Skip to comments.
Donald Trump: Nuclear deal calls for US to defend Iran against Israeli attack
The Jerusalem Post ^
| 9/3/2015
Posted on 09/03/2015 3:01:29 PM PDT by detective
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: detective
There should immediately be a resolution entered in the US Senate and House to prohibit the use of any US military and/or intelligence assets either to aid Iran or that through their use might endanger Israel.
21
posted on
09/03/2015 4:14:17 PM PDT
by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
To: detective
But what would Trump do about radical Islamists?
22
posted on
09/03/2015 5:32:44 PM PDT
by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
To: detective
I hope that our uniformed personnel and especially their O-1 to O-6 leaders would think about whether an order to protect terrorists developing nukes against their intended victims is a lawful order. I am not advocating illegal conduct, or course, just thoughtful leadership at all times in these terrible days for our country.
23
posted on
09/03/2015 6:23:54 PM PDT
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: BigEdLB
Thanks. I hope they have spoke about it.
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Known for six or eight weeks. But like so many issues, Trump appears to be the only candidate speaking out loudly. Or getting media coverage.
25
posted on
09/04/2015 6:56:07 AM PDT
by
SJackson
("Everybody has a plan until they get hit. Mike Tyson)
To: Nep Nep
But by then Iran will have already received the $150 billion in frozen assets and may very well have nuclear weapons.
26
posted on
09/04/2015 10:08:13 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(There's a right to gay marriage in the Constitution but there is no right of an unborn baby to life.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson