Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How did our cool weather get logged by NOAA as hot?
news.com.au ^ | 2nd September 2015 | Andrew Bolt

Posted on 09/02/2015 2:01:29 PM PDT by naturalman1975

There is something very odd about the NOAA claim of a very hot July, thanks to global warming:

July was the hottest month on Earth since records began...

Take the NOAA map above. Check Australia, said to have had average or above-average temperatures over much of the continent, apart from the much-warmer-than-average bits around Sydney and parts of Western Australia.

Liberal MP Craig Kelly is curious:

HOW DOES THE COLDEST MONTH IN 20 YEARS BECOME THE HOTTEST MONTH “EVER’’ ?

July in Melbourne was widely reported as the ”Coldest July in 20 years”

It also was reported at the start of August that Sydney had just “notched its longest cold spell in 26 years” and it was also “the coolest July for the city since 2002”

Even our Bureau of Meteorology reported; ”Temperatures were below average across Sydney during July”

However, have close look at the below map produced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) an Obama Government agency (the same people that assert that July 2015 was the hottest month ever).

NOAA assert that temperatures in Melbourne for July 2015 were “Warmer than Average” and for Sydney they were “Much warmer than average”.

Can anyone explain this ?

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; nasa; noaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
We often see attempts by 'climate change' advocates to say that unusually cold weather is also somehow just as much proof of their ideas, as hot weather is. But this goes beyond that. It's really hard to see how anybody could argue that the NOAA data is accurate and honest. They are claiming that July was warmer than average in parts of Australia, as part of their general statement that this was the hottest month ever. But Australia's own Bureau of Meteorology - which is an agency that pushes the climate change agenda as hard as any, and certainly wants people to believe in it - says the exact opposite about local conditions. It has no agenda to oppose the NOAA - it is in accord with it politically.
1 posted on 09/02/2015 2:01:29 PM PDT by naturalman1975
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

The temperature has been increased in lockstep with the chocolate ration.


2 posted on 09/02/2015 2:04:26 PM PDT by henkster (Ms. Clinton, are you a criminal or just really stupid?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
How did our cool weather get logged by NOAA as hot?

Because they're lying.

Let's not overthink this.

3 posted on 09/02/2015 2:05:32 PM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

for our brothers and sisters down under that may be unfamilar with American democrats... let me provide some insight.

whenever a democrat communicates, what will be produced will be lies. they are the party of no ethics or morals. they commit fraud like you prepare breakfast, and just as regularly.


4 posted on 09/02/2015 2:08:17 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
NOAA has been fudging statistics and cooking the book for years. It's gotten to be laughable - its claims often conflict with its own public data. If you can place a Las Vegas bet that 2015 will be NOAA's hottest year ever, do it because no matter how cold the last four months of the year are, the claim will be made.

Here, we had a cool and wet Spring and seasonal Summer weather. Much cooler and more pleasant than we were in drought a few years ago.

5 posted on 09/02/2015 2:08:54 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Bookmark.


6 posted on 09/02/2015 2:09:08 PM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Actually, there isn’t as much difference in the two maps as the author suggests. The NASA map suggests a slightly warmer average temperature, but not dramatically so.


7 posted on 09/02/2015 2:13:12 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

I think I heard our August average this year was 84. 84! One of the cooler ones I remember.


8 posted on 09/02/2015 2:14:11 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

It would be interesting to see if the problem is with NOAA’s current data or with the historical data. I bet the second because it is far easier to lie about old data and refuse to publish the raw data.


9 posted on 09/02/2015 2:16:19 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (The 1st amendment is the voice and the 2nd is the teeth of freedom. Obama wants to knock out both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbill
Because they're lying.

Let's not overthink this.


Occam's razor
10 posted on 09/02/2015 2:16:24 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

To the Left, lies and ‘truth’ are of equal importance, and equal validity. Does a ‘lie’ advance the Ultimate Victory of Socialism? Then, it is justified. It’s for the People’s welfare, so Ends justify Means.


11 posted on 09/02/2015 2:18:02 PM PDT by jonascord (It's sarcasm unless otherwise noted... This time, it's not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

I remember when that put up that satellite to measure global warming (about 10 year ago or so). I thought at the time it was a big waste of money. Now, I now it was, because it shows - from space - that there is no global warming. But the left ignores it.

Scientific data only works when it works for them.

Oh, well . . .


12 posted on 09/02/2015 2:24:48 PM PDT by impactplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Yes, I can explain it - they LIE!


13 posted on 09/02/2015 2:26:23 PM PDT by beethovenfan (Islam is a cancer on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Because global warming causes global cooling - get it?


14 posted on 09/02/2015 2:43:49 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Starting to catch on to what is going on?


15 posted on 09/02/2015 3:03:25 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

they take actual temperatures and then add a couple of degrees to match their computer models and WaLaa: cold is now HOT.


16 posted on 09/02/2015 3:04:03 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

17 posted on 09/02/2015 3:20:12 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

With over 2000 record cold temps set here in the USA earlier this year, we still managed the HOTTEST YEAR EVER ON RECORD!!! EVER!!!

Any my AGW Hysterion associates still can’t understand why I am a “denier.”


18 posted on 09/02/2015 3:40:51 PM PDT by West Texas Chuck ( NOTE TO RNC: I will not be voting for another Bush. Ever. I don't care what his last name is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

http://www.science20.com/news_articles/new_ice_age_is_coming_by_2030_says_analysis-156558


19 posted on 09/02/2015 3:46:54 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Problem with NOAA data is it does not show SE Australia as being significantly cooler than normal. It was. If you notice over half of the record global warm record readings were in the ocean. So yes if you were a fish it was hot. The error, besides the obvious biases, is taking only surface temps of the Ocean. The Oceans are three dimensional heat sinks. If Ocean current slows, the heat sink is less efficient.


20 posted on 09/02/2015 4:06:55 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The use of the name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson