and we can’t then turn around and break the law in an official capacity.
We’ll have chaos.
I agree with TRUMP!
To: odawg
Jindal came out the next day after the decision and said the ruling was the law of the land
Oh Really?
64
posted on
09/09/2015 12:59:21 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
To: RginTN
65
posted on
09/09/2015 1:00:14 PM PDT
by
Shelayne
To: LibFreeUSA
We argue against Obama breaking (not enforcing) laws, and we cant then turn around and break the law in an official capacity.
__________________________________________________
What laws are we (Kim Davis) breaking in an official capacity?
66
posted on
09/09/2015 1:00:42 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
To: Arm_Bears
Trump is no the fellow Conservatives are looking for. Maybe a Ted Cruz administration will have a job for him as head of ICE or sumping.
67
posted on
09/09/2015 1:02:36 PM PDT
by
Stepan12
(Our present appeasementof Islam is the Stockholm Syndrome on steroids.)
To: Jagdgewehr
we are a country of lawsNo we're not. We're a country ruled by wicked fools.
Exactly. How can we be a nation of laws when oligarchs change the meaning of words? I looked up the root word for "Matrimony" today. It comes from the Latin word for Mother. (Mater)
The word "Matrimony" literally means the ceremony that creates a "mother."
Faggot marriage has no intention of creating a "mother." It serves no purpose in society. In fact, it serves less than no purpose. It degrades society.
68
posted on
09/09/2015 1:03:15 PM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: deport
Her personal life has been less than perfect. She is not Mother Teresa. She’s not the very Virgin Mary. She became a Christian later in life. I can forgive her. My own personal life has had many instances I would like to forget. The fact that she stood up to the SCOTUS and had the courage to say no, she has risen to a level no one would expect from her. She has become a hero in my eyes. I hope she stays the course she is now on. No. She isn’t holier than Thou. She’s one of us. Warts and all. God bless her!
To: LibFreeUSA
Many laws are unjust.
Do only those folks on the Left have a license to practice civil disobedience?
To: martinidon
If she were a Muslim and refused to issue a liquor license with her name on the license would everyone feel the same way?
___________________________
If the law clearly allowed muslims to opt out and she was given a pass up front, then fine. No problem.
The problem occurs when an illegal order from the SCOTUS comes down requiring her to give up her freedom of religion AND violate state law.
71
posted on
09/09/2015 1:06:06 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
To: odawg
As far as I know, all fifty state governors, who are the elected representative of the state, have not raised their little finger in opposition. They could have banded together and probably stopped it. This is what I think. In a sane nation, 50 governors would have told the Supreme court to "go F**K yourselves." They would have ordered the arrest of any official providing such a document to homosexuals.
Had this happened in the 1980s or earlier, that is very likely what would have happened.
72
posted on
09/09/2015 1:06:15 PM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
I remain confused as to how Trump can be polling high with evangelicals when he makes comments like this and what he said about PP funding.
I thought the goal this time around was to gather up all of those evangelicals that haven’t voted in years?
73
posted on
09/09/2015 1:07:26 PM PDT
by
brothers4thID
(Be professional, be courteous, and have a plan to kill everyone in the room.)
To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
His big trap is what will ultimately sink him.
74
posted on
09/09/2015 1:07:31 PM PDT
by
Coronal
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
She’s on the front page of every paper. Of course it was the right job.
75
posted on
09/09/2015 1:08:15 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
To: flaglady47
It seems to me that no sort of accommodation is going to please her. That makes me suspicious. There should be no accommodation for homosexual marriage. The answer should be "No." Not "maybe". Not "let's split the difference", but "No."
What makes me suspicious is anyone suggesting a compromise with evil.
76
posted on
09/09/2015 1:08:35 PM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: Coronal
Precisely.
He’s gotten away with a lot more than most politicians are normally allowed to get away with.
But that will eventually end.
To: Laissez-faire capitalist; All
Wikipedia:
Kentucky Constitutional Amendment 1 of 2004, is an amendment to the Kentucky Constitution that makes it unconstitutional for the state to recognize or perform same-sex marriages or civil unions. The referendum was approved by 75% of the voters. The text of the amendment states:
Only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Kentucky. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized.
To: LibFreeUSA
79
posted on
09/09/2015 1:12:22 PM PDT
by
brothers4thID
(Be professional, be courteous, and have a plan to kill everyone in the room.)
To: Responsibility2nd
Yes, Really.
He’s campaigning now. Politicians take both sides of an issue, like Jindal has done with Common Core. When people in Louisiana raised up against it, he kind of changed side, albeit half-heartedly. He really doesn’t give a damn.
80
posted on
09/09/2015 1:14:40 PM PDT
by
odawg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-208 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson