Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Denver Corruptocrats' Chick-fil-A Smokescreen
Townhall.com ^ | August 28, 2015 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 08/28/2015 5:23:16 AM PDT by Kaslin

Holier-than-thou liberals on the Denver city council are waging war on Chick-fil-A in the name of tolerance and diversity. Now, let me tell you what the squawking is really all about: It's a distraction, a feint, a mile-high smokescreen.

Spiteful Democrats claim they are upholding progressive "Denver values" by delaying approval of an airport concession contract with the Christian-owned restaurant chain. But the politically correct storm over same-sex marriage (which Chick-fil-A CEO Dan Cathy personally opposes) is convenient cover for the local government's serial mismanagement, bloated spending and shady contracting practices.

Denver International Airport concessionaires raked in more than $322 million in gross revenue last year amid longstanding complaints of political favoritism and dirty dealing that date back to the facility's construction in the mid-1990s.

You should know that while Denver's city council leftists falsely accuse Chick-fil-A of discriminatory practices, they've been embroiled in litigation over bid-rigging allegations involving a separate $53 million airport concessions contract. Last fall, a retail group filed suit against the city council rubber-stampers and Denver International Airport officials for allegedly conspiring to help the winning bidder snag a seven-year deal to run the airport's duty-free shops.

The plaintiffs in the case, DIA Retail, uncovered what they call "systemic" misconduct and manipulation of the award process, including multiple violations of rules prohibiting contact between the winning bidder, Hudson Group, and government officials after submitting their request for proposal.

Then there's the city's own audit of the airport's "disadvantaged concessionaire program" released in May, which showed that Denver officials are much better at preaching to others about "diversity" than practicing it themselves. After finding that half of DIA's food and beverage revenue was concentrated in the hands of three operators, the auditor exposed "questionable" financial wealth claims by some concession owners certified by the city as "economically disadvantaged."

Gaming the airport contract system is as popular a Colorado pastime as skiing and rock-climbing.

In April, a jury indicted city employee Larry Lee Stevenson, a supervisor in Denver's Excise and Licensing Department, for allegedly accepting a cash bribe to help a local business get a deal to run parking operations at the airport. DIA's nearly $40 million "minority-owned" mechanical construction contract, which the city awarded to black female businesswoman Denise Burgess, is a massive front for non-minority subcontractors, according to a Denver Post investigation last year.

"Burgess Services is not equipped to carry out a mechanical project. It subcontracts the construction work to other companies," the paper found. "Yet the entire contract value counts toward the airport project's overall minority- and women-owned business-enterprise participation goal of 30 percent. In reality, minority- and women-owned businesses are doing only a fraction of the work on Burgess' contract."

And the cost of that work keeps soaring.

DIA overspending is epidemic. Another scathing audit identified skyrocketing cost overruns in the airport's hotel and transit construction project -- scheduled to soar from an initial estimate of $500 million to at least $730 million -- thanks to shoddy recordkeeping and nonexistent oversight.

What kind of financial controllers are at the wheel? Fraudulent accountants like Laura Trujillo, who was fired earlier this summer after the Mountain States Employers Council concluded that "there was no record of Trujillo ever having a CPA license, no record of her ever having applied for such a license, and no record of her ever having applied to take the CPA exam in Colorado."

Perhaps the sanctimonious Denver city council should spend less time finger-wagging at other businesses and more time minding its own sordid henhouse.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: chickfila; denver

1 posted on 08/28/2015 5:23:16 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Nothing new here. Corruption has been a way of life in Colorado and especially Denver for a long long time. The next time any of you happen to fly in to DIA (Democrats In Action) and drive/ride into the city via Pena Blvd., ask your self, “Why does Pena Blvd take a 90 degree turn out here on the prairie? It sure as hell wasn’t to save the trailer park that was there 20+ years ago. Ya think maybe the wrong folks did not own the Trailer park, but did own the land next to it?


2 posted on 08/28/2015 5:37:59 AM PDT by Tupelo (Trump is no Reagan, but he is a fighter.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I think there may be another reason why Denver International Airport doesn't want Chick-Fil-A: the very fact Chick-Fil-A restaurants are closed on Sundays. And that means potentially 16% less revenue than other restaurant concessions at airport restaurants.
3 posted on 08/28/2015 6:37:41 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

That is possible, but there are other chicken restaurants that are open on Sundays. So I am not buying that excuse


4 posted on 08/28/2015 7:29:25 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Burgess Services is not equipped to carry out a mechanical project. It subcontracts the construction work to other companies,”

This is called brokering. Happens all the time in these “disadvantaged business” programs. To bypasses the rules on subcontracting the disadvantages businesses will sometimes “rent” equipment, sometimes with the “operators”, to conduct the work.

What’s worse, many state contracts require that the prime contractor subcontract a percentage of the work to “disadvantaged businesses”. Basically, the prime contractor is strong armed into hire subcontractors from a list, even if they are fully capable of doing the work. Bare in mind, “disadvantaged businesses” are certificated as such by the State or contracting agency. So then the shady “disadvantage business” shows up to do the work and starts brokering. The State/agency wi then brow beat the prime contractor for not policing the partices of the “disadvantaged business”. I’ve been in those meetings. Wtf...you (State/agency) certified the “disadvantaged business”, why is it the prime contractors responsibility to police the practices of someone they were, in essence, forced to hire...??? It’s all BS!


5 posted on 08/28/2015 7:35:03 AM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson